![]() |
C11 LEC Chair Changes his mind
C11 Special Update: From the Chair
Dear Members of Council 11, I have received a lot of feedback on the Tentative Agreement, and I hear you all loud and clear. I spoke with many of you and had very productive and respectful conversations about this agreement. I appreciate your thoughts and opinions very much. During these discussions, you brought thoughtful points to the table and expressed serious concerns over the flaws you see in this TA. The feedback I'm receiving is overwhelmingly negative. It would be negligent of me not to reexamine my reasoning. The briefings to the MEC and information presented to us in closed session focused on a very detailed breakdown of negotiations and the general economic conditions of our industry that I used in considering this TA. I do believe there are some good things in this agreement. But after reexamination, it is not nearly enough to put the United Pilots at the top of the industry where we belong. The most important aspect of what I do is to represent you, the members of Council 11. I voted to approve the TA and bring it to membership ratification. As stated earlier, listening to you and accepting your feedback, this agreement clearly misses your mark. I apologize for that. Moving forward, nothing short of a true industry leading contract will get a yes vote from me at the MEC. Integrity and accountability are tenants I strive to live by and uphold and I thank you for your candid conversations and your support. I expect to be held accountable. I realize this is not the agreement the United Pilots deserve. When I cast the vote that counts -my own- I'll be voting NO on this TA. Respectfully, Jim Jim Crytser C11 Chairman Captain Representative |
Originally Posted by 5spot
(Post 3450595)
C11 Special Update: From the Chair
Dear Members of Council 11, I have received a lot of feedback on the Tentative Agreement, and I hear you all loud and clear. I spoke with many of you and had very productive and respectful conversations about this agreement. I appreciate your thoughts and opinions very much. During these discussions, you brought thoughtful points to the table and expressed serious concerns over the flaws you see in this TA. The feedback I'm receiving is overwhelmingly negative. It would be negligent of me not to reexamine my reasoning. The briefings to the MEC and information presented to us in closed session focused on a very detailed breakdown of negotiations and the general economic conditions of our industry that I used in considering this TA. I do believe there are some good things in this agreement. But after reexamination, it is not nearly enough to put the United Pilots at the top of the industry where we belong. The most important aspect of what I do is to represent you, the members of Council 11. I voted to approve the TA and bring it to membership ratification. As stated earlier, listening to you and accepting your feedback, this agreement clearly misses your mark. I apologize for that. Moving forward, nothing short of a true industry leading contract will get a yes vote from me at the MEC. Integrity and accountability are tenants I strive to live by and uphold and I thank you for your candid conversations and your support. I expect to be held accountable. I realize this is not the agreement the United Pilots deserve. When I cast the vote that counts -my own- I'll be voting NO on this TA. Respectfully, Jim Jim Crytser C11 Chairman Let’s face it you might be voting no now as an individual but you voted for a T/A that takes union jobs from union members at the “qualified” opinion of management. You sir simply need to step down. I have no desire to give you another chance to **** my QOL at this airline and destroy union member jobs. If this passes you will go down in history as a union rep that destroyed this airline as a solid career place to work. So average Joe line pilots made you see the light?!? Really? Maybe you should have polled the pilots over these years instead of letting Insler just giving you a place to eat some free food and get you some FPL from trips to sit around for some briefings from soon to be management wanna be types. Just resign and the sooner the better!! |
Originally Posted by CALPilotToo
(Post 3450599)
So WTF have we been paying you FPL to oversee the NC and the MC and then many days reviewing this with SMEs etc.?
Let’s face it you might be voting no now as an individual but you voted for a T/A that takes union jobs from union members at the “qualified” opinion of management. You sir simply need to step down. I have no desire to give you another chance to **** my QOL at this airline and destroy union member jobs. If this passes you will go down in history as a union rep that destroyed this airline as a solid career place to work. So average Joe line pilots made you see the light?!? Really? Maybe you should have polled the pilots over these years instead of letting Insler just giving you a place to eat some free food and get you some FPL from trips to sit around for some briefings from soon to be management wanna be types. Just resign and the sooner the better!! I must admit I am impressed by the listing of the name, email etc. of the OP. But have to agree with you. Resignation is necessary. Voting for what I know of your TA (and I haven’t read it in it’s entirety) in any form as elected union representative would require no less if presented to me. |
Pardon the intrusion as a SWA guy, but I’ve read more than a few posts saying the UAL pilot group was only polled once about this contract and that was in 2019. Just to put that in perspective, at SWA we have been been polled what seems like twice a year for the last four years, even pre-opener to see what this pilot groups wants/needs/desires are for our next contract. I feel like our BOD (SWA’s name for our MEC) has a very good sense of this pilot group. How is the UAL MEC/Negotiating Committee negotiating for what you want when they don’t seem to know what that is?
|
Originally Posted by dracir1
(Post 3450611)
F9guy here - no dog in the fight other than industry interests….
I must admit I am impressed by the listing of the name, email etc. of the OP. But have to agree with you. Resignation is necessary. Voting for what I know of your TA (and I haven’t read it in it’s entirety) in any form as elected union representative would require no less if presented to me. |
Originally Posted by Dirkkdiggler
(Post 3450618)
Pardon the intrusion as a SWA guy, but I’ve read more than a few posts saying the UAL pilot group was only polled once about this contract and that was in 2019. Just to put that in perspective, at SWA we have been been polled what seems like twice a year for the last four years, even pre-opener to see what this pilot groups wants/needs/desires are for our next contract. I feel like our BOD (SWA’s name for our MEC) has a very good sense of this pilot group. How is the UAL MEC/Negotiating Committee negotiating for what you want when they don’t seem to know what that is?
|
Originally Posted by CALPilotToo
(Post 3450620)
Just ducking for cover is all he’s doing now. And is the second one to cave to reality. This is a last ditch effort to go out with some dignity or fingers crossed he doesn’t get recalled. Simply needs to step down. Any union rep that supports replacing union member jobs with non members should be kicked out of the union entirely but unfortunately ALPA won’t have the guts to call this out for what it is. Jobs were promised here to get this huge item. This passes and 400 union jobs will be gone in 5-8 years.
|
Originally Posted by 5spot
(Post 3450631)
who was the other to cave? Have not heard of that one yet. Hoping this is 1 of many. Recall resolutions are ready to go.
|
Where in the hell is C11?
|
Originally Posted by fadec
(Post 3450637)
Where in the hell is C11?
Their FO rep Anne voted NO from the start. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:15 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands