Iah 787
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 153
TPA is clear what domiciles could be opened and what current equipment. The TPA states no new equipment can be placed in those domiciles. The TPA gave exception to EWR and the 787.
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
If the CAL pilots think this is a fast one do that UAL pilots can fly the 787 think again. This is a way to force a management (CAL) who was used to doing just about anything they want in spite of their contractual obligations and limitations.
Don't forget if it was the other way around management would insist upon pilots following their agreed upon obligations.
Of course when management finally agrees to the contract language and the isl do ya think some of these things will be settled?
Don't forget if it was the other way around management would insist upon pilots following their agreed upon obligations.
Of course when management finally agrees to the contract language and the isl do ya think some of these things will be settled?
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Wish it will work, but it won't. So one line in the TPA that was amended last winter is the argument? Company lawyers will cut this one to pieces in one hearing. I guarantee you there is more then enough legalize in countless documents that torpedo this grievance. One thing Unical isn't dumb about is using lawyers to stick it to employees.
#15
So how come so many of the employees are so eager and lined up to go the extra mile? Just how sore does ones dump valve need to be?
James is thoroughly perplexed and completely disillusioned. What the golly, over?
James is thoroughly perplexed and completely disillusioned. What the golly, over?
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Intrepid:
"Company lawyers will cut this one to pieces in one hearing. I guarantee you there is more then enough legalize in countless documents that torpedo this grievance."
I guess I don't get your statement at all. Who cares anything about the quality of the Company Lawyers or even the chance of winning the grievance? This is about loading your gun with the ammo you have left and making a point. It's statements like yours and the associated attitudes why the CAL Management has done basically anything they want over the years.
If the contract/TPA says no 787 in IAH then stick to it, simple.
"Company lawyers will cut this one to pieces in one hearing. I guarantee you there is more then enough legalize in countless documents that torpedo this grievance."
I guess I don't get your statement at all. Who cares anything about the quality of the Company Lawyers or even the chance of winning the grievance? This is about loading your gun with the ammo you have left and making a point. It's statements like yours and the associated attitudes why the CAL Management has done basically anything they want over the years.
If the contract/TPA says no 787 in IAH then stick to it, simple.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Sled
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post