![]() |
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 2793142)
It's pretty remarkable that they just built that new area and it's so crowded from the start. There definitely seems to be a latrinal asymmetry that should have been covered in the Transition Process Agreement. Looks like LCAL had a "whale" after all, a whale-of-a-bathroom.
|
Originally Posted by HercAC
(Post 2793191)
Don’t forget EVERYONE in the SFO CPO has a private office each the size of the back bag room:confused:
|
Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer
(Post 2793158)
Supposedly (before I was based in IAH) the entire CPO and “urinals on parade” are because that entire area was the gate-waiting-area for RJs, similar to the B-concourse. That’s why they still have 30 different national flags at the top of the escalators.
It was a huge restroom because lots of pax were using it. Anyway, that’s what I was told in 2014. |
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 2793234)
Ouch. Nothing like leaders taking care of their people.
|
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 2792999)
And the back left stall always has a chair in it for some reason. Curious place.
|
Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer
(Post 2793158)
Supposedly (before I was based in IAH) the entire CPO and “urinals on parade” are because that entire area was the gate-waiting-area for RJs, similar to the B-concourse. That’s why they still have 30 different national flags at the top of the escalators.
It was a huge restroom because lots of pax were using it. Anyway, that’s what I was told in 2014. |
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 2793142)
It's pretty remarkable that they just built that new area and it's so crowded from the start. There definitely seems to be a latrinal asymmetry that should have been covered in the Transition Process Agreement. Looks like LCAL had a "whale" after all, a whale-of-a-bathroom.
There just wasn’t money in the building budget for more. So..... Just use the sidewalks outside. It’s good enough for the tenderloin area. |
Originally Posted by BMEP100
(Post 2793454)
As part of the city’s new eco-friendly commitment , all water dispensing fixtures require a permit which for businesses costs $279,000 dollars/ per fixture, plus a carbon offset to cover the ozone damage done by construction equipment.
|
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 2793408)
It's for the fed.
|
Originally Posted by BMEP100
(Post 2793454)
As part of the city’s new eco-friendly commitment , all water dispensing fixtures require a permit which for businesses costs $279,000 dollars/ per fixture, plus a carbon offset to cover the ozone damage done by construction equipment.
There just wasn’t money in the building budget for more. So..... Just use the sidewalks outside. It’s good enough for the tenderloin area. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:17 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands