Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
United delays plans for 787 >

United delays plans for 787

Search
Notices

United delays plans for 787

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-08-2010, 10:44 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
David Watts's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 255
Default United delays plans for 787

I wonder what CALs next system bid will look like.


Published: Monday, December 6, 2010

United delays plans for 787
Uncertainty led to the airline’s decision to postpone a route featuring the plane. On the same day, Boeing said 787 assembly is on hold.
By Mike Benbow, Herald Writer
EVERETT — Uncertainty over delivery of its first 787s prompted United Airlines on Monday to postpone service to New Zealand that will feature the new jet.

The launch of new flights from Houston, Texas, to Auckland, New Zealand, planned to start November 2011, were pushed into 2012 “because of the uncertainty of Boeing’s new delivery date,” said Julie King, spokeswoman for the Chicago-based carrier.

The announcement from United, which became the world’s largest airline Oct. 1 with its merger with Continental, came on a day when the Boeing Co. acknowledged that it was in the middle of a three-week delay of final assembly of the 787 to give its suppliers more time.

“We wanted to give our partners more time to finish what they’re working on currently,” Boeing spokesman Scott Lefeber said.

He said the 16-day production hold in the final body-join area began last month. The 16 days relates to five-day work weeks, so the hold is just over three weeks long.

The delay is not related to the Nov. 9 mid-air fire in a 787 test jet, Lefeber said. The plane landed safely in Laredo, Texas, and there were no injuries. But the 787 flight test program has been put on hold.

The fire and its effect on the potential redesign of 787 hardware and software has raised speculation that delivery of the 787 to its first customers could be delayed by several months to as long as a year. Delivery had been set for early next year.

Lefeber said that a revised production schedule should be available in the next few weeks.

He said that the company still wants suppliers to continue producing 787 parts. But Spirit AeroSystems announced last week that it was temporarily shifting 787 workers to produce 737 parts. Its workers in Wichita, Kan., make the nose section for the 787.

United was slated to take delivery of eight 787s between August of next year and September 2012, according to Ascend Worldwide Ltd., a market research firm specializing in aerospace and space data.

The 787 is set to play a big role in expansion plans at United, which has 50 787-8s on order. United had planned to fly it from Houston to Lagos, Nigeria, next November under the Continental banner, but will instead use 777s, King said.

She would not say if the company will seek any compensation from Boeing for the delays. Continental was the U.S. launch customer for the 787 and was supposed to receive its first Dreamliner in March 2009.

Delivery of the 787 is now three years late.

Boeing has assembled 26 787s so far, many that still need some additional work because of supplier issues or other problems. It will have to retest and replace every component that it redesigns because of the electrical fire.

Boeing shares closed at $66.59 a share Monday, up five cents. The company’s stock price has climbed about 25 percent during the past year.
David Watts is offline  
Old 12-09-2010, 05:23 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,882
Default

Well, the effective date of the last bid isn't until Spring of 2012. The company can just delay sending pilots to training off that bid if they wanted. It even said that the company has the option to send the pilots back to their original aircraft depending on the 787 delivery schedule. I don't think this will change anything that much unless EIS for the 787 is much past Spring of 2012 at UniCAL. JMHO though.
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 12-09-2010, 06:01 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by EWRflyr View Post
Well, the effective date of the last bid isn't until Spring of 2012. The company can just delay sending pilots to training off that bid if they wanted. It even said that the company has the option to send the pilots back to their original aircraft depending on the 787 delivery schedule. I don't think this will change anything that much unless EIS for the 787 is much past Spring of 2012 at UniCAL. JMHO though.
Could also read:
"Spring 2008"
"Spring 2009"
"Spring 2010"
"Spring 2011"

Not bagging you man, but posting some FU to Boeing and to CAL for not putting BA's feet to the fire. But like Larry said "it's going to be a game changer!"
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Old 12-09-2010, 07:06 AM
  #4  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by EWRflyr View Post
Well, the effective date of the last bid isn't until Spring of 2012. The company can just delay sending pilots to training off that bid if they wanted. It even said that the company has the option to send the pilots back to their original aircraft depending on the 787 delivery schedule. I don't think this will change anything that much unless EIS for the 787 is much past Spring of 2012 at UniCAL. JMHO though.
The above is a BIG assumption. Spring of 2012 is approx 18 months away. That can be construed as an 'eternity' with the current Merger.

What happens if we get a JCBA, and the SLI via the arbitrator is done during that time (I know, send me to HR immediately for the 'test' right now)?? They will be doing a lot more than just delaying pilots, they would most likely have to put down a new system bid with the SLI considerations with the possiblity of the above happening.

18 months (and that's just a Boeing wag of continued delays) is a LONG TIME with a lot of landscape changing daily as we speak while the Merger is in full swing.

LOTS of "IF's" brother.....and as I have said before, "IF a frog has wings, he would be dragging around is a$$ either".
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 12-09-2010, 02:26 PM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 31
Default mec blast mail

Dec. 09, 2010
ALERT: IMPENDING SYSTEM BID
The MEC System Staffing Committee (SSC) has been meeting with our Company counterparts since the B-737 staffing issues of December became known. The delays in delivery of the B-787 following an inflight problem are also being discussed. Both of these issues require changes to correct staffing imbalances that have significant impact on the Continental pilots’ quality of life.

The Company has indicated that they will be issuing a 12-04 System Bid within the next few business days (week of Dec. 13 at latest). The following outlines our understanding of the bid following the latest meeting on Dec. 8:

1. All returning furloughees will return on the current schedule (no change).

2. The B-787 BES will be reduced to a level commensurate with anticipated delivery dates (no earlier than spring 2012). The Company will need to communicate changes in expected training dates.

3. There will be no net reduction in total captain positions.

4. B-737 CA/FO positions will be bolstered to handle the additional flying added since December 2010.

5. EWR B-737 CA/FO positions will be increased to provide NYC overnight imbalance relief in IAH pairings.

6. Any displacements will be handled per our current working agreement.

The MAR-TAB (training assignment bid) will not be issued until this new bid is awarded. Once the bid is published, the MEC SSC will communicate any further items or issues of importance through the MEC News weekly blastmail.
merger is offline  
Old 12-09-2010, 02:32 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
luv757's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: 18%er but I’ll enforce UPA23 to the last period.
Posts: 434
Default

So the much rumored LAX 737 base is still just that, a rumor.
luv757 is offline  
Old 12-10-2010, 05:31 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,882
Default

Originally Posted by merger
5. EWR B-737 CA/FO positions will be increased to provide NYC overnight imbalance relief in IAH pairings.
Translation: We really screwed up trying to "help" the commuters a few bids ago by moving pilots to IAH from EWR.
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 12-10-2010, 07:08 AM
  #8  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by EWRflyr View Post
Translation: We really screwed up trying to "help" the commuters a few bids ago by moving pilots to IAH from EWR.
Just to be clear.....
The "individual" in Mgt who came forward to utter that psycho babble BS to the CAL pilot group is NOW assuming the position of VP of Flt Ops for the "New" UAL. For those who don't know him yet, you will soon!!

Enjoy!!
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 12-10-2010, 03:48 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: IAH 737 CA
Posts: 690
Default

Originally Posted by SoCalGuy View Post
Just to be clear.....
The "individual" in Mgt who came forward to utter that psycho babble BS to the CAL pilot group is NOW assuming the position of VP of Flt Ops for the "New" UAL. For those who don't know him yet, you will soon!!

Enjoy!!
Stop sugar coating it. Fred did this simply to be vindictive and now that CAL has wasted 5-7 m this year in unecesary hotels, I'm suprised that he's still empliyeed. Debbie did sonething similar to this with furloughs and "left" soon after.
EWR73FO is offline  
Old 12-10-2010, 05:57 PM
  #10  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by EWR73FO View Post
Stop sugar coating it. Fred did this simply to be vindictive and now that CAL has wasted 5-7 m this year in unecesary hotels, I'm suprised that he's still empliyeed. Debbie did sonething similar to this with furloughs and "left" soon after.
Really??? May want to re-check you rational.

To refresh your memory par......If some clown down on Smith Street was "allowed" to completely 'screw the K9' on the ALL TIME WORST fuel hedge by CAL that took place 24+ months ago, do YOU really think a few measly cents on extra hotel rooms is going to send shock waves through the ranks?? Seriously doubt it brother....."Friends of Fred" continue, truely pathetic.

BTW....I don't see an once of sugar coating in what I wrote above.
SoCalGuy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 03:16 PM
T Dawg
United
9
09-19-2010 08:25 AM
Jettubby
Mergers and Acquisitions
9
05-15-2008 05:23 PM
newKnow
Mergers and Acquisitions
4
04-28-2008 07:08 PM
Sir James
Major
0
05-06-2005 09:10 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices