![]() |
Originally Posted by dailyops
(Post 3856972)
It's irrelevant that that they lose theirs every year when we have no sick time payout at retirement. They get 250+ per year and no cap, so unless you plan on calling out for 4 months straight ours is worse. After we vote this in let's see what United wants to cap next
Not sure why you are so negative about this (LOA). It’s not earth shattering with either outcome, and it’s not “United” capping anything. This a proposal from our union to try and speed up the CBP. |
Originally Posted by AF OneWire
(Post 3856981)
Lots of people call out for over 250 straight before they start LTD. Being able to get paid 90 hours a month while you work thru a longer term medical issue seems pretty good to me. I don’t see how Delta’s is any better or worse, just different, I’m not an expert on Delta’s plan though. If there was anything I would like from Delta’s contract it is their green slip construct (especially for reserves).
Not sure why you are so negative about this (LOA). It’s not earth shattering with either outcome, and it’s not “United” capping anything. This a proposal from our union to try and speed up the CBP. |
Originally Posted by AF OneWire
(Post 3856981)
I don’t see how Delta’s is any better or worse, just different, I’m not an expert on Delta’s plan though.
|
Originally Posted by buncee
(Post 3856761)
I thought the people that were saying this LOA is like the Tumi TA were being quite dramatic.
|
Originally Posted by CLazarus
(Post 3856984)
Thread drift, but does anyone else see the humor in labeling this the Tumi LOA? It's funny because the person who coined the term Tumi TA is now the MEC Chair.
This isn't on the MEC Chair. This is on the reps that voted in favor. Hopefully the results of this vote snaps them back to where they their focus needs to be. |
Originally Posted by 89Pistons
(Post 3856985)
The MEC Chair didn't sell this POS LOA to the MEC. The R&I committee and the NC did. And the majority of the members of the MEC voted for it, unfortunately. They were too focused on helping the lawyers out by calling another special meeting the day after the LOA was voted on to file BS Article VIII charges against a rep who's term ends in two months. Many of the reps that voted in favor of Article VIII charges were the ones that voted in favor of this LOA. They were too busy working for lawyers instead of working for the memebership they represent.
This isn't on the MEC Chair. This is on the reps that voted in favor. Hopefully the results of this vote snaps them back to where they their focus needs to be. I don't think any Article VIII charges were voted on or brought in the most recent meeting, nor was a separate special meeting called the day after the LOA. |
Originally Posted by billtaters
(Post 3857004)
I don't think any Article VIII charges were voted on or brought in the most recent meeting, nor was a separate special meeting called the day after the LOA.
|
Originally Posted by billtaters
(Post 3857004)
The MEC Chair is a defacto member of the NC within ALPA. You can't realistically blame a Negotiating Committee for bringing something to an MEC while insulating the MEC Chair.
TLDR: The MEC Chairs do not have as much power as everyone seems to think. |
We should pass out yellow lanyards and get some Delta attorneys for 2025.
|
Originally Posted by calpilot69
(Post 3857031)
We should pass out yellow lanyards and get some Delta attorneys for 2025.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:42 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands