![]() |
Self Selecting
Why do you keep deleting threads where the bigots, racists, xenophobes, and other small minded jagoffs out themselves?
|
The last one was at the request of the OP, who apparently had a change of heart.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3620980)
The last one was at the request of the OP, who apparently had a change of heart.
|
Originally Posted by AxlF16
(Post 3620979)
Why do you keep deleting threads where the bigots, racists, xenophobes, and other small minded jagoffs out themselves?
|
Originally Posted by Pro2nd
(Post 3621199)
Always with the name calling.
|
Originally Posted by Monkeyfly
(Post 3621267)
He's just outing himself
|
Originally Posted by AxlF16
(Post 3621268)
By all means, please share your feelings.
|
Originally Posted by Finessed
(Post 3621271)
$20 and a cold one says you routinely inhale your own farts to save the environment. Scotty boy would be almost as proud as when you’re licking his boots. We got ourselves a real company man right here folks.
|
The delta boards are stale. Let’s check out the United boards. Glad I did. I too enjoy smelling my own farts. Everyone loves their own brand!
|
I wonder what effect identity politics has on collective bargaining and the ability of the group to use leverage?
In my opinion we struggle using leverage. We can blame Kirby all we want, but we are the ones with our lips still firmly attached to Kirby's keister. There is a reason identity politics are encouraged by our management, and it isn't to liberate the employee group. ALPA should concentrate on collective bargaining and strengthening the interests of it's membership, which are the same regardless of which toxic identities we individually choose. |
does anyone know what AxlF16 is complaining about?
|
Originally Posted by DownWithNarita
(Post 3621415)
does anyone know what AxlF16 is complaining about?
|
There is a sale on white new balances! Get off the Dell desktop running Windows 95 and go stock up!
|
Originally Posted by AxlF16
(Post 3620979)
Why do you keep deleting threads where the bigots, racists, xenophobes, and other small minded jagoffs out themselves?
|
Originally Posted by TyWebb
(Post 3621492)
So you're not boycotting Budweiser?
|
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3621497)
If you boycott Budweiser because their beer sucks, does that make you woke, maga, or does it just mean that you’re old enough to have tried good beer and now know better?
|
Originally Posted by DownWithNarita
(Post 3621503)
I don't drink beer, it's too "working class" for me.
|
Originally Posted by AxlF16
(Post 3620982)
Probably not a change of heart...more like a flicker of survival instinct 😄
|
Originally Posted by Spartacusbob
(Post 3621603)
Thanks for continuing to prove the theory that pilots are the dumbest professionals.
|
The union should not be engaged in political topics that divide the pilot group. We need solidarity now. DEI is anti-labor. It is a hindrance to our collective objectives which if eventually obtained will benefit all of us, regardless of identity.
The reason the company embraces DEI as it's fundamentalist religion is not to benefit the employees. |
Originally Posted by AntiPeter
(Post 3621739)
The union should not be engaged in political topics that divide the pilot group. We need solidarity now. DEI is anti-labor. It is a hindrance to our collective objectives which if eventually obtained will benefit all of us, regardless of identity.
The reason the company embraces DEI as its fundamentalist religion is not to benefit the employees. |
Originally Posted by hummingbear
(Post 3621826)
If you’re a member in good standing, go to a meeting & propose a vote of non-diversity outlining the circumstances under which you feel discrimination is appropriate & the groups that should be favored above others. Let me know how it turns out.
DEI began as protecting corporations from costly discrimination lawsuits. It is woefully inadequate for addressing with nuance challenges of discrimination. Discrimination issues are complex, but as you have shown DEI reduces these real and complex issues to manageable problems with ready-made responses. Rather than improving overall QOL and workplace climate, DEI cultivates fragility, as you have also displayed. The more easily we are fragile and offended, the more we need DEI to manage our problems. This is a vicious cycle that does not benefit us, especially as organized labor. Fragile and disorganized pilots can not achieve a good contract. Ultimately DEI is a management strategy, illustrated by the way the policy pits us against each other...as has been displayed here by reactions to the policy. ALPA is doing us a disservice by supporting DEI policies. It is a distraction from our legitimate grievances with the company. DEI undermines ALPAs already fragile and latent leverage. DEI has nothing to do with freedom, acceptance and tolerance. It's a ideology corporations use to protect their interests, at the expense of their employees, customers and especially organized labor. It has nothing to do with equality or assisting historically marginalized peoples. Am I concerned our pilot group and union continue to behave in ways that prohibit a new and adequate CBA? Yep, I sure am. |
Originally Posted by AntiPeter
(Post 3621739)
The union should not be engaged in political topics that divide the pilot group. We need solidarity now. DEI is anti-labor. It is a hindrance to our collective objectives which if eventually obtained will benefit all of us, regardless of identity.
The reason the company embraces DEI as it's fundamentalist religion is not to benefit the employees. |
Originally Posted by hummingbear
(Post 3621826)
If you’re a member in good standing, go to a meeting & propose a vote of non-diversity outlining the circumstances under which you feel discrimination is appropriate & the groups that should be favored above others. Let me know how it turns out.
|
Originally Posted by hummingbear
(Post 3621826)
If you’re a member in good standing, go to a meeting & propose a vote of non-diversity outlining the circumstances under which you feel discrimination is appropriate & the groups that should be favored above others. Let me know how it turns out.
|
Originally Posted by AntiPeter
(Post 3621842)
You are incorrect.
DEI began as protecting corporations from costly discrimination lawsuits. It is woefully inadequate for addressing with nuance challenges of discrimination. Discrimination issues are complex, but as you have shown DEI reduces these real and complex issues to manageable problems with ready-made responses. Rather than improving overall QOL and workplace climate, DEI cultivates fragility, as you have also displayed. The more easily we are fragile and offended, the more we need DEI to manage our problems. This is a vicious cycle that does not benefit us, especially as organized labor. Fragile and disorganized pilots can not achieve a good contract. Ultimately DEI is a management strategy, illustrated by the way the policy pits us against each other...as has been displayed here by reactions to the policy. ALPA is doing us a disservice by supporting DEI policies. It is a distraction from our legitimate grievances with the company. DEI undermines ALPAs already fragile and latent leverage. DEI has nothing to do with freedom, acceptance and tolerance. It's a ideology corporations use to protect their interests, at the expense of their employees, customers and especially organized labor. It has nothing to do with equality or assisting historically marginalized peoples. Am I concerned our pilot group and union continue to behave in ways that prohibit a new and adequate CBA? Yep, I sure am. |
Originally Posted by hummingbear
(Post 3621826)
If you’re a member in good standing, go to a meeting & propose a vote of non-diversity outlining the circumstances under which you feel discrimination is appropriate & the groups that should be favored above others. Let me know how it turns out.
Always remember….”good leads the way”….as long as that person isn’t a cys/heterosexual/male. Those people are ALWAYS bad. Never forget that. |
I’m SHOCKED, SHOCKED I say to find out a labor union and Chicago based company are pushing the liberal ideology of DEI!…or is it DEIB….or DEBI? I’m reminded of the prisoners in the Hanoi Hilton communicating with tap code during indoctrination. Every job sooner or later becomes not worth it.
|
Part of the miscommunication that’s happening here is that we’re talking about two different things.
First was the MEC statement on non-discrimination, which was the subject of the original post. This was extremely benign & generic and- as discrimination is against the law, anyway- tantamount to me making a commitment to not cooking meth in my basement. Exactly no one should care about this; but I do love the irony that I’m a fragile snowflake for not being offended by it. The second topic seems to be the existence of a DEBI committee at ALPA. Again, not the topic originally in question, but fine. Now, we could attempt to have the nuanced adult conversation about the social theories upon which DEI is based, gaps in representation, concerns of overreach, etc., that has as yet eluded these forums; but in the meantime, the pragmatic reality is that a large part of this is just litigation insurance. Everyone here should be wise enough to understand that relying solely on “organic diversity”- an interesting term used to describe an industry that’s historically drawn over 90% of its labor from a single demographic, but I digress- opens any group up to potentially damaging & costly accusations. Some of you guys are so fired up on principle that you’d spend your entire war chest in court rather than having the dreaded DEI label attached to anything you’re associated with. Please grow up, take your own advice, & focus on the actual battle at hand- our contract. |
Originally Posted by ReadOnly7
(Post 3621903)
Always remember….”good leads the way”….as long as that person isn’t a cys/heterosexual/male. Those people are ALWAYS bad. Never forget that. |
Originally Posted by hummingbear
(Post 3621955)
😂 Yes! Clearly cis-hetero-males can’t catch a break & are underrepresented in our labor force as well as union & corporate leadership.
For example……..there’s a poster at one of our domiciles…of a certain individual….”good leading the way”. He’s a disgusting human being with a COMPANY-wide reputation. But….he fits the profile for what the casting department wanted. Tell me how that’s ANY better than casting the beautiful, blond, blue-eyed FA for all the magazine ads in the ‘70s. It’s not BETTER, it’s the SAME. But….discrimination should fix the problem of discrimination….right? |
Originally Posted by ReadOnly7
(Post 3621990)
I don’t really GAF. I have my job, and you can hire EXCLUSIVELY minorities, trans, whatever.
|
I would happily wear a pin that says, “I’m pretty sure I disagree with every opinion you have that doesn’t involve flying. Can I please just read?”
|
Originally Posted by hummingbear
(Post 3621950)
Part of the miscommunication that’s happening here is that we’re talking about two different things.
First was the MEC statement on non-discrimination, which was the subject of the original post. This was extremely benign & generic and- as discrimination is against the law, anyway- tantamount to me making a commitment to not cooking meth in my basement. Exactly no one should care about this; but I do love the irony that I’m a fragile snowflake for not being offended by it. The second topic seems to be the existence of a DEBI committee at ALPA. Again, not the topic originally in question, but fine. Now, we could attempt to have the nuanced adult conversation about the social theories upon which DEI is based, gaps in representation, concerns of overreach, etc., that has as yet eluded these forums; but in the meantime, the pragmatic reality is that a large part of this is just litigation insurance. Everyone here should be wise enough to understand that relying solely on “organic diversity”- an interesting term used to describe an industry that’s historically drawn over 90% of its labor from a single demographic, but I digress- opens any group up to potentially damaging & costly accusations. Some of you guys are so fired up on principle that you’d spend your entire war chest in court rather than having the dreaded DEI label attached to anything you’re associated with. Please grow up, take your own advice, & focus on the actual battle at hand- our contract. Also, since the union is already formed from the very same people who are vetted and hired by the company, a very intersectionally aware company; I wonder how much value a D and I committee has that my union dues are paying for. Frankly, that’s a fair question. One that was probably answered on the first thread since there are mandates for businesses to have such statements and was probably learned by the original op who was unnecessarily castigated by the childish and small behavior of the op of this thread. |
Originally Posted by hummingbear
(Post 3621950)
Part of the miscommunication that’s happening here is that we’re talking about two different things.
First was the MEC statement on non-discrimination, which was the subject of the original post. This was extremely benign & generic and- as discrimination is against the law, anyway- tantamount to me making a commitment to not cooking meth in my basement. Exactly no one should care about this; but I do love the irony that I’m a fragile snowflake for not being offended by it. The second topic seems to be the existence of a DEBI committee at ALPA. Again, not the topic originally in question, but fine. Now, we could attempt to have the nuanced adult conversation about the social theories upon which DEI is based, gaps in representation, concerns of overreach, etc., that has as yet eluded these forums; but in the meantime, the pragmatic reality is that a large part of this is just litigation insurance. Everyone here should be wise enough to understand that relying solely on “organic diversity”- an interesting term used to describe an industry that’s historically drawn over 90% of its labor from a single demographic, but I digress- opens any group up to potentially damaging & costly accusations. Some of you guys are so fired up on principle that you’d spend your entire war chest in court rather than having the dreaded DEI label attached to anything you’re associated with. Please grow up, take your own advice, & focus on the actual battle at hand- our contract.
Originally Posted by hummingbear
(Post 3621996)
For someone who “just doesn’t like BS”, you have an interesting way of overstating what is actually happening to a ridiculous extreme.
Originally Posted by hummingbear
(Post 3608815)
Perhaps if you considered my smug, arrogant persona a way of irritating forum patrons like yourself you’d find it more amusing? Just a suggestion…
|
Originally Posted by hummingbear
(Post 3621996)
For someone who “just doesn’t like BS”, you have an interesting way of overstating what is actually happening to a ridiculous extreme.
|
My gawd can you all just stop? 4 pages going back and forth about stuff that doesn’t affect you, get a hobby.
|
Originally Posted by ReadOnly7
(Post 3622175)
I didn’t say that is what is happening, Captain StrawMan….. I am using hyperbole to explain how much I DON’T care what is done.
Originally Posted by ReadOnly7
(Post 3622175)
”good leads the way”….as long as that person isn’t a cys/heterosexual/male. Those people are ALWAYS bad. I have my job, and you can hire EXCLUSIVELY minorities, trans, whatever. Not all of us who call BS on this stuff are racists, homophobes, or xenophobes. |
Ever notice the people who calls others snowflakes are the biggest snowflakes of them all?
|
Originally Posted by DownWithNarita
(Post 3622440)
Ever notice the people who calls others snowflakes are the biggest snowflakes of them all?
sounds racist to me…. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:36 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands