![]() |
Originally Posted by sparrowhawk
(Post 3130746)
Can a probationary pilot vote for this TA?
Hey just wanna say, WOW your crystal ball is not bad my friend. Nice work last March. Unfortunately you were very right. |
Originally Posted by rvfanatic
(Post 3130690)
24 months of cuts for 8 mos, 3:1 advantage to management and the pilots even agreed to pay for those 8 months for us Bob!
if and when we fly more the first 2/3 MPG improves accordingly so that hit (yes it’s a hit) becomes less. if we’re still still under 40% or less in 24 months you and me and just about everyone is going to have a less than fun outcome no matter what contract or TA we’re under. |
Originally Posted by huell
(Post 3130727)
yeah ... But you got to admit she is hot!
|
I find it a bit ironic that a group of right leaning pilots would be so quick to join in support of a socialistic concept such as this TA...,
I guess your ideology can get kind of fuzzy when you’re on the receiving end... Thank you C12 for doing the right thing and not jumping in line. Leadership..... Hope the moderators take a good look at your personal insults... maybe we’ll get a vacation from your BS |
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3130490)
Pay rate protection. Section F2 says that to be pay protected you have to have a 100% vacancy bid in to qualify. They use the example of someone displaced out of SFO 737 CA, that person would have to have a bid for SFO 737 CA at 100% to qualify. How do pilots displaced when bases closed in meet these requirements? A displaced IAH 777 pilot, or a LAX 756 pilot can’t bid their former BES if it no longer exists.
What happens to my “carve out” displacement pay protection if the company decides to park a fleet, Airbus, and my 100% Capt vacancy bid? The TA lists no “trigger” for parking a fleet. |
Originally Posted by Poss
(Post 3130670)
This is a huge point. Airlines will be scrambling for market share. There will a blood bath of fare sales. Who has the cash to endure cheap tickets and grab market share? Southwest. The airlines know revenue recovery is far off on the horizon.
24 mos of cuts for 9 mos of furlough protection |
Originally Posted by copy
(Post 3130751)
Whoa...you got unbanned?? Congrats!!
Originally Posted by BobbyLeeSwagger
(Post 3130764)
Hey just wanna say, WOW your crystal ball is not bad my friend. Nice work last March. Unfortunately you were very right.
|
Originally Posted by sparrowhawk
(Post 3130746)
Can a probationary pilot vote for this TA?
|
Originally Posted by Sixty N Two
(Post 3130787)
Paragraph K.2 does need the ALPA finance guy to explain what this means on the virtual road show. He’s the only one on any of the zoom love-a-thons the union has put out that’s been an effective communicator. Not saying it’s a deal breaker but I have a feeling it means we will have this TA for the full 2 years. Assume that and decide I guess.
|
Originally Posted by rvfanatic
(Post 3130818)
That’s my going in assumption, full two years of this TA for those left on property and 8 months of the TA for the bottom 2850 or so.
|
Originally Posted by Huell
(Post 3130727)
Yeah ... but you got to admit she is hot!
|
Originally Posted by vipereaglebus
(Post 3130647)
How about this nugget they slid in there. A BRAND NEW paragraph as it relates to middle seat pay:
5-C-1-g-(1) Notwithstanding section 5-C-3, a pilot may be re-seated out of an Economy Plus middle seat into an Economy Plus aisle or window seat if such seat is made or becomes available (due to any reason) prior to Departure. So the gate agent can tap you on the shoulder just prior to door close and give you a misconnect's window seat. I'm not sure if this was allowed before (it's never happened to me like that), but there's a reason the company added this language....and it will likely stay in our contract for a looong time. I can’t even begin to understand why you are upset about what this paragraph says......only seat on the jet is middle and the agent gives you a window and you are going to be ****ed? |
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 3130853)
I can’t even begin to understand why you are upset about what this paragraph says......only seat on the jet is middle and the agent gives you a window and you are going to be ****ed?
|
Originally Posted by AxlF16
(Post 3130861)
Are you assuming they'll tell you when they re-seat you in the computer? Can you imagine being denied middle seat pay after actually sitting in 9B during the flight because the computer says 21A? Nevermind, I'm sure that would never happen.
If you want to feel like a victim, there are 1000 places to feel mistreated in this job. Starting with things that actually matter, like every single health study that sites regular sleep cycles as one of the best things you can do health wise after managing weight and getting your heart rate up. |
Originally Posted by duvie
(Post 3130846)
if the company furloughs more than magic 2007, Then the TA (LOA) is void for all of us
|
Originally Posted by duvie
(Post 3130901)
Axl, if this happened to me, I’d grieve it and explain that I was never reseated and I’m 95% sure I’d get paid. And in that particular situation the fault lies with the gate agent, not the pilot pay person or pilot. is it annoying… Yes. But for potentially $500 after taxes… I will take the 20 minutes to grieve it. I have found that if things are done in good faith on my end, I am always paid per the contract. YMMV. One of my best friends works for AA and that is certainly not his experience.
If you want to feel like a victim, there are 1000 places to feel mistreated in this job. Starting with things that actually matter, like every single health study that sites regular sleep cycles as one of the best things you can do health wise after managing weight and getting your heart rate up. [/QUOTE] 5-C-1-g-(1) Notwithstanding section 5-C-3, a pilot may be re-seated out of an Economy Plus middle seat into an Economy Plus aisle or window seat if such seat is made or becomes available (due to any reason) prior to Departure [QUOTE] |
Originally Posted by AxlF16
(Post 3130861)
Are you assuming they'll tell you when they re-seat you in the computer? Can you imagine being denied middle seat pay after actually sitting in 9B during the flight because the computer says 21A? Nevermind, I'm sure that would never happen.
|
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 3131046)
That is some serious tin foil hat stuff there Axl......I get the skepticism but I feel like you are down a rabbit hole here. Like Duvie said grieve it and if you are truly that mistrusting then snap a picture of the seat you gave on the United app. Every seat change has a traceable time stamp.
[/QUOTE] f such seat is made or becomes available (due to any reason) prior to Departure[QUOTE] You can call it tinfoil league I guess, but the language is clear in what it says - and what it doesn't say. I guess we'll see what happens if the TA passes.. Tinfoil hats aside,, are you really this trusting of management? |
Originally Posted by AxlF16
(Post 3131051)
There certainly are timestamps. Perhaps that's why you see the new language?
You can call it tinfoil league I guess, but the language is clear in what it says - and what it doesn't say. I guess we'll see what happens if the TA passes.. Tinfoil hats aside,, are you really this trusting of management?[/QUOTE] not necesarily I just think this would be a very easy win for the grievance committee and I think the company has better things to do then change seats at the last minute to force you to sit in a middle seat for free. that language wasn’t written by the company because quite frankly they could care less what seat you sit in in economy. That was written to prevent a gate agent from saying I’m to busy to switch your seat goodbye. |
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 3131062)
f such seat is made or becomes available (due to any reason) prior to Departure[QUOTE]
You can call it tinfoil league I guess, but the language is clear in what it says - and what it doesn't say. I guess we'll see what happens if the TA passes.. Tinfoil hats aside,, are you really this trusting of management? that language wasn’t written by the company because quite frankly they could care less what seat you sit in in economy. That was written to prevent a gate agent from saying I’m to busy to switch your seat goodbye.[/QUOTE] Did your LEC rep verify how that language got included? I hope your read is correct. |
Originally Posted by oldmako
(Post 3130459)
From the other forum...the OTHER, other forum, the NEW one...he's a smelly nugget...
"...if a Trip for that Category cannot be assigned without disruption of days off, the number of disrupted days off shall be no more than four (4) days per assignment." Can you throw me a reference on that exact verbiage. I’m looking through the full TA and am not seeing it. |
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 3131568)
Dude,
Can you throw me a reference on that exact verbiage. I’m looking through the full TA and am not seeing it. |
Originally Posted by libertyrisk
(Post 3131569)
I. Work Reductions 3.a.v. (pg 9)
filler........... |
Originally Posted by oldmako
(Post 3130459)
From the other forum...the OTHER, other forum, the NEW one...he's a smelly nugget...
"...if a Trip for that Category cannot be assigned without disruption of days off, the number of disrupted days off shall be no more than four (4) days per assignment." So now, every reserve, Basic or Global, can be assigned a 5 day trip on their last day of reserve. And they can do this as many times as they want–all they have do is shuffle your remaining RDOs. Bye bye Basic HDOs. This is a HUGE concession for all the Basic reserves." |
Where is the dissenting opinion (from the 3 no votes) that was customary in previous contract votes? It's been a total "Yes" sales job...
|
Originally Posted by Sparta
(Post 3132401)
Where is the dissenting opinion (from the 3 no votes) that was customary in previous contract votes? It's been a total "Yes" sales job...
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:08 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands