Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
"UAL doesn't want the competition" of SWA >

"UAL doesn't want the competition" of SWA

Notices

"UAL doesn't want the competition" of SWA

Old 05-24-2012, 04:48 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default "UAL doesn't want the competition" of SWA

USA Today (May 24, 2012) Domestic giant Southwest sticks nose into international air

The airline is picking up AirTran's flights to Mexico and the Caribbean after buying its rival last year. It's getting a new reservations system to handle overseas bookings and is seeking to build an international terminal at Houston's Hobby Airport, where it says it could ultimately add 25 flights abroad a day.

The airline also is seeking approval from Houston's city council to build a five-gate international terminal at Hobby Airport, whose private flights are the only ones that go to foreign destinations. The city's mayor, Annise Parker, announced her support for the terminal on Wednesday. Federal aviation officials will also have to give their OK.

Southwest would like to open the terminal, which would cost $100 million to $125 million, by 2015. It envisions it as the launching point for flights into Central and South America in addition to Mexico and the Caribbean.

A report commissioned by the Houston Airport System determined that the new portal would bring in an extra 1.5 million passengers annually, lead to 10,000 jobs for the Houston area, and amount to an economic benefit of $1.6 billion a year.

"The report projects that opening Hobby to international service would create a more competitive landscape" and lower fares, Houston Airport System's aviation director Mario Diaz wrote in a memo to Mayor Parker that supports the new terminal .

Plans were for the council to take up the matter by the end of May, said mayoral spokeswoman Janice Evans.

United, the biggest of the network carriers and which counts Houston's larger Bush Intercontinental Airport as its biggest hub, is not on board with Southwest's plan to turn Hobby into its international launch pad.

United flies the majority of passengers headed to foreign destinations from Houston. And it says its own study found that the proposed terminal at Hobby would result in the area taking an economic hit.

"Dividing the air service between the two airports … will mean that Houston is competing with itself for international connecting traffic rather than competing with very successful cities that have one international airport, like Atlanta and Dallas," says United spokeswoman Mary Clark. "We believe it will result in a loss of jobs and also there will be an economic loss for the city of Houston."

Clark says there is room for Southwest at Bush Intercontinental.

Southwest's Jordan counters that United is concerned about itself rather than the community.

"United Airlines doesn't want the competition," he says. "We're asking to bring more flights, and lower fares for the people of Houston, and bring in the economic benefits that come from that."

Full article: http://travel.usatoday.com/flights/s...air/55174412/1
APC225 is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 05:11 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

"The report projects that opening Hobby to international service would create a more competitive landscape" and lower fares, Houston Airport System's aviation director Mario Diaz wrote in a memo to Mayor Parker that supports the new terminal."

-- Isn't that what UAL is all about? A competitive balance? "Our [CBA] proposal will include significant pay rate increases that are competitive with the new Delta TA, as well as scope and work rules that are competitive with the new Delta TA and permit us to remain competitive in the airline business." -- Jeff Smisek

"says United spokeswoman Mary Clark. "We believe it will result in a loss of jobs and also there will be an economic loss for the city of Houston." "

-- Glad UAL is concerned about job losses. Perhaps they could show the same concern for 1500 furloughed "co-workers" in their own company and many more if we get DAL scope.

"Southwest's Jordan counters that United is concerned about itself rather than the community."

-- Say it ain't so! After UAL execs gave themselves a 300% pay raise while the CEO states over and over "we're not going to let one employee group benefit at the expense of another," who woulda thought?

"United Airlines doesn't want the competition," he says.

-- They're not used to it. With CAL's contract and history they haven't had to compete on a level playing field for 3 decades.

Last edited by APC225; 05-24-2012 at 05:36 AM.
APC225 is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 07:13 AM
  #3  
Recommend Retention
 
LifeNtheFstLne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Bigfoot
Posts: 1,077
Default

"Dear Continental, this is what you get for moving to Chicago." Signed, citizens and elected officials of Houston

Nice work Jeffy.
LifeNtheFstLne is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 07:21 AM
  #4  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Funny....
Jeffery & the Gang have even resorted to posting the KeepingIAHStrong web address on the gate/arrival signs for all pilots to stare as they roll up to the gates in IAH.

They're barking up the wrong tree.
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 07:30 AM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 55
Default

I never understood why UCH didn't let Houston and Chicago bid against each other to get the head quarters. Was there already a back room deal with Mayor Emmanuel, ie. don't let Obama release any work groups to self help, and we'll stay in your city?
I understand Boeing got huge tax advantages when they chose Chicago over the other two municipalities that were bidding to be the hometown of the corporation.
I think UCH should float the idea of a new consolidated training "head quarters" in IAH. I never understand why they don't use their labor negotiating tactics on other departments and municipalities. This would be the city of Houston version of "new aircraft orders". Let Denver and Houston bid against each other for the combined companies training facility.
UAL4LOW Stink is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 10:43 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,169
Default

Because trying to hold back SWA in Houston has worked so well in the past for CAL.
Grumble is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 11:09 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cadetdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Default

Who cares what SWA is doing??

Co-worker Jeff has repeatedly told the UCH pilot groups that SWA pay rates are unreasonable and particularly so because SWA is not a competitor or in our peer group. Since SWA is not a competitor to UCH it's a non-issue---let them do whatever they want over at HOU.

Not my problem.
cadetdrivr is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 08:34 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 234
Default

Good. SWA can have Mexico and everything else that goes with it. Not my problem. Jeffy Jeff is going to spin this against the pilot group somehow.
bearcat is offline  
Old 05-24-2012, 10:46 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Beaver Hunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 294
Default

I wouldn't believe any rosie forecast by any gov a%^ pie. All lies and BS. Look at CA and there high speed rail rider predictions. FUBAR
In a true free market. Mgmt can be pricks and we can cut it off if it gets to big. No pun intended.
Beaver Hunter is offline  
Old 05-25-2012, 07:51 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
socalflyboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Cal reserve..the gift that keeps on giving
Posts: 532
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr View Post
Who cares what SWA is doing??

Co-worker Jeff has repeatedly told the UCH pilot groups that SWA pay rates are unreasonable and particularly so because SWA is not a competitor or in our peer group. Since SWA is not a competitor to UCH it's a non-issue---let them do whatever they want over at HOU.

Not my problem.
OR, how about this..since we do now directly compete with swa, we are demanding swa payrates, work rules, duty rigs, days off..etc..we are competing now Jack!!
socalflyboy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sr. Barco
Southwest
270
11-05-2011 10:53 AM
Sr. Barco
Southwest
44
10-12-2011 07:39 PM
brakechatter
Major
601
10-12-2010 11:54 AM
Metal121
Major
20
02-04-2008 08:31 PM
SWAjet
Major
44
01-19-2006 12:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices