![]() |
Originally Posted by FrancisSawyer
(Post 3670035)
If it’s true SK wants to stick it to AA, look at BOS, PHL, PHX.
|
Originally Posted by buzzer
(Post 3669490)
Source?
Filler |
Originally Posted by Outof410
(Post 3670191)
PHL would be amazing.
|
Originally Posted by ytumama
(Post 3670276)
Mickey. Everybody comes to see Mickey.
|
Originally Posted by KnightNight
(Post 3670293)
I mean we don’t have a lot of overnights there and it’s close to EWR so I don’t think so. I can see phx
|
Originally Posted by FrancisSawyer
(Post 3670502)
EWR is full. PHL is an international airport. Could pick up some international flying to relieve EWR congestion. AA flies out of LGA and JFK and PHL.
|
Originally Posted by hamsandwich
(Post 3670535)
you need feed for international. United doesn’t have near enough flights to feed international ops in phl.
the 321 could be a good way to add frequency in existing markets or to develop new ones, or allow seasonal markets to become year round, besides the planned replacement of the 757 ones. |
BOS is by far the best bet for another, if any. 40 mainline departures scheduled tomorrow, 26 of which are on the Guppy. The rest are a mix of Bus/752 (and one 763 to LHR). CLE has 27 departures tomorrow, 100% Guppy and about 120 crews. LAS has 39 departures, 35 on the Guppy. The LAS base has actually gotten a bit smaller since the first VB it was offered (93 CAs now vs 100ish at open). I think they couldn’t grow LAS more because too many potential CAs would rather make the short commute to SFO/LAX WB than fly the crappy 737 trips they’ve built in LAS so far. And no point growing it further while NH WB FOs have been flocking in to break their seat locks. MCO 737 has grown to 150ish crews since opening. If LAS stabilizes and starts to grow above 100 crews, then I think BOS will likely happen within a couple of years because the percentage of Guppy trips into BOS will rise as the fleet grows. The percentage of Bus flying might grow a tad or remain stable as the 321LR assumes the 752 transcon role in the next few years. Because of LAS and its stunted growth so far, I don’t see PHX anytime soon. Believe it or not ATL, DFW, and SEA have around 30 departures a day across fleets, so further down the road they too might be candidates if the Guppy ‘factor’ grows high enough. God help us all.
|
Originally Posted by CLazarus
(Post 3670822)
BOS is by far the best bet for another, if any. 40 mainline departures scheduled tomorrow, 26 of which are on the Guppy. The rest are a mix of Bus/752 (and one 763 to LHR). CLE has 27 departures tomorrow, 100% Guppy and about 120 crews. LAS has 39 departures, 35 on the Guppy. The LAS base has actually gotten a bit smaller since the first VB it was offered (93 CAs now vs 100ish at open). I think they couldn’t grow LAS more because too many potential CAs would rather make the short commute to SFO/LAX WB than fly the crappy 737 trips they’ve built in LAS so far. And no point growing it further while NH WB FOs have been flocking in to break their seat locks. MCO 737 has grown to 150ish crews since opening. If LAS stabilizes and starts to grow above 100 crews, then I think BOS will likely happen within a couple of years because the percentage of Guppy trips into BOS will rise as the fleet grows. The percentage of Bus flying might grow a tad or remain stable as the 321LR assumes the 752 transcon role in the next few years. Because of LAS and its stunted growth so far, I don’t see PHX anytime soon. Believe it or not ATL, DFW, and SEA have around 30 departures a day across fleets, so further down the road they too might be candidates if the Guppy ‘factor’ grows high enough. God help us all.
|
Originally Posted by webecheck
(Post 3669456)
We don’t connect Pax in sea, and with delta in town there really isn’t a market to add back the previous, and what was a small amount anyway, of intl flying we had.
Thus we should put SGF on the list of potential new bases. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:14 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands