![]() |
Originally Posted by SeeYa
(Post 3021151)
Scott Kirby said it today at United’s town hall
If history is any indication, Kirby is trustworthy. |
I wouldn’t read into this off the cuff comment by Kirby as a definite end of the line for ExpressJet. Heck, UAL owns a portion of ExpressJet. I hope they get to keep (and expand) their ERJ 175 opportunities vice transferring them to SkyWest. Heck, maybe take airframes from some of our non owned contractors like SkyWest or Republic and fly them pseudo “in-house” with enhanced flow-through/seniority opportunity at Mainline UAL while also providing furlough protection for our most susceptible first officers whom might need a place to call home for a year or so beginning this Fall.
|
Originally Posted by Vernon Demerest
(Post 3021671)
I wouldn’t read into this off the cuff comment by Kirby as a definite end of the line for ExpressJet. Heck, UAL owns a portion of ExpressJet. I hope they get to keep (and expand) their ERJ 175 opportunities vice transferring them to SkyWest. Heck, maybe take airframes from some of our non owned contractors like SkyWest or Republic and fly them pseudo “in-house” with enhanced flow-through/seniority opportunity at Mainline UAL while also providing furlough protection for our most susceptible first officers whom might need a place to call home for a year or so beginning this Fall.
|
Originally Posted by Itsajob
(Post 3021465)
People in Hays can drive 2.5 hours to ICT. People in CLL drive to IAH........ Hays is so small that it could potentially be dropped. My relatives live in a small town about twice the size of Hays and they drive 2 hours to a bigger city if they need to fly.
|
Originally Posted by Vernon Demerest
(Post 3021671)
Heck, maybe take airframes from some of our non owned contractors like SkyWest or Republic and fly them pseudo “in-house”...
|
"Flexibility" is the word he said a lot. Gonna be interesting to see how this turns out in many aspects.
|
Originally Posted by BRJPilot
(Post 3021715)
The transfers of 175s from XJT have already started and are in fact, speeding up. Oh, and most of the 175s at SkyWest and Republic are owned by those companies if I’m not mistaken.
united owns 105 of the 175s flying as express and another 25 on the tarmac in Brazil Mesa Republic SKW alll need to come in house period |
Originally Posted by Sniper66
(Post 3021735)
united owns 105 of the 175s flying as express and another 25 on the tarmac in Brazil
Mesa Republic SKW alll need to come in house period they have been killing it in times like these providing direct liquidity (loans) to UA and financing aircraft so that UA doesn’t have to and conserve cash. |
Originally Posted by TFAYD
(Post 3021754)
for yes - just watch SKYW though. They are really an aircraft leasing company with an associated airline operation.
they have been killing it in times like these providing direct liquidity (loans) to UA and financing aircraft so that UA doesn’t have to and conserve cash. |
Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
(Post 3022080)
SkyWest might very well turn into the next major airline to compete against United.
|
Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
(Post 3022080)
SkyWest might very well turn into the next major airline to compete against United.
Personally, I'd love to see Skywest withdraw from United Express to pursue this. |
Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
(Post 3022080)
SkyWest might very well turn into the next major airline to compete against United.
they consider themselves major anyway. flew with ex Skywest FOs that told me so Not koolaid works for some |
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
(Post 3022119)
You should probably apply. Sounds like a great opportunity.
Personally, I'd love to see Skywest withdraw from United Express to pursue this. |
Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
(Post 3022177)
As much as I dislike Skywest, anything is possible in this industry. Now is a great time to take advantage of the opportunities that present themselves. I'm willing to wager Skywest pilots would be jumping up and down for the opportunity to fly larger mainline aircraft for much less pay.
“Expressjet is still hiring and will be for the foreseeable future. 50 seat flying is stronger than ever.” |
There is alway a place for a small 50 seat presence. I am presuming the lost 50 seaters would be Air Wis and Skywest. That is 170 frames. ExpressJet LR could go and keep the XR. That’s another 68. That would leave about 140 out of the current ~380. Presuming the 550 isn’t the first to be chopped.
|
Originally Posted by Happyflyer
(Post 3021246)
The consensus is American domestic will return much faster than high density long haul. I hoping Christmas/Thanksgiving travel will spark it.
United will have to get with the times and rely less on their PamAm routes. If they bring on a SNB the 550 can become a 700 again. They may realize they're over exposed in one segment of demand. After this mess H1N1, or SARS or any other further Chinese sanitary virus pops off they're gonna be quick to shut it down. There Asian reliance will forever have to proceed with caution for steady revenue. |
Originally Posted by Itsajob
(Post 3022216)
This is coming from someone who less than a week ago said that 50 seat flying was stronger than ever on a Republic thread.
“Expressjet is still hiring and will be for the foreseeable future. 50 seat flying is stronger than ever.” |
Originally Posted by blockplus
(Post 3022290)
There is alway a place for a small 50 seat presence. I am presuming the lost 50 seaters would be Air Wis and Skywest. That is 170 frames. ExpressJet LR could go and keep the XR. That’s another 68. That would leave about 140 out of the current ~380. Presuming the 550 isn’t the first to be chopped.
|
Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
(Post 3022323)
50 seat jets do pretty darn well in a crushing economy like this. At some point soon, the CRJ550 will be converted to 76 seats and the CRJ 200 will be parked. Many opportunities will arise from the majors leaving markets and significantly reducing their capacity.
|
Originally Posted by JoePatroni
(Post 3022332)
United is not going to subsidize a fee for departure arrangement with no passengers.
If they accept the bailout loan terms, they have to provide service to all the cities according to the govt rules. It's much cheaper running RJs than SNB or WBs. |
Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
(Post 3022492)
If they accept the bailout loan terms, they have to provide service to all the cities according to the govt rules. It's much cheaper running RJs than SNB or WBs.
wrong read it again |
Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
(Post 3022492)
If they accept the bailout loan terms, they have to provide service to all the cities according to the govt rules. It's much cheaper running RJs than SNB or WBs.
|
Originally Posted by GA2Jets
(Post 3021417)
Why the 50 seats though? I get they're not that great but they make a lot of money for the company by going into tiny markets. Short term I guess I understand but long term...are you telling me that 737s will be going into Hays, KS? Or that they're just going to give up towns like that? I don't buy it...
If SK says they're gone, he knows that they're not moneymakers because if there's one thing he does extremely well is crunch numbers.
Originally Posted by JayD
(Post 3021713)
What you’re not factoring in is that HYS serves the whole northwestern part of KS so many on the flight already drove 1.5-2 hrs from an even smaller town to get to HYS to fly. Their only other UA option is to drive 3-4 hours to DEN, or they can drive the 1-2 hours to GCK and fly on AA. Before HYS they would go to GCK and the business went to AA.
|
Originally Posted by Sniper66
(Post 3022124)
they consider themselves major anyway.
flew with ex Skywest FOs that told me so Not koolaid works for some |
Originally Posted by TFAYD
(Post 3022597)
pilots don’t think in these terms but SkyWest is a major according to official DOT definition (more than 1B in revenue).
so was ASA ACA AW MAG etc their attitude is not acceptable ( whatever percentage of them) all regionals suck and that’s why they apply here sorry for the venting |
Originally Posted by Sniper66
(Post 3022687)
so was ASA ACA AW MAG etc
their attitude is not acceptable ( whatever percentage of them) all regionals suck and that’s why they apply here sorry for the venting |
Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
(Post 3022706)
Regional a/c are 25% of United’s total fleet. The best solution to the current crisis is to merge all ALPA original date of hire seniority numbers across the regionals and mainline.
Personally, I would have loved DOH integration during the UAL/CAL merger but, alas, that's not part of ALPA merger policy. |
Originally Posted by Sniper66
(Post 3022687)
so was ASA ACA AW MAG etc
their attitude is not acceptable ( whatever percentage of them) all regionals suck and that’s why they apply here sorry for the venting |
Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
(Post 3022706)
Regional a/c are 25% of United’s total fleet. The best solution to the current crisis is to merge all ALPA original date of hire seniority numbers across the regionals and mainline.
how about those who were at a regional let’s say 1988 what happen to that seniority If we do that all regional pilots or most but the 5 percent lifers would be on the street ... have you thought about that keep dreaming |
[QUOTE=airlinepilot50;3022706]Regional a/c are 25% of United’s total fleet. The best solution to the current crisis is to merge all ALPA original date of hire seniority numbers across the regionals and mainline.[/QUOTE
The best solution is for you to go post your BS on your airline's section on APC. You'll get much better traction there. |
Originally Posted by GPLD
(Post 3022717)
You're wrong.
not really ask pro standards but me and you know everything is confidential |
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
(Post 3022710)
Why? UAL doesn't want or need the 50 seaters in the current situation.
Personally, I would have loved DOH integration during the UAL/CAL merger but, alas, that's not part of ALPA merger policy. |
Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
(Post 3022747)
United wants larger regional a/c at regional pilot rates. They will succeed.
|
Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
(Post 3022706)
Regional a/c are 25% of United’s total fleet. The best solution to the current crisis is to merge all ALPA original date of hire seniority numbers across the regionals and mainline.
https://abc7chicago.com/news/letter-...ation/2023778/ |
Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
(Post 3022747)
United wants larger regional a/c at regional pilot rates. They will succeed.
|
Originally Posted by CousinEddie
(Post 3022763)
So come on over with no interview and established seniority? No probation? Don’t you think we should do a sit down interview / bad vibe check first? While every company has it’s all-stars, you try and filter them out first through a process. Exhibit A:
https://abc7chicago.com/news/letter-...ation/2023778/ |
Originally Posted by JoePatroni
(Post 3022754)
That's funny.
|
Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
(Post 3022777)
What power do you have? The government controls your company now.
|
Originally Posted by airlinepilot50
(Post 3022774)
Mainline hired you, so it’s obvious the process does not have a clean filter.
You definitely sound like express jet pilot that did not get hired by United go back to your airline boards please you make yourself look like a fool every time you say something kudos to United Interview team at TK !!!! |
Originally Posted by GPLD
(Post 3022717)
You're wrong.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:18 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands