![]() |
ATP Practical Requirement
I know Delta recently removed their ATP practical requirement for applying. I heard a few rumors about United following suit in the near future but haven’t seen anything official. I was just wondering if anyone had any insight into whether there might be any truth to the rumor.
|
Originally Posted by eric30904
(Post 3649093)
I know Delta recently removed their ATP practical requirement for applying. I heard a few rumors about United following suit in the near future but haven’t seen anything official. I was just wondering if anyone had any insight into whether there might be any truth to the rumor.
|
Originally Posted by eric30904
(Post 3649093)
I know Delta recently removed their ATP practical requirement for applying. I heard a few rumors about United following suit in the near future but haven’t seen anything official. I was just wondering if anyone had any insight into whether there might be any truth to the rumor.
|
Originally Posted by Jaded N Cynical
(Post 3649218)
If true, that scraping noise you'll hear is the bottom of the barrel.
|
Originally Posted by PossibleDeviation
(Post 3649323)
UA has been scraping the bottom of the barrel for a while now.....
|
Originally Posted by Jaded N Cynical
(Post 3649218)
If true, that scraping noise you'll hear is the bottom of the barrel.
Delta doesn’t have that requirement, are they scraping the bottom of the barrel? |
Originally Posted by BlueScholar
(Post 3649456)
Maybe for civilian applicants, but as a military guy all the ATP practical proved was that I had 4K in my bank account. I was flying a multi engine cargo plane in and out of combat zones around the world for years, but I had to prove to the FAA I could fly a little 2 engine piper, and those 4.5 hours was the difference between being a qualified applicant or not?
Delta doesn’t have that requirement, are they scraping the bottom of the barrel? |
Originally Posted by usmc-sgt
(Post 3649494)
Combat zone just meant you had to turn your lights off 😜
|
Originally Posted by BlueScholar
(Post 3649456)
Maybe for civilian applicants, but as a military guy all the ATP practical proved was that I had 4K in my bank account. I was flying a multi engine cargo plane in and out of combat zones around the world for years, but I had to prove to the FAA I could fly a little 2 engine piper, and those 4.5 hours was the difference between being a qualified applicant or not?
Delta doesn’t have that requirement, are they scraping the bottom of the barrel? |
Originally Posted by Jaded N Cynical
(Post 3649218)
If true, that scraping noise you'll hear is the bottom of the barrel.
|
Many, many years ago I got hired with a Single Engine ATP. I never got a Multi-engine ATP until I checked out as a 747-400 F/O some 14 years later.
Joe |
Man, you guys love talking about scraping the bottom of the barrel. Well let me tell you my short story about riding the jumpseat on Southwest.
I was a 747 FO with 5K+ 121 (1800+ 121 PIC, LCA, ERAU, no DUI and in the JS at Southwest and an app on file(for every window the past 5 years). As we pulled into the gate the FO said to the CA, "Hey have you seen who we're hiring? We're really desperate and really scraping the bottom fo the barrel." I didn't say anything, but I regretted not saying anything. It kinda pretty not great. Not saying we are hiring the cream of the crop at United, but be aware of who reads this forum and have some humility. |
Originally Posted by Maingear
(Post 3649830)
Man, you guys love talking about scraping the bottom of the barrel. Well let me tell you my short story about riding the jumpseat on Southwest.
I was a 747 FO with 5K+ 121 (1800+ 121 PIC, LCA, ERAU, no DUI and in the JS at Southwest and an app on file(for every window the past 5 years). As we pulled into the gate the FO said to the CA, "Hey have you seen who we're hiring? We're really desperate and really scraping the bottom fo the barrel." I didn't say anything, but I regretted not saying anything. It kinda pretty not great. Not saying we are hiring the cream of the crop at United, but be aware of who reads this forum and have some humility. |
Originally Posted by Maingear
(Post 3649830)
Man, you guys love talking about scraping the bottom of the barrel. Well let me tell you my short story about riding the jumpseat on Southwest.
I was a 747 FO with 5K+ 121 (1800+ 121 PIC, LCA, ERAU, no DUI and in the JS at Southwest and an app on file(for every window the past 5 years). As we pulled into the gate the FO said to the CA, "Hey have you seen who we're hiring? We're really desperate and really scraping the bottom fo the barrel." I didn't say anything, but I regretted not saying anything. It kinda pretty not great. Not saying we are hiring the cream of the crop at United, but be aware of who reads this forum and have some humility. |
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 3649866)
When you ride on jump seats, and when you read things on the internet the first item on your preflight is “put on your big boy pants”. That’s so you don’t get your little feel feels hurt.
|
Originally Posted by Andy Dufresne
(Post 3649884)
I usually pack a chocolate SnackPack pudding cup to hand to the blue hairs talking about scraping the bottom of the barrel. Or just ask them what it was like back in ‘Nam.
And honestly, I know this is the interwebs where all things are true. But in reality how often do you hear the “blue hairs” talking about bottom scraping and how often do the neophytes need to be comforted while riding the jump seat? |
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 3649917)
As long as you carry a portable safe space it’ll all be alright.
And honestly, I know this is the interwebs where all things are true. But in reality how often do you hear the “blue hairs” talking about bottom scraping and how often do the neophytes need to be comforted while riding the jump seat? |
Originally Posted by Maingear
(Post 3649830)
Man, you guys love talking about scraping the bottom of the barrel. Well let me tell you my short story about riding the jumpseat on Southwest.
I was a 747 FO with 5K+ 121 (1800+ 121 PIC, LCA, ERAU, no DUI and in the JS at Southwest and an app on file(for every window the past 5 years). As we pulled into the gate the FO said to the CA, "Hey have you seen who we're hiring? We're really desperate and really scraping the bottom fo the barrel." I didn't say anything, but I regretted not saying anything. It kinda pretty not great. Not saying we are hiring the cream of the crop at United, but be aware of who reads this forum and have some humility. |
Originally Posted by Justabusdriver1
(Post 3650097)
kind of agree. The difference between someone with 2k hrs and 10k is almost negligible. They’re guys with 10k hrs and honestly terrible pilots in either seat. There are guys with less than 2k who are really sharp. Hrs is a really poor want to judge someone’s ability and chance of success. Hiring lower time pilots is far from scrapping the bottom of the barrel. Half the people on the upper end of any company seniority list are made up of guys who got hired at 250 hrs. So yeah some humility would be nice and remember everyone was new at one point
|
Originally Posted by JTwift
(Post 3649858)
Maybe they didn't hire you because you told everyone you went to Embry Riddle?
ha! I had to read that a few times thinking what certificate of endorsement is a “ERAU”, maybe he’s from Europe or something, then I got it lol Yeah where you learned how to fly a 172 should be kinda pointless at this stage in your career |
Originally Posted by Justabusdriver1
(Post 3650097)
kind of agree. The difference between someone with 2k hrs and 10k is almost negligible. They’re guys with 10k hrs and honestly terrible pilots in either seat. There are guys with less than 2k who are really sharp. Hrs is a really poor want to judge someone’s ability and chance of success. Hiring lower time pilots is far from scrapping the bottom of the barrel. Half the people on the upper end of any company seniority list are made up of guys who got hired at 250 hrs. So yeah some humility would be nice and remember everyone was new at one point
No no no Hours are experience, more experience more better..er Now what I can say is the quality of the hours should be a factor, flying the same hour over and over isn’t worth as much as more dynamic flying, however it seems the airlines would prefer more 121 time sitting in the FLs to more challenging dynamic flying, but it’s their party I guess |
Originally Posted by NevadaJack
(Post 3651079)
No no no
Hours are experience, more experience more better..er Now what I can say is the quality of the hours should be a factor, flying the same hour over and over isn’t worth as much as more dynamic flying, however it seems the airlines would prefer more 121 time sitting in the FLs to more challenging dynamic flying, but it’s their party I guess generally speaking yes I’d agree with you that someone with 10 years of airline experience will have overall a better handle on things. But there’s still new guys out there who are just as sharp or sharper than some of those guys with way more time. |
Originally Posted by Justabusdriver1
(Post 3651485)
hours doesn’t always equal experience though and that’s due to the quality of hours. Idc if it’s 121, 135, 91 turbine or piston. I’ve flown with captains who got scared of landing flaps 3 in a bus, who got worried landing on a downhill runway, who almost diverted immediately when we were put in a hold. These guys had 8 yrs plus 121 time. You would have never known by the lack of decision making and confidence.
generally speaking yes I’d agree with you that someone with 10 years of airline experience will have overall a better handle on things. But there’s still new guys out there who are just as sharp or sharper than some of those guys with way more time. I agree that 121 time should be bottom of the barrel for working pilot time But you get a guy with a good deal of serious 91 or 135 time, with no incidents accidents or enforcement actions, I’d wager he’s much more sharp than any 200hr wonder and probably many 121 guys |
Originally Posted by NevadaJack
(Post 3651543)
I agree that 121 time should be bottom of the barrel for working pilot time
But you get a guy with a good deal of serious 91 or 135 time, with no incidents accidents or enforcement actions, I’d wager he’s much more sharp than any 200hr wonder and probably many 121 guys |
Originally Posted by Justabusdriver1
(Post 3651598)
imo personality and intelligence plays a huge role too. Some people just aren’t decision makers or leaders. You stick someone like that in a position that requires it’s and it doesn’t matter how much time they have. You can only rely on past experiences so much. That’s where I’m coming from when I say there are plenty of guys out there with low time that are more competent than guys out there with thousands of hours.
|
Originally Posted by at6d
(Post 3652163)
Good judgement comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgment.
Total hours is a suspect meter of ability. 14000 hr guy who spends half the time in a bunk of a WB vs 2500 RJ guy or gal doing 4-6 legs a day in the crap weather… 121 landings or legs flown should be a better gauge. |
Originally Posted by WhisperJet
(Post 3652362)
Total hours is a suspect meter of ability. 14000 hr guy who spends half the time in a bunk of a WB vs 2500 RJ guy or gal doing 4-6 legs a day in the crap weather… 121 landings or legs flown should be a better gauge.
|
Originally Posted by JoePatroni
(Post 3652679)
I’m pretty sure that WB guy has a lot more than 2500 hours flying pistons/turboprops without a magenta line or autopilot.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:34 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands