Search
Notices

737 MAX grounded

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-2019, 10:35 AM
  #471  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by Larry in TN View Post
I haven't changed a thing. I just keep trying to explain it differently so that people who like make discussions personal might finally understand.



The bottom line is the same. Three crews had nearly identical failures. One crew followed the procedure and landed safely. Two crews did not follow the procedure and didn't. We need to find out why.

The one crew that recovered from the design flaw had the advantage of a third pilot in the smart seat. We need to find out why on that as well.
FXLAX is offline  
Old 08-14-2019, 07:56 PM
  #472  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,158
Default

Originally Posted by FXLAX View Post
The one crew that recovered from the design flaw had the advantage of a third pilot in the smart seat. We need to find out why on that as well.
Time to bring back the guppy FE seat.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 08-15-2019, 07:41 AM
  #473  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 854
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald View Post
So, with that in mind, neither system performed to the intended standards of certification.
I'm good with that.

My problem is that the only thing being addressed is the engineering. The engineering problem is straightforward and is being fixed.

The crew performance issue is being ignored. People are minimizing it because 'Boeing's screw up was so bad'. Both of those airplanes were flyable. We have to find out why two crews were unable to fly them and figure out how to fix that because it applies not only to unintended MCAS activations but to any complex failure that will happen again with any system on any airplane.

We have to be prepared to handle them.

The AF447 crew had a similar problem. Multiple warnings and inaccurate readings confused the crew and distracted them from the information they needed, and was available, which would have allowed them to understand their situation and recover the airplane.

Originally Posted by symbian simian View Post
Single source used for a flight control input in combination with some seriously atrocious "piloting".
Yes. Good example. We have to be prepared to handle these failures even as the manufacturers continue to make them less likely.

Originally Posted by FXLAX View Post
The one crew that recovered from the design flaw had the advantage of a third pilot in the smart seat. We need to find out why on that as well.
I agree.
Larry in TN is offline  
Old 08-15-2019, 07:44 AM
  #474  
Squawking 2000
 
Winston's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: Skeptical
Posts: 737
Default

FWIW: A newhire buddy of mine in BI said the bigwigs making their way through TK have been saying the MAX situation should be resolved by October.

No comments please regarding which year.
Winston is offline  
Old 08-15-2019, 07:47 AM
  #475  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,709
Default

Originally Posted by Winston View Post
FWIW: A newhire buddy of mine in BI said the bigwigs making their way through TK have been saying the MAX situation should be resolved by October.

No comments please regarding which year.
Same time frame that we are supposed to have 17,000 pilots on property.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 08-15-2019, 07:49 AM
  #476  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,158
Default

Originally Posted by Larry in TN View Post
I'm good with that.

My problem is that the only thing being addressed is the engineering. The engineering problem is straightforward and is being fixed.

The crew performance issue is being ignored. We have to be prepared to handle them.
I wouldn't say that the crew performance is being ignored. Since the official accident reports are not out, I'd say people are waiting for the official results before jumping to conclusions. They will have to break out differences between the lack of information/training on Boeing's part, the crappy crew experience, and the poor stick and rudder skills. That's going to be the difficult part. And then, of course, the lawyers will have a field day with the results.

So, Until the official reports are out, it's really too soon to speculate on the part of the crew. I don't think anyone is arguing it wasn't a causal factor, just too soon grasshopper.
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 08-15-2019, 11:18 AM
  #477  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Captain
Posts: 1,561
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss View Post
Same time frame that we are supposed to have 17,000 pilots on property.


How many you have on the seniority list anyway as of today
Just wondering
Sniper66 is offline  
Old 08-15-2019, 01:59 PM
  #478  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,709
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper66 View Post
How many you have on the seniority list anyway as of today
Just wondering
As of July 15th, it was just shy of 13,000 including LTDs etc.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 08-15-2019, 07:21 PM
  #479  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss View Post
Same time frame that we are supposed to have 17,000 pilots on property.
Sure wish we had all of those bodies when the A-350 shows up any day now........ oh wait, that was BS too.
Itsajob is offline  
Old 10-14-2019, 11:57 AM
  #480  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

CEO out. Remarkably similar to HBO “Succession”. A sacrifice had to be made. Big enough to say, that’s big enough.
APC225 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CLazarus
United
810
04-04-2020 06:58 PM
n606tw
JetBlue
47
10-20-2019 09:29 AM
Sunvox
United
45
03-17-2017 05:56 AM
Raptor
FedEx
132
07-20-2016 05:08 PM
Kapitanleutnant
Foreign
0
04-11-2015 07:32 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices