Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   Technology Comparison (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/52825-technology-comparison.html)

SUPERfluf 09-10-2010 08:22 AM

Skynet?

Has it become self-aware yet? :eek:

SoCalGuy 09-10-2010 09:23 AM


Originally Posted by Monkeyfly (Post 867981)
Can anyone tell me the domestic stations that have daytime CAL mechanics?


Originally Posted by EWRflyr (Post 868412)
CUN, MEX

I guess with all the "Reform" in AZ.....CUN & MEX are soon to be considered "Domestic" Ops:eek:

Couldn't resist;)

EWRflyr 09-11-2010 06:05 AM


Originally Posted by UASnake (Post 868551)
We use Weblist in Skynet to check loads and list for flights, both Positive Space (PS) and Non-revenue space available (NRSA). We do not have access to the Departure Management (DM) list, which has been a source of irritation since I've been at UAL. You can get an idea of where you stand using the Apollo res system, but it is cumbersome and time consuming (think typing multiple DOS commands here) if there are a lot of SAs listed. Some of the third party software packages automate this and make it much easier, for a price. Employees traveling PS are not shown in a separate category on Weblist, only the total number of Booked (PS travelers included with customers) and NRSA are displayed.

We can check in online starting 24 hours prior as well, and if you're PS you can view seats and make a change if you see an available seat you'd rather have. We have the smartphone boarding pass option also, I have not used it yet.

When you get to the gate for your flight, the standby list with number of open seats remaining will be displayed on the monitors, if that gate has them. But the list can include revenue standbys as well as NRSA and does not ID who's what, of course the revenues will be ahead of NRSAs on the list. If that gate is not equipped with monitors, you won't know where you stand on the list unless you've gone into Apollo or the CSR is in a good mood and tells you you're #X and there are Y seats available.

EWRflyr, from your description it sounds like your system gives you more info than Skynet gives us. It's already been said here that UAL has a lot of room for improvement in the IT department, but it's worth repeating. The merger presents a great opportunity to upgrade our systems.

Based on what you guys say about your system, maybe they will go with our EmployeeRES system and all the TV screens at the gates. We are starting to add those TVs to the gates already. I think ours is pretty easy to use and detailed. Yes, revenue standby names are not listed but it will show you if there are any and the number. They will obviously have priority over NRSA. Our system also allows pilots and FAs to make jumpseat listings so commuters can get an idea of where they would fall on the list for those seats if the passenger seats fill up.

ual10dude 09-11-2010 06:50 AM


Originally Posted by XHooker (Post 856252)
Nice hearing the straight scoop.

We fly RNAV approaches all the time on the A320/319 fleet.

SoCalGuy 09-11-2010 10:09 AM


Originally Posted by ual10dude (Post 869048)
We fly RNAV approaches all the time on the A320/319 fleet.

RNAV Approaches vs RNAV RNP Approaches.....Not to be confused, two different Approaches per criteria.

RNAV: Direct Point-to-Point Routing via the approach course, Radar Monitoring during the Approach needed.

RNAV/RNP: More "Complex Routes" ie "RF" segments on the Approach, Tighter Performance Req. (More restrictive TERPS), No Radar Requirements, Seamless Vertical Path/Routing....RNP mins vary per Ops Certificate IE CAL .15, or SWA .30

SOTeric 09-11-2010 12:36 PM


Originally Posted by SoCalGuy (Post 869139)
RNAV Approaches vs RNAV RNP Approaches.....Not to be confused, two different Approaches per criteria.

RNAV: Direct Point-to-Point Routing via the approach course, Radar Monitoring during the Approach needed.

RNAV/RNP: More "Complex Routes" ie "RF" segments on the Approach, Tighter Performance Req. (More restrictive TERPS), No Radar Requirements, Seamless Vertical Path/Routing....RNP mins vary per Ops Certificate IE CAL .15, or SWA .30

UA flys em. Crimeny.

Monkeyfly 09-11-2010 01:44 PM

........................

Monkeyfly 09-11-2010 01:59 PM

Judgement Day
 

Originally Posted by SUPERfluf (Post 868555)
Skynet?

Has it become self-aware yet? :eek:


Yes! And it created a genocidal cyborg to destroy all humanity!

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=...w=1270&bih=699

The T2003

ual10dude 09-12-2010 07:49 PM


Originally Posted by SoCalGuy (Post 869139)
RNAV Approaches vs RNAV RNP Approaches.....Not to be confused, two different Approaches per criteria.

RNAV: Direct Point-to-Point Routing via the approach course, Radar Monitoring during the Approach needed.

RNAV/RNP: More "Complex Routes" ie "RF" segments on the Approach, Tighter Performance Req. (More restrictive TERPS), No Radar Requirements, Seamless Vertical Path/Routing....RNP mins vary per Ops Certificate IE CAL .15, or SWA .30

The question was "does UA fly RNAV approaches?"....... Yes. Radar not req. GPS req. The software upgrade to fly RNP approaches (RNP in the approach title) will be installed starting in mid OCT.

Monkeyfly 09-21-2010 07:14 AM

Next question
 
Do CAL pilots have to physically "sign in" in the computer at the start of a trip?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:30 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands