Vacancy 20-03V
10-11-2019, 10:04 AM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 634
Originally Posted by frascaflyer
FRA, MUC, and BRU, and less credit since it flies faster than the 767 and the 777.
If I were ORD 777 I'd wait for the bump, and the more junior it goes, the more people can bump in.
If I were ORD 777 I'd wait for the bump, and the more junior it goes, the more people can bump in.
10-11-2019, 10:22 AM
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 662
The company has already said why they prefer to break up the bids, so when you look at this one combined with last months in that context, pretty damn nice movement. Now that we have 2 month widebody FOs, guess all that’s left is 2 yr NB Capts. Probably won’t go that junior right now, but if not for the max debacle and all the capt seats those jets would generate, we’d be there imo.
10-11-2019, 11:08 AM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 262
Originally Posted by webecheck
The company has already said why they prefer to break up the bids, so when you look at this one combined with last months in that context, pretty damn nice movement. Now that we have 2 month widebody FOs, guess all that’s left is 2 yr NB Capts. Probably won’t go that junior right now, but if not for the max debacle and all the capt seats those jets would generate, we’d be there imo.
10-11-2019, 08:15 PM
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: EWR 777 Captain
Posts: 1,715
Originally Posted by Aviatorr
Agree all the more reason we should sue Boeing for lost wages and opportunities related to the Max
Totally agree
Really though, how stupid can a Union be.? I'll go on record here to say that SWAPA will not prevail in their lawsuit against Boeing. Sheeesh, what maroooooons.
10-12-2019, 07:47 AM
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,882
Originally Posted by Sunvox
LOL.
Totally agree
Really though, how stupid can a Union be.? I'll go on record here to say that SWAPA will not prevail in their lawsuit against Boeing. Sheeesh, what maroooooons.
Totally agree
Really though, how stupid can a Union be.? I'll go on record here to say that SWAPA will not prevail in their lawsuit against Boeing. Sheeesh, what maroooooons.
10-12-2019, 08:09 AM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: 777FO
Posts: 703
Originally Posted by EWRflyr
Glad I'm not the only one who finds that lawsuit stupid. Why doesn't SWAPA just sue DALALPA instead? After all, it's the DAL pilots who made all the extra money and over time this summer off the woes of the other US airlines that had grounded MAX fleets.
10-12-2019, 08:57 AM
#17
New Hire
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 6
I was wondering how many vacancies are going to be in CLE.
10-12-2019, 09:09 AM
#18
You look like a nail
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 451
Originally Posted by Sunvox
LOL.
Totally agree
Really though, how stupid can a Union be.? I'll go on record here to say that SWAPA will not prevail in their lawsuit against Boeing. Sheeesh, what maroooooons.
Totally agree
Really though, how stupid can a Union be.? I'll go on record here to say that SWAPA will not prevail in their lawsuit against Boeing. Sheeesh, what maroooooons.
FACTS: All pilots at SWA fly the B737 aircraft. Boeing delivered a product with undisclosed defects. SWA pilots suffered financial damage due to Boeing’s negligence. SWAPA is seeking $10K per pilot in restitution.
Weather or not they prevail is less important than recognizing a union that’s looking to make its members financially whole.
Nice unity Joe.
10-12-2019, 09:33 AM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: 777FO
Posts: 703
Originally Posted by Thor
FACTS: All pilots at SWA fly the B737 aircraft. Boeing delivered a product with undisclosed defects. SWA pilots suffered financial damage due to Boeing’s negligence. SWAPA is seeking $10K per pilot in restitution.
. The only real winners on these things are the law firms 
Note: Since SW flies 737s exclusively their pilot group has a stronger case for damages than we do. But I'm not holding my breath in any case... Hopefully I can make any money back when 30+ Maxes come back on the line in very short order.
10-12-2019, 10:28 AM
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 373
Thor
What company made it a requirement for no additional training to be required with the MaX order? Your lawsuit is a product of your own companies stupidity. Btw ual is just as just as guilty. Every US airline was giddy (Except DAL but I’m sure they were all too happy use the max for a better 320 price) at lower cost on a current type. Boeing caved.
Fun little side not SWA had an employees with in ranks that fully understood the short comings of the max.
What company made it a requirement for no additional training to be required with the MaX order? Your lawsuit is a product of your own companies stupidity. Btw ual is just as just as guilty. Every US airline was giddy (Except DAL but I’m sure they were all too happy use the max for a better 320 price) at lower cost on a current type. Boeing caved.
Fun little side not SWA had an employees with in ranks that fully understood the short comings of the max.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
