![]() |
Unencumbered refers to an asset or property that is free and clear of any encumbrances, such as creditor claims or liens. An unencumbered asset is much easier to sell or transfer than one with an encumbrance. Examples of common unencumbered assets are houses free from mortgages and other liens, cars with paid off loans/notes, or stocks purchased in a cash account.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/u/unencumbered.asp |
Originally Posted by TFAYD
(Post 2995896)
companies go bankrupt because they cannot pay their bills or make payroll. It’s about cash flow and liquidity.
debt doesn’t matter unless it is due. SOMEONE is going to take a huge haircut with this, debt holders, employees, someone. Let’s all pray this thing blows off in the shortest amount of time to at least hit bottom, not there yet. |
Originally Posted by Bat Guano
(Post 2995915)
Unencumbered refers to an asset or property that is free and clear of any encumbrances, such as creditor claims or liens. An unencumbered asset is much easier to sell or transfer than one with an encumbrance. Examples of common unencumbered assets are houses free from mortgages and other liens, cars with paid off loans/notes, or stocks purchased in a cash account.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/u/unencumbered.asp Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by detpilot
(Post 2995954)
Thanks. So for us, that'd likely be airplanes we own, tools, parts, etc? Would any of those things actually sell for close to the value they're expecting? In other words, is that $20 billion likely to only actually fetch $10 billion, while crippling the operation?
Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by C2078
(Post 2995931)
That does not paint the entire picture. Liquidity gets you through the short term, but if you have to encumber a large amount of your assets to do it, then that becomes a MAJOR long term problem because the cash required to pay down those loans simply will not be there. Of course any company will do what it takes to get through the short term, but if they rack up too much debt to do it, it will become a long term issue. This is the fundamental problem that AA has, while it’s short term liquidity might be adequate, if this goes on for an extended period of time, they have over $30B in debt vs $42B (annually) or so in revenue, and this revenue number will come down big time. When you have more debt than revenue, situation gets serious.
SOMEONE is going to take a huge haircut with this, debt holders, employees, someone. Let’s all pray this thing blows off in the shortest amount of time to at least hit bottom, not there yet. every leveraged business will run into issues if the revenue stream goes a way - it is just a matter of time. |
Originally Posted by detpilot
(Post 2995954)
Thanks. So for us, that'd likely be airplanes we own, tools, parts, etc? Would any of those things actually sell for close to the value they're expecting? In other words, is that $20 billion likely to only actually fetch $10 billion, while crippling the operation?
Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk And, FWIW, an airline can be fully leveraged with no unencumbered assets without crippling the operation. Debt can be a useful survival tool as long as one can make the payments. One recent example is CAL prior to the merger. |
Originally Posted by Happyflyer
(Post 2995955)
Its collateral to borrow against, like a giant pawn shop.
|
Originally Posted by Bluewaffle
(Post 2995552)
profit sharing checks have nothing to do with liquidity. UAL has about 8 Billion on tap, the most of the Big three. DAL about 5 Billion albeit less debt
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:28 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands