UAL vs AA
#1
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Aug 2022
Posts: 75
UAL vs AA
Hey everyone, I recently started a similar thread on the AA side, but wanted to make sure I am getting both perspectives. If you responded in the other thread, thank you and feel free to ignore this if you’d like.
I personally am in the PA/NJ area, so EWR and PHL are very accessible, with JFK/LGA being more of a fringe possibility.
The way I see it, both have certain advantages…
UAL:
- Good seniority progression (despite having hired ~3000-4000 since covid)
- EWR is a key hub with more flying opportunities than PHL
- Insane amount of wide bodies/orders (wide body flying high priority)
- Less current debt
- Clearest vision for expansion going forward
AA:
- Seems to have best upward seniority mobility for a person in mid to late 20’s
- PHL most accessible to me
- Possibly easier to pursue opportunities in addition to line flying given shorter drive to PHL
- Greatest number of good bases (by a long shot)
- New fleet, so likely to accrue least amount of debt going forward
They both seem to be roughly the same in terms of quality of life at the moment, despite their differences.
Both are great potential paths, so I am curious if anyone with more experience than I has any input as to whether my perception of things is accurate. As always, it’s appreciated.
I personally am in the PA/NJ area, so EWR and PHL are very accessible, with JFK/LGA being more of a fringe possibility.
The way I see it, both have certain advantages…
UAL:
- Good seniority progression (despite having hired ~3000-4000 since covid)
- EWR is a key hub with more flying opportunities than PHL
- Insane amount of wide bodies/orders (wide body flying high priority)
- Less current debt
- Clearest vision for expansion going forward
AA:
- Seems to have best upward seniority mobility for a person in mid to late 20’s
- PHL most accessible to me
- Possibly easier to pursue opportunities in addition to line flying given shorter drive to PHL
- Greatest number of good bases (by a long shot)
- New fleet, so likely to accrue least amount of debt going forward
They both seem to be roughly the same in terms of quality of life at the moment, despite their differences.
Both are great potential paths, so I am curious if anyone with more experience than I has any input as to whether my perception of things is accurate. As always, it’s appreciated.
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,218
Hey everyone, I recently started a similar thread on the AA side, but wanted to make sure I am getting both perspectives. If you responded in the other thread, thank you and feel free to ignore this if you’d like.
I personally am in the PA/NJ area, so EWR and PHL are very accessible, with JFK/LGA being more of a fringe possibility.
The way I see it, both have certain advantages…
UAL:
- Good seniority progression (despite having hired ~3000-4000 since covid)
- EWR is a key hub with more flying opportunities than PHL
- Insane amount of wide bodies/orders (wide body flying high priority)
- Less current debt
- Clearest vision for expansion going forward
AA:
- Seems to have best upward seniority mobility for a person in mid to late 20’s
- PHL most accessible to me
- Possibly easier to pursue opportunities in addition to line flying given shorter drive to PHL
- Greatest number of good bases (by a long shot)
- New fleet, so likely to accrue least amount of debt going forward
They both seem to be roughly the same in terms of quality of life at the moment, despite their differences.
Both are great potential paths, so I am curious if anyone with more experience than I has any input as to whether my perception of things is accurate. As always, it’s appreciated.
I personally am in the PA/NJ area, so EWR and PHL are very accessible, with JFK/LGA being more of a fringe possibility.
The way I see it, both have certain advantages…
UAL:
- Good seniority progression (despite having hired ~3000-4000 since covid)
- EWR is a key hub with more flying opportunities than PHL
- Insane amount of wide bodies/orders (wide body flying high priority)
- Less current debt
- Clearest vision for expansion going forward
AA:
- Seems to have best upward seniority mobility for a person in mid to late 20’s
- PHL most accessible to me
- Possibly easier to pursue opportunities in addition to line flying given shorter drive to PHL
- Greatest number of good bases (by a long shot)
- New fleet, so likely to accrue least amount of debt going forward
They both seem to be roughly the same in terms of quality of life at the moment, despite their differences.
Both are great potential paths, so I am curious if anyone with more experience than I has any input as to whether my perception of things is accurate. As always, it’s appreciated.
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 157
For someone in their mid to late twenties, the differences between the big 3 will most likely be a wash over a long career. If flying wide bodies is your primary goal, then UA would be the obvious choice. For everything else you mentioned, I’d go to AA. If I was in your shoes, a base that is close and others that you’d be willing to live in would weigh much more than wide body flying.
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,897
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Posts: 856
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,897
When an airline has a significant majority of the flights to/from a hub. At one point in time AA and its regionals had 75% of PHL flying. There’s significantly less PHL AA mainline since they parked all of the 756 and 330 fleets.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EngineOut
Regional
153
05-10-2017 10:12 AM