![]() |
Captain Unfilled and Rates
I think they could entice more pilots to bid captain if they raise captain rates a lot more than FOs.
|
Originally Posted by Gooselives
(Post 3487078)
I think they could entice more pilots to bid captain if they raise captain rates a lot more than FOs.
|
Originally Posted by JTwift
(Post 3487087)
no, they need to make reserve suck way less. It’s not just the money.
|
Originally Posted by Gooselives
(Post 3487093)
Any ideas?
|
Originally Posted by serce
(Post 3487101)
How about reserve rules at least as good as the regionals? I am kind of joking but really... I don't know of any other airline out there with global reserve.
Sent from my Pixel 6a using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Gooselives
(Post 3487093)
Any ideas?
The NC negotiated for "reserve improvements" interpreted to mean "increased transparency and predictability". They used predictive human behavior in response to financial incentive to get the UPA changes they thought would achieve those results but it effectively is still a gamble that the group would have to accept and see how it plays out. There were no guarantees of the outcome. I don't want a contract that incentivizes certain behaviors over others to achieve a result - I want a contract that specifically says what the company can/can't do to mess with my life on reserve. |
Originally Posted by FlewNavy
(Post 3487131)
More days off where you are untouchable by the company and have enough time before you start a work block to plan/execute a commute from anywhere you choose to live. Period. Days off per month for a RSV needs to be the same as the average days off for a line holder.
The NC negotiated for "reserve improvements" interpreted to mean "increased transparency and predictability". They used predictive human behavior in response to financial incentive to get the UPA changes they thought would achieve those results but it effectively is still a gamble that the group would have to accept and see how it plays out. There were no guarantees of the outcome. I don't want a contract that incentivizes certain behaviors over others to achieve a result - I want a contract that specifically says what the company can/can't do to mess with my life on reserve. Increase add pay for early assignments, but make it APU only. Or, allow for bidding “in base RSV” blocks (early start late finish) that credit higher than “commuter RSV” blocks (1000 start 1700 finish). SC & FSB are useful- improve add pay but add default frequency caps that can be waived by the pilot. Add the option of bidding different RSV schedules for different credit. (16 days off at 70MPG up to 10 off at 90MPG, for example.) Ultimately what you’re going to find is some guys will bid max everything & chase add pay while others will take min credit to stay home more. Leave it flexible to the pilot & many more will start taking open upgrades. |
Originally Posted by Gooselives
(Post 3487093)
Any ideas?
Max of 16 reserve days Ability to trade reserve days by computer |
The problem is that any improvements apply to all reserves across the system with associated high costs while we have “only” 100 unfilled CA spots in select bases
part of the challenge is that our pay cannot be differentiated by location - the way it is done anywhere else incl the military and gov jobs |
Originally Posted by TFAYD
(Post 3487181)
The problem is that any improvements apply to all reserves across the system with associated high costs while we have “only” 100 unfilled CA spots in select bases
part of the challenge is that our pay cannot be differentiated by location - the way it is done anywhere else incl the military and gov jobs |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:31 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands