Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   UAL rolls back plan to cut worker hours (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/129464-ual-rolls-back-plan-cut-worker-hours.html)

Stabilized 05-06-2020 09:01 AM

UAL rolls back plan to cut worker hours
 
*Plans to raise $2.25B through bond offering.
*Rolls back plan to cut work hours after lawsuits.

https://news.yahoo.com/united-airlines-offer-2-25-125704226.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=ma

O2pilot 05-06-2020 09:07 AM

[QUOTE=Stabilized;3050204]*Plans to raise $2.25B through bond offering.
*Rolls back plan to cut work hours after lawsuits.

https://news.yahoo.com/united-airlin...-sh&soc_trk=ma[/QUOTE]

Now they will just furlough them more aggressively.

Itsajob 05-06-2020 09:20 AM

Unlike pilots who create expensive and time consuming training cycles when we furlough, and do the same when we recall, these workers can be cut and brought back quickly. If we are 30-40% smaller on October 1, there could easily be 7,500-10,000 workers furloughed day one (based on the reported 25,000 number).

UAL97 05-06-2020 10:28 AM

Now how about a fight from ALPA to roll back pilot displacements? Isn't cutting thousands of pilots' pay from captain to first officer rates against the intent of the CARES Act as well? I gotta believe that's why no other airline has announced displacements as of yet.

Itsajob 05-06-2020 10:51 AM


Originally Posted by UAL97 (Post 3050271)
Now how about a fight from ALPA to roll back pilot displacements? Isn't cutting thousands of pilots' pay from captain to first officer rates against the intent of the CARES Act as well? I gotta believe that's why no other airline has announced displacements as of yet.

According to our union, no. Go read the email that the union put out yesterday. In the FAQ section they say that the company is prevented from changing the rates of pay in the UPA. The rate of pay that you were earning prior to the law taking effect can change if you change categories due to a displacement. The devil is in the details when it comes to laws, and this statute said that rates can’t be reduced, it does not state that employee income cannot be reduced. It stinks, but it is legal. It’s kind of like the 14th amendment never intended to create anchor babies, but if a woman violates federal law by entering the country illegally and has a kid, that kid is going to be given US citizenship. It never was the intent, but it is how the law is written.

piloto2 05-06-2020 11:00 AM


Originally Posted by Itsajob (Post 3050287)
It never was the intent, but it is how the law is written.

More precisely, it is how the law is interpreted by the courts. In this case, it's a question of how far do you want to push the issue. The CARES Act was rushed through, but I think the intent was to keep everyone whole until October. Barring some sort of epiphany from United management, the only recourses are political pressure or the government taking the money back or imposing a fine. The later is only going to make things worse for everyone. Interesting though that UAL is the only major going this route before October. I guess their lawyers are smarter...or more cunning!

bifff15 05-06-2020 03:47 PM

If I were a betting man I would think the others will be right on our heels to get the reshuffle started.

AxlF16 05-06-2020 04:17 PM


Originally Posted by bifff15 (Post 3050477)
If I were a betting man I would think the others will be right on our heels to get the reshuffle started.

I bet you're right. We're rightly proud of the UPA language that makes displacing pilots expensive and time consuming, so why be surprised when the company starts the process early...when they have little demand for pilots to fly the line...and training center capacity? Did anyone really think they were going to sit on their hands until Oct? Lets all hope that future bookings pick up substantially before the fall.

iahflyr 05-06-2020 05:29 PM


Now they will just furlough them more aggressively.
Yep. Smart move by American. They just hurt the balance sheet of one of their main competitors. Sucks for us...

Lou Turk 05-06-2020 06:22 PM


Originally Posted by iahflyr (Post 3050535)
Yep. Smart move by American. They just hurt the balance sheet of one of their main competitors. Sucks for us...

Yeah, smart move by American. Do you think Doug Parker conspired with IAM 141 and the represented United employees to hurt your balance sheet?

206321 05-06-2020 06:57 PM


Originally Posted by iahflyr (Post 3050535)
Yep. Smart move by American. They just hurt the balance sheet of one of their main competitors. Sucks for us...

More like dumb move by Kirby. No offense, but did he really think he was going to get away with this?

Take billions in tay payer dollars and then cut employee pay 25% through hours. Ridiculous. He is a weasel. Just watch out.

Glad everyone spoke out.

EWRflyr 05-08-2020 06:37 AM


Originally Posted by Itsajob (Post 3050287)
According to our union, no. Go read the email that the union put out yesterday. In the FAQ section they say that the company is prevented from changing the rates of pay in the UPA. The rate of pay that you were earning prior to the law taking effect can change if you change categories due to a displacement. The devil is in the details when it comes to laws, and this statute said that rates can’t be reduced, it does not state that employee income cannot be reduced. It stinks, but it is legal. It’s kind of like the 14th amendment never intended to create anchor babies, but if a woman violates federal law by entering the country illegally and has a kid, that kid is going to be given US citizenship. It never was the intent, but it is how the law is written.

Just as it was never the intent for any of the payroll grant provisions of the CARES Act to be loans. Congress negotiated a payroll grant provision and a separate loan provision with the understanding that the grants were "free money" for airlines to keep and use to pay employees and benefits. However, the law contained final language allowing the Treasury Secretary sole discretion to determine the payouts so hence we have 30% of the grant money actually being loans to the airlines. Many in congress came out saying that was not the intent, but unfortunately the language is the result. Would have been great if congress had asked what the total payroll costs were for each airline in that 2019 period and wrote the bill with 100% of that number as an unconditional grant. In a $2.2 trillion package, what's another $7-8 billion during this crisis. Unfortunately, that didn't happen and we are all living with this reality. Not unexpected that airline managements will be, well, airline management.

guppie 05-08-2020 05:55 PM

UAL couldn't sell those junk bonds for 9%. They couldn't even sell them at 11%. Scraped the whole thing. No deal. Hope the Gov'mt loan is enough. Scary and sad.

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/united-a...ints-1.1433725

jtriple7 05-08-2020 06:58 PM

Taking hours away from ops and then changing his mind a few days later makes Kirby look bad, they didnt think that the union IAM would take them to Federal court? - which IAM did. Company thought maybe ops people would just lay down and accept it? Company lawyers tell Kirby they would lose in court? A big Fail for one of Kirbys first moves as CEO.

Then a Fail on the bond sale.

Whats the next Fail?

BMEP100 05-08-2020 09:55 PM


Originally Posted by jtriple7 (Post 3052073)
Taking hours away from ops and then changing his mind a few days later makes Kirby look bad, they didnt think that the union IAM would take them to Federal court? - which IAM did. Company thought maybe ops people would just lay down and accept it? Company lawyers tell Kirby they would lose in court? A big Fail for one of Kirbys first moves as CEO.

Then a Fail on the bond sale.

Whats the next Fail?

Setting up a bond sale is not cheap. Nice chunk of cheese gone out the window. Only one making any money from this were the banksters.

Question is, “who in his right mind would think anyone would buy airline bonds right now”? They shoulda just saved that money for the Delaware lawyers.

Duckdude 05-09-2020 03:55 AM


Originally Posted by jtriple7 (Post 3052073)
Taking hours away from ops and then changing his mind a few days later makes Kirby look bad, they didnt think that the union IAM would take them to Federal court? - which IAM did. Company thought maybe ops people would just lay down and accept it? Company lawyers tell Kirby they would lose in court? A big Fail for one of Kirbys first moves as CEO.

Then a Fail on the bond sale.

Whats the next Fail?

Kirby is not the CEO yet.

guppie 05-09-2020 04:20 AM


Originally Posted by BMEP100 (Post 3052131)
Setting up a bond sale is not cheap. Nice chunk of cheese gone out the window. Only one making any money from this were the banksters.

Question is, “who in his right mind would think anyone would buy airline bonds right now”? They shoulda just saved that money for the Delaware lawyers.

Delta had no trouble selling 3.5B at 7%. He11, Carnival Cruise Lines sold 6B at 11.5%. 😯

bababouey 05-09-2020 04:35 AM


Originally Posted by guppie (Post 3052174)
Delta had no trouble selling 3.5B at 7%. He11, Carnival Cruise Lines sold 6B at 11.5%. 😯

financial times article said there was pushback on the collateral, I guess yall grouped all your old jets for this and they balked.

BMEP100 05-09-2020 06:13 AM


Originally Posted by guppie (Post 3052174)
Delta had no trouble selling 3.5B at 7%. He11, Carnival Cruise Lines sold 6B at 11.5%. 😯


Did the Delta sale actually execute? I don’t think so.

Their 3.4% dated 2023 are yielding 12%, selling for .80 cents....sooo

no 7% listed for sale.

guppie 05-09-2020 02:09 PM


Originally Posted by BMEP100 (Post 3052220)
Did the Delta sale actually execute? I don’t think so.

Their 3.4% dated 2023 are yielding 12%, selling for .80 cents....sooo

no 7% listed for sale.

Thats what I read in the WSJ. Didn’t actually check the ticker. Dang. 12% !!

BMEP100 05-09-2020 05:15 PM


Originally Posted by guppie (Post 3052528)
Thats what I read in the WSJ. Didn’t actually check the ticker. Dang. 12% !!

Result of the greater fool theory. Hate to be the one holding those bonds when the music stops.

Laminar 05-09-2020 05:20 PM

China will own all Americas jets

jtriple7 05-09-2020 05:52 PM

Kirby did take 20 work days - now unpaid away from management and admin between now and Oct 1.

Cosmo 05-10-2020 01:10 PM


Originally Posted by Itsajob (Post 3050287)
According to our union, no. Go read the email that the union put out yesterday. In the FAQ section they say that the company is prevented from changing the rates of pay in the UPA. The rate of pay that you were earning prior to the law taking effect can change if you change categories due to a displacement. The devil is in the details when it comes to laws, and this statute said that rates can’t be reduced, it does not state that employee income cannot be reduced. It stinks, but it is legal. It’s kind of like the 14th amendment never intended to create anchor babies, but if a woman violates federal law by entering the country illegally and has a kid, that kid is going to be given US citizenship. It never was the intent, but it is how the law is written.

I agree with UAL97. This is clearly not what the taxpayers expected. Employees that went out and campaigned for this support to the airline are now being undermined by laywer loophole tactics and shenanigan's. It's always fun to see trick plays in little league baseball...like when the pitcher hands off the ball to the first baseman...but let's be honest there are livelihoods at stake here and we all know management is grinning and saying "gotcha".

The union sends out a memo that says is perfectly legal to do what they are doing....thanks!!! It's not what was expected though and the American public needs to know this. The union should be slamming the company for these tactics in the media.

I'm ready to sign a petition against it, hopefully the Union will lead us.

guppie 05-10-2020 03:13 PM


Originally Posted by Cosmo (Post 3053092)
I agree with UAL97. This is clearly not what the taxpayers expected. Employees that went out and campaigned for this support to the airline are now being undermined by laywer loophole tactics and shenanigan's. It's always fun to see trick plays in little league baseball...like when the pitcher hands off the ball to the first baseman...but let's be honest there are livelihoods at stake here and we all know management is grinning and saying "gotcha".

The union sends out a memo that says is perfectly legal to do what they are doing....thanks!!! It's not what was expected though and the American public needs to know this. The union should be slamming the company for these tactics in the media.

I'm ready to sign a petition against it, hopefully the Union will lead us.

The union knows what is in the law, because we had guys in the room when it was being drafted. Who do you think got these employee provisions into the Cares Act? Without it, we would already have guys on the street. BACK the PAC.

Cosmo 05-10-2020 03:20 PM


Originally Posted by guppie (Post 3053141)
The union knows what is in the law, because we had guys in the room when it was being drafted. Who do you think got these employee provisions into the Cares Act? Without it, we would already have guys on the street. BACK the PAC.

Well then why are Delta, American and Southwest not playing these games?

Dave Fitzgerald 05-10-2020 03:26 PM


Originally Posted by Cosmo (Post 3053145)
Well then why are Delta, American and Southwest not playing these games?

Because we have Kirby.

Oletimer 05-10-2020 03:42 PM


Originally Posted by Duckdude (Post 3052165)
Kirby is not the CEO yet.

It seems everything that's going on is his call. maybe not on paper, or official change of command ceremony, but rest assured it's his show. might be the gong show, but it's his. oscar is just shadowing the operation and is the public face for now.

Oletimer 05-10-2020 03:46 PM


Originally Posted by guppie (Post 3053141)
The union knows what is in the law, because we had guys in the room when it was being drafted. Who do you think got these employee provisions into the Cares Act? Without it, we would already have guys on the street. BACK the PAC.

The union knew what was in the USSERA laws too. the union will pick its battles.

We ALL are full up dues paying members. I think 6K plus a year should more than qualify for backing all the PAC's.

guppie 05-10-2020 03:52 PM


Originally Posted by Cosmo (Post 3053145)
Well then why are Delta, American and Southwest not playing these games?


No idea. American is reportedly retiring the 330, 756, and E190 fleets, so there will definitely be some displacements. Maybe Delta and Southwest believe demand will come back much quicker. IDK. Kirby is either a genius or an idiot, time will tell.

guppie 05-10-2020 03:57 PM


Originally Posted by Oletimer (Post 3053164)
The union knew what was in the USSERA laws too. the union will pick its battles.

We ALL are full up dues paying members. I think 6K plus a year should more than qualify for backing all the PAC's.


ZERO dollars of your dues money can go to political donations. Period. That's federal law. So if you're not contributing, don't worry about it. We got you covered. But you might want to chip in. It's like career insurance.

PilotJ3 05-10-2020 08:36 PM


Originally Posted by guppie (Post 3053169)
No idea. American is reportedly retiring the 330, 756, and E190 fleets, so there will definitely be some displacements. Maybe Delta and Southwest believe demand will come back much quicker. IDK. Kirby is either a genius or an idiot, time will tell.

SK is a idiot. He’s not a good guy, he’s playing games with you guys. Stay strong...

UAL97 05-11-2020 01:31 PM


Originally Posted by PilotJ3 (Post 3053290)
SK is a idiot. He’s not a good guy, he’s playing games with you guys. Stay strong...

I agree at this point. He went from a "let's take over the airline industry" mindset when this first began to "let's make sure we are the first ones that can win the race in shrinking to profitability." He's already lost his credibility with me. You need leaders to lead in a crisis like this. Absolutely horrible timing to have this clown starting his first CEO job.

jtriple7 05-11-2020 01:53 PM

Admin and low management paychecks are 20/% smaller now.

Huell 05-11-2020 02:45 PM


Originally Posted by UAL97 (Post 3053707)
... He's already lost his credibility with me. You need leaders to lead in a crisis like this. Absolutely horrible timing to have this clown starting his first CEO job.

LOL ... For a second I thought you were referring to POTUS.

SlickMachine 05-11-2020 04:13 PM


Originally Posted by Huell (Post 3053747)
LOL ... For a second I thought you were referring to POTUS.

You missed the mark on that one.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:07 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands