Vacancy 19-07V
02-14-2019, 07:32 AM
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 280
Vacancy 19-07V
Small vacancy, but a vacancy is better than no vacancy.
No movement at ORD...standard
- 737 CA - 1 (DEN)
- A-320 CA - 25 (EWR, SFO)
- 777 FO - 10 (EWR)
- 787 FO - 13 (EWR, DEN)
- 756 FO - 10 (DEN)
- 737 FO - 90 (CLE, EWR, SFO, DCA, DEN, IAH, ORD)
- A-320 FO - 65 (EWR, DCA, SFO, DEN)
No movement at ORD...standard
02-14-2019, 10:56 AM
#4
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: B737 CA
Posts: 226
Why are there more CAs in any given narrow body category than the respective FO category? I understand the the more FOs on wide body than CAs due to augmentation.
A current example of this is SFO756CA/FO. 86 SFO756CAs and 68 SFO756FOs. Does that mean super chill schedules than for that fat category of SFO756CA?
A current example of this is SFO756CA/FO. 86 SFO756CAs and 68 SFO756FOs. Does that mean super chill schedules than for that fat category of SFO756CA?
02-14-2019, 11:13 AM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,029
Originally Posted by Macdacpilot
Why are there more CAs in any given narrow body category than the respective FO category? I understand the the more FOs on wide body than CAs due to augmentation.
A current example of this is SFO756CA/FO. 86 SFO756CAs and 68 SFO756FOs. Does that mean super chill schedules than for that fat category of SFO756CA?
A current example of this is SFO756CA/FO. 86 SFO756CAs and 68 SFO756FOs. Does that mean super chill schedules than for that fat category of SFO756CA?
One reasons is LOAs and vacation. Almost half the NB CA get 42 days/yr vacation. As we age we are more likely to have issues requiring time off. Getting old sucks in that regard lol.
02-14-2019, 06:45 PM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2012
Posts: 203
Originally Posted by HercAC
5 737 FO vacancies in “Lil ORD” aka CLE is pretty significant
Take that however you choose to.
Not good, not bad. Just not “Lil” ORD.
02-14-2019, 07:22 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 916
Originally Posted by Winston
Did we skip over “Vacancy 19-06” for some reason like the 13th floor of building?
The last bid was effective in May, so it was an -05 bid.
Since there was so much time between this bid and the last one, we skipped right over any option to have a bid effective in June
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
