Search
Notices

MOAB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-26-2021, 10:30 AM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,609
Default

One “threat” is the highly probable need to attend LDQ every 90 days while on probation. Highlighting yourself for poor flying will land them in additional training, documentation, and unnecessary scrutiny. A New Hire getting a flying ID is not likely and sitting as a bunkie is not “flying” in my book. If I were a NH I’d go to the 320/737 and enjoy your probation year flying the line… then bid up on their terms. To each their own…
ugleeual is offline  
Old 07-26-2021, 10:40 AM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,219
Default

Originally Posted by ugleeual View Post
One “threat” is the highly probable need to attend LDQ every 90 days while on probation. Highlighting yourself for poor flying will land them in additional training, documentation, and unnecessary scrutiny. A New Hire getting a flying ID is not likely and sitting as a bunkie is not “flying” in my book. If I were a NH I’d go to the 320/737 and enjoy your probation year flying the line… then bid up on their terms. To each their own…
Landings class is about the easiest sim session that you could ever have. If a pilot can’t handle a V1 cut in a 777, they have no business in a 737 or 320. The daily grind and having some grumpy captain fill out a probationary report is probably a bigger risk. I’ll agree that bunkie on the 777 isn’t really “flying”, but once you have a seniority number at a legacy, it isn’t about flying, it’s about time off and getting paid.
Hedley is offline  
Old 07-26-2021, 10:46 AM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,609
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley View Post
Landings class is about the easiest sim session that you could ever have. If a pilot can’t handle a V1 cut in a 777, they have no business in a 737 or 320. The daily grind and having some grumpy captain fill out a probationary report is probably a bigger risk. I’ll agree that bunkie on the 777 isn’t really “flying”, but once you have a seniority number at a legacy, it isn’t about flying, it’s about time off and getting paid.
I’ve been paired up with ‘professional’ bunkies on the 777 who failed CQMVs and CQLOEs due to poor flying skills… pilots with 5+ years on the plane.
ugleeual is offline  
Old 07-26-2021, 10:56 AM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,219
Default

Originally Posted by ugleeual View Post
I’ve been paired up with ‘professional’ bunkies on the 777 who failed CQMVs and CQLOEs due to poor flying skills… pilots with 5+ years on the plane.
I have too, but their problems were usually self induced. They never cracked a book or even remotely paid attention when flying. I seldom saw the front seat on the 777 but I kept up with bulletins and tried to be an active member of the crew when on a trip. Landings classes and recurrent training was a breeze. The 777 is almost idiot proof, but there are always a few who prove incapable of flying a plane that does everything for you. Screwing up a V1 cut with TAC, showing up to training not knowing flows, immediate action items, and limitations is mind boggling.
Hedley is offline  
Old 07-26-2021, 11:10 AM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,709
Default

Originally Posted by CousinEddie View Post
And then they show up for landings class and wow everyone in the sim. Hoss?
The stories I could tell…..


And I’m guessing Kona was joking but the Hogan doesn’t weed out chit.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 07-26-2021, 11:26 AM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flightmedic01's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Reclining
Posts: 840
Default

Originally Posted by okieskies99 View Post
WB flying is not hard. There have already been relatively new hires go to the 777 and 787. Honestly, grinding 4-leg days in the Airbus out of EWR with a new captain that hasn't been a captain in 5-20 years is probably far "harder" on someone than flying a 777 one leg to anywhere. The USAF has guys flying C-17 and C-5's right out of UPT. I imagine a 777 in indoc might go senior to someone that's been in the industry for 15-20 years. The worst part for the company might be someone "unproven" at a legacy spend their first year in the bunk.
True. I will also say that flying as a Captain with an F/O that was hired right into a widebody and then goes to a narrowbody has its challenges. Different kind of flying and more “labor intensive”. A widebody F/O that has never flown narrowbody type of flying will have their work cutout when they upgrade to the Bus or Guppy.
flightmedic01 is offline  
Old 07-26-2021, 11:59 AM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 783
Default

The 73 right seat and the way we run the cockpit is probably the busiest seat at United. If upgrade is going to be in the 2-3 yr range it is important to respect how much the fo is doing. At previous airlines I saw people that weren't first officers long enough upgrade and just micromanage and abuse first officers with zero empathy. Not saying it will happen here but right seat time is a great learning tool to figure out the United way to do things.

The unfilled 777 spots are due to the fuzzy timeline on the pratts. I don't think they could get them all back in the timeline that was thrown around with or without the fan cowl issue. Lesser points are the huge question mark of China flying returning, cargo possibility if china doesn't come back, and the fact that the 787 is the moneymaker currently with lines in the 80's. I wouldn't be surprised to see the g line in the 50-60% range until next spring which would be hard on every commuter.
Aquaticus is offline  
Old 07-26-2021, 12:01 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,219
Default

Originally Posted by flightmedic01 View Post
True. I will also say that flying as a Captain with an F/O that was hired right into a widebody and then goes to a narrowbody has its challenges. Different kind of flying and more “labor intensive”. A widebody F/O that has never flown narrowbody type of flying will have their work cutout when they upgrade to the Bus or Guppy.
Getting bumped back to the 737 proved to be a lot of work during training, and line flying is much more labor intensive. It has reaffirmed my original plan of sitting on a WB until I can upgrade with enough seniority to avoid South America and Hawaii, or retire, which ever happens first. Many of us have zero desire to be a NB captain and won’t have to face the challenges of NB upgrade. The small raise isn’t worth all of the extra days on the road or the amount of work that domestic flying involves. I’m glad we have options here.
Hedley is offline  
Old 07-26-2021, 12:08 PM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2019
Posts: 432
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley View Post
Getting bumped back to the 737 proved to be a lot of work during training, and line flying is much more labor intensive. It has reaffirmed my original plan of sitting on a WB until I can upgrade with enough seniority to avoid South America and Hawaii, or retire, which ever happens first. Many of us have zero desire to be a NB captain and won’t have to face the challenges of NB upgrade. The small raise isn’t worth all of the extra days on the road or the amount of work that domestic flying involves. I’m glad we have options here.
I really like this post, because the other day I was speaking with my friend at an LCC. He’s been there maybe 5.5 years and has been a captain for the last 2 years or so. He is already burned out with the day to day grind that they do. He also feels the general skill set and attitude of newer pilots is poor. The point he made that he has nothing more than this to look forward to for the next 25 years before retirement really stuck with me and made me that much more grateful for all the options we have here.
JimLaheyTPS is offline  
Old 07-26-2021, 01:32 PM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,709
Default

The best thing that ever happened to me for F/O workload awareness was spending 2 years in the left seat then getting bounced back to the right seat. It’s easy to forget what the workload and pacing is like for an F/O when sitting in the left seat.
Airhoss is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DrunkIrishman
Delta
141
07-12-2018 01:03 PM
purplepilot
Cargo
106
09-03-2007 08:20 PM
Stork
Cargo
45
08-20-2007 04:42 PM
Whale Pilot
Cargo
43
04-25-2007 11:28 AM
dckozak
Cargo
15
04-18-2006 05:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices