Age 67
#181
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 432
New laws protecting pensions in case of BK since 2005. Company contributions would be frozen and distributed. The 401k is fine but no reason to not have more company $$$ going toward a retirement plan. Annuities would be 100% in your name and protected from BK. Not talking about giving up anything already in place just adding another bucket of cash. Who's not for that?
Pensions are for people who can’t handle their own money or those within a few years of retirement who would get a fully funded pension on the backs of the rest of us.
#182
Any negotiating capital/dollar amount spent on a retirement scheme I would rather see in cash as a higher hourly. I can invest my own money. I don’t need the company to do it for me and I guarantee the extra hourly rate the next 30 or so years will net me a far nicer retirement than any company scheme.
Pensions are for people who can’t handle their own money or those within a few years of retirement who would get a fully funded pension on the backs of the rest of us.
Pensions are for people who can’t handle their own money or those within a few years of retirement who would get a fully funded pension on the backs of the rest of us.
#184
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 432
¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
Not my fault if people go out and spend that theoretical raise on a boat. I won’t vote for something that would handicap my own retirement to help people too irresponsible to save their own money. Anyone in this industry at a legacy struggling to retire these days has done it to themselves.
No one is looking out for my retirement except for me. I’m just returning the favor.
Not my fault if people go out and spend that theoretical raise on a boat. I won’t vote for something that would handicap my own retirement to help people too irresponsible to save their own money. Anyone in this industry at a legacy struggling to retire these days has done it to themselves.
No one is looking out for my retirement except for me. I’m just returning the favor.
#185
Stop all the nonsense talk. IATA is pressuring ICAO as we speak to adopt 67. There goes ALPAs BS talking point. On top of that the majority of pilots want beaurcrats out of our profession. Only ALPA that is nothing more than a lobby group now ( hardly a union given the last TA) is opposed to 67. They don't even have the guts to conduct a 67 poll with their own membership. Dems will be blamed for every late and canceled flight if they don't get on board . Not smart politically and that's all they look at. Mayor Pete is starting to come around given the " brittle" comment. Next thing after brittle is broken. He doesn't want this on his watch if running for POTUS. 67 within next 6 months will happen if not sooner.
Keep fighting the good fight via senseless APC posts, you’re making a difference!
#186
Banned
Joined APC: May 2022
Posts: 411
Age 67? IATA wants age mandate GONE
The International Air Transport Association (IATA) representing almost 300 carriers around the world has submitted a paper to the ICAO General Assembly which suggests removing the age limit for pilots. Next September in Montreal, ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) will hold its General Assembly, a plenary meeting occurring every three years where all Member States gather to discuss and vote on new provisions to regulate international commercial aviation.
“With demand for air travel anticipated to return to [pre-pandemic] traffic levels in 2023, and then continue on an upward growth path, the demand for commercial pilots is expected to exceed supply,” says the IATA paper as reported by Flightglobal.
“It is therefore timely to revisit legacy age limitation requirements to ensure that they remain fit for purpose, do not represent an unjustified barrier to employment for these critical workers and do [not] constitute de facto age discrimination.”
According to a document published by EASA (European Aviation and Space Agency), Canada, New Zealand, and Australia do not have any age limits for pilots, Japan has increased the mandatory retirement age to 68, while European countries, as well as the United States, have maintained their age limit at 60, although some E.U. member states have filed for
“With demand for air travel anticipated to return to [pre-pandemic] traffic levels in 2023, and then continue on an upward growth path, the demand for commercial pilots is expected to exceed supply,” says the IATA paper as reported by Flightglobal.
“It is therefore timely to revisit legacy age limitation requirements to ensure that they remain fit for purpose, do not represent an unjustified barrier to employment for these critical workers and do [not] constitute de facto age discrimination.”
According to a document published by EASA (European Aviation and Space Agency), Canada, New Zealand, and Australia do not have any age limits for pilots, Japan has increased the mandatory retirement age to 68, while European countries, as well as the United States, have maintained their age limit at 60, although some E.U. member states have filed for
#188
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Position: B-737 Captain
Posts: 649
Well, it's been 4 months since Lindsay and his republican cosponsors introduced the age 67 legislation to try and bail out the Airlines, and like I said... It hasn't even made it out of committee. Now with the Dems controlling the Senate for at least TWO MORE YEARS 🤙🏼🤙🏼,
age 67 is dead. Enjoy and remember.....
BACK THE PAC
age 67 is dead. Enjoy and remember.....
BACK THE PAC
#190
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Position: Power Isosceles
Posts: 119
Well, it's been 4 months since Lindsay and his republican cosponsors introduced the age 67 legislation to try and bail out the Airlines, and like I said... It hasn't even made it out of committee. Now with the Dems controlling the Senate for at least TWO MORE YEARS 🤙🏼🤙🏼,
age 67 is dead. Enjoy and remember.....
BACK THE PAC
age 67 is dead. Enjoy and remember.....
BACK THE PAC
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post