Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   NO JCBA until at least END of October. (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/53680-no-jcba-until-least-end-october.html)

EWRflyr 09-26-2010 05:06 AM


Originally Posted by SoCalGuy (Post 875966)
What many of us are overlooking.....In order for Jeff and the New UAL to execute all the talked about "synergies" that the investors will be wanting to see/promised by way of this merger, they (the company & it's shareholders) WILL need to have a Pilot Group JCBA (and SLI) completed to deliver the numbers touted during the pre-merger talk/propaganda. The ball's in their court to a certain extent....If there are 'large'/lucrative 'synergies' to be had as the talking heads have touched on, then we (the NEW Pilot Group) have skin in the deal to share in it's payout's via the new/lucrative JCBA.

The pieces are in place.....be patient & let the game play out. Not discounting the importance of this JCBA for the NEW Pilot group, but I for one STILL like our present position in the 'game'.

I agree for the most part, but don't forget the whole USAirways debacle. Every merger brings alleged synergies to the table, but US still hasn't realized theirs in full. Remember that VP Fred "I'm Helping Make Your Commute Easier" said in the Flight Ops Propaganda that CAL/UAL didn't have to have this done to realize synergies using US as an example.

I will agree that this is mainly their pilots' fault preventing a full consummation of the marriage over there. The ball was in their court and the pretty much blew that. Hence, doing the JCBA first over here makes our position in the game a better one.

SoCalGuy 09-26-2010 05:50 AM


Originally Posted by EWRflyr (Post 876242)
I agree for the most part, but don't forget the whole USAirways debacle. Every merger brings alleged synergies to the table, but US still hasn't realized theirs in full. Remember that VP Fred "I'm Helping Make Your Commute Easier" said in the Flight Ops Propaganda that CAL/UAL didn't have to have this done to realize synergies using US as an example.

I will agree that this is mainly their pilots' fault preventing a full consummation of the marriage over there. The ball was in their court and the pretty much blew that. Hence, doing the JCBA first over here makes our position in the game a better one.


EWR....

You are absolutely correct on what has become of the USAirways debacle, no arguing there.

On the flip side, why do you think Jay was bombarded for interviews (by the various Financial Analyst/Wall Street Talking Heads/and big time investment firms) during the Court-Ship of this entire merger??? They needed/wanted to know where his Pilot Group stood in this Merger (I'm sure Wendy had the same over at UAL). Wall Street has seen first hand by way of the "Charlie Fox" at USAirways, and enesence, this 5 yr debacle has prevented the company from delivering what they had 'promised' investor first hand from the start.....Financial Benefit of the two airlines coming together. It was just within the last 2 months that even USAirways Mgt has asked for legal help/intervention by the Gov to get this mess figured so that 'they' can reap the 'synergies' that they promised from the start. http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/stories/2010/07/26/daily17.html

When looking at what has happened at USAirways for the last 5+ yrs, I would say that even though approval was given and things are in full swing, the Financial World (and even the Gov) has/will be looking at our Merger with a bit more of a critical eye on delivering what our Mgt has promised it's investors by way of 'huge' economic synergies.

Just one man's take, but your point is understood as well.

A320fumes 09-26-2010 07:06 AM


Originally Posted by Monkeyfly (Post 875956)
I know the info from the Union has been sparse, but let's look at the information first before we get our panties in a bunch.


  1. Do you think the company can respond to our financial proposals if they don't even know each other's financials?

We haven't presented financial proposals yet; CAL/UAL ALPA are at an impasse over the separate B-747 BES/Payrates and the affect such a move would have on SLI.

EWRflyr 09-27-2010 05:40 AM


Originally Posted by SoCalGuy (Post 876254)
EWR....

You are absolutely correct on what has become of the USAirways debacle, no arguing there.

On the flip side, why do you think Jay was bombarded for interviews (by the various Financial Analyst/Wall Street Talking Heads/and big time investment firms) during the Court-Ship of this entire merger??? They needed/wanted to know where his Pilot Group stood in this Merger (I'm sure Wendy had the same over at UAL). Wall Street has seen first hand by way of the "Charlie Fox" at USAirways, and enesence, this 5 yr debacle has prevented the company from delivering what they had 'promised' investor first hand from the start.....Financial Benefit of the two airlines coming together. It was just within the last 2 months that even USAirways Mgt has asked for legal help/intervention by the Gov to get this mess figured so that 'they' can reap the 'synergies' that they promised from the start. http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/stories/2010/07/26/daily17.html

When looking at what has happened at USAirways for the last 5+ yrs, I would say that even though approval was given and things are in full swing, the Financial World (and even the Gov) has/will be looking at our Merger with a bit more of a critical eye on delivering what our Mgt has promised it's investors by way of 'huge' economic synergies.

Just one man's take, but your point is understood as well.

I totally agree with you. As it wasn't too long after the commuter friendly VP came out with that drivel that USAirways went to court saying they can't fully realize the synergies. Found that ironic and perfect timing for us. Thus, I do believe we have better leverage going forward. Wall Street and the financial analysts will be watching closely and putting pressure on as necessary to get this hammered out ASAP.

skypest 09-27-2010 08:31 AM


Originally Posted by A320fumes (Post 876277)
an impasse over the separate B-747 BES/Payrates

What is a B-747 BES ??

SoCalGuy 09-27-2010 09:04 AM


Originally Posted by skypest (Post 876934)
what is a b-747 bes ??

BES......
Base
Equipment
Seat

Fritzthepilot 09-27-2010 06:47 PM


Originally Posted by skypest (Post 876934)
What is a B-747 BES ??

Skypest,

Its amazing what a homeless pilot will do for $20 isn't it?

Fritzthepilot 09-27-2010 06:50 PM


Originally Posted by A320fumes (Post 876277)
We haven't presented financial proposals yet; CAL/UAL ALPA are at an impasse over the separate B-747 BES/Payrates and the affect such a move would have on SLI.

Edumacate us please. Why would the Whale pay rates produce an impasse?

Spicy McHaggis 09-27-2010 08:16 PM


Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot (Post 877334)
Edumacate us please. Why would the Whale pay rates produce an impasse?


During the SLI arbitration, it could be argued that since the whale pays more in that scenario instead of the same as the 777 (which both groups have), the career expectations are higher and Former UAL pilots could get better placement on the combined list.

So the theory goes. As to whether that is a legit argument or fear, who knows?

SUPERfluf 09-28-2010 08:13 AM


Originally Posted by Spicy McHaggis (Post 877395)
During the SLI arbitration, it could be argued that since the whale pays more in that scenario instead of the same as the 777 (which both groups have), the career expectations are higher and Former UAL pilots could get better placement on the combined list.

So the theory goes. As to whether that is a legit argument or fear, who knows?

If the CAL merger committee chairman didn't think it was a big deal then the CAL MEC wouldn't make a big deal out of it.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:20 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands