Freeing up money to bring back 104 pilots?
 

The company must be aware they are going to need pilots (and pay us more) so I guess they are doing all they can to save money elsewhere in the operation. Of course my calculations assume $100,000/yr income just like they assumed $100/bbl oil. I think it is a good first step.

United calls on Boeing to enhance B777 fuel efficiency
United and Boeing announced Tuesday that we will modify our fleet of 52 UA Boeing 777-200s with a Performance Improvement Package (PIP) from Boeing that will result in greater fuel efficiency and reduced emissions.
The 777 PIP improves the airplane’s aerodynamics through a software change to enable three fuel-saving components: a drooped aileron, a ram air system improvement and the installation of improved wing vortex generators. We estimate the PIP will reduce fuel spending per airplane by about $200,000 annually (assuming $100 per barrel crude oil prices).
“We appreciate Boeing’s continued efforts to make existing aircraft more fuel-efficient,” said Fleet VP Ron Baur. “We are very focused on improving fuel efficiency in our fleet as a natural hedge against rising fuel prices.”
Our fleet of CO Boeing 777-200s was among the first retro-fitted with the package in 2007.

EWRflyr-

I like your way of thinking! :)

Now what would really impress me is if they exercise our 40 A319/320 options still on the books as NEO and upgrade the existing fleet. 16% efficiency gain plus an extra 4,400 payload capacity. The question was raised during the JPM conference yesterday so it is not that far fetch. Supposedly would put the bus on par with a C-series as far as efficiency. Of course we might need to cancel some RJ flying at the same time.....;)

KC

I guess I can get sarcastic at times, but any opportunity that the company shows to save money while they are MAKING money looks to me like an opportunity for the pilots to MAKE money while the company is saving money.:D