Notices

TA Overview

Old 11-14-2012, 06:04 PM
  #161  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 40
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy View Post
I'm curious about this as well (I think you are referencing the Aer Lingus tie-up/scope experiment). Has anyone said anything about scope at the bottom end; you know, those pesky RJs?

Disclaimer: I am just a lowly RJ driver and I know this is not my place. But there are a lot of us on this side who are counting on the big boys to hold the line so we have a shot at moving on in this life time.

I read somewhere in the explaination section that scope specifically addresses this. Aer Lingus was actually the eg.
Jimmykool is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 06:52 PM
  #162  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rocketiii's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 111
Default

Originally Posted by jsled View Post
12:45 between rest periods? That doesn't even make sense. I already answered your post. Yes, a guy sitting at home on short call can be called and given a trip that shows in 10 hrs. How does that dispute the 12:45 rest after blocking in from a flying assignment? You need to educate yourself on this contract, Motch. There is lots of material on the website. Try the CrewsNews. I have read them all. And the Contract Comparison clearly shows yearly rate comparisons, so I am not sure what you are talking about.

Sled
So when the reserve comes in at the end of his 4 day at 9am, he can take the midnight redeye out. Or come on call at 3am, they don't need you then give you a evening departure. Same crap they do now. Assume all provisions will be whittled down due to no staffing-ever. Constant short call. 90 reserve hours before bypass? Cal loses 3 hours of guarantee with same days off unless we "earn" some back? No seniority based call out times and no ability to pass. Just FIFO. Remember, anything that looks remotely beneficial will be manipulated and abused in ways you haven't seen yet because of improper staffing. At least they have 9 months to implement reserve areas if I recall- get them through another summer.
Rocketiii is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 07:43 PM
  #163  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by SoCentralRain View Post
Bogging down for another 9-12 months? ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

I hope your steel backbone and courage in this regard are carried with you to the cockpit. Bravo.

It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.

SCR
SCR, Just had some beers with a UAL council rep. Smart fellow. He explained the impossible position The CAL reps put them in....Delay the TA or compromise with Longevity and move on. The latter would give furloughees a 30% + raise (< $10 dollars or so short per hour than if you got full longevity) or hold up the TA because of CAL ALPA's SLI strategy. The choice was hard but clear.

Sled
jsled is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 08:02 PM
  #164  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by Rocketiii View Post
Remember, anything that looks remotely beneficial will be manipulated and abused in ways you haven't seen yet because of improper staffing.
And to save money. For example, are you happy the first class DH survived? Look again. It still says "at time of booking." UAL pilots assume that this booking will still take place, as it does now, when the monthly schedules come when there are still open first class seats. CAL pilots know, since it doesn't say when the booking has to take place, the company will just change the time of booking to 24 hours before the flight, when there are no first class seats left. "Time of booking" not specified in the contract, problem solved. No more pilots in first class.

UAL pilots have no idea how this management views a contract. And as this is a completely new one every line is ungrieved virgin territory. They will interpret it in ways you could not imagine and just rope-a-dope us in the RLA grievance process just as they have the negotiations until we just give up from fatigue--just like many feel now.

The only hope is to vote this down, in a big way, to get full retro up front, immediate industry leading pay rates, makes some gains on scope, and tighten up the language. It's the only solace we're gonna have for six plus four years.

Last edited by APC225; 11-14-2012 at 08:23 PM.
APC225 is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 08:30 PM
  #165  
On Reserve
 
rogual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A-320 CAP
Posts: 18
Default

True it is a signing bonus but is being distributed proportionally as if it were a retro only smaller. Seems a fair way to go, even though it's short.
rogual is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 09:49 PM
  #166  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: B756 FO
Posts: 1,288
Default

Originally Posted by APC225 View Post
And to save money. For example, are you happy the first class DH survived? Look again. It still says "at time of booking." UAL pilots assume that this booking will still take place, as it does now, when the monthly schedules come when there are still open first class seats. CAL pilots know, since it doesn't say when the booking has to take place, the company will just change the time of booking to 24 hours before the flight, when there are no first class seats left. "Time of booking" not specified in the contract, problem solved. No more pilots in first class.

UAL pilots have no idea how this management views a contract. And as this is a completely new one every line is ungrieved virgin territory. They will interpret it in ways you could not imagine and just rope-a-dope us in the RLA grievance process just as they have the negotiations until we just give up from fatigue--just like many feel now.

The only hope is to vote this down, in a big way, to get full retro up front, immediate industry leading pay rates, makes some gains on scope, and tighten up the language. It's the only solace we're gonna have for six plus four years.
That example you gave of interpreting the F class DH situation just made me sick to think that the regional management mentality really exists in the legacy level... On behalf of all of us outside looking in, do everyone and favor and get what you deserve in unbreakable language.
SUX4U is offline  
Old 11-15-2012, 12:34 AM
  #167  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LCAL dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 138
Default

Originally Posted by rogual View Post
True it is a signing bonus but is being distributed proportionally as if it were a retro only smaller. Seems a fair way to go, even though it's short.

Can I borrow $100,000 from you? I promise to pay you $8,000 back 4 years from now and call it even.




Still sound fair?
LCAL dude is offline  
Old 11-15-2012, 01:45 AM
  #168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by CAL 73 View Post
If it gets voted down 55% to 45%, they will tweak rates and retro to get the 5.01% needed to pass it. That will not take long.

I know we are all hungry and psychologically drained waiting for our contract, but we can not settle on the crumbs they throw off the table. We can't settle on a deal that is not worthy of a contract. Have faith, management needs a deal now more than we do and they will give more if we stand strong. Vote NO
Not exactly. The company will be saving app. 1.3M per day without this contract and will be in no hurry. They will want to change this and that, the NMB will want ALPA to do a Wilson Poll to determine why the contract failed... In the end, you'll end up with the same dollar cost to the company just rearranged to make it look better. At least go to a road show before you vote. This has all been done before, over and over. The results for labor are not pretty.

Sled
jsled is offline  
Old 11-15-2012, 01:52 AM
  #169  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by horrido27 View Post
Currently getting $108.22.. 6th yr 756 FO.
Reserve, 76 hours.

1 Jan 13 if TA becomes JCBA- $117.67.

um, how is that 40-63%?
Raise of $9.45

Motch

Airbus Captain current rate 137/hr
DOS........188/hr (37%)
Jan 2017.......224/hr (63%)

Sled
jsled is offline  
Old 11-15-2012, 02:16 AM
  #170  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by APC225 View Post
And to save money. For example, are you happy the first class DH survived? Look again. It still says "at time of booking." UAL pilots assume that this booking will still take place, as it does now, when the monthly schedules come when there are still open first class seats. CAL pilots know, since it doesn't say when the booking has to take place, the company will just change the time of booking to 24 hours before the flight, when there are no first class seats left. "Time of booking" not specified in the contract, problem solved. No more pilots in first class.

UAL pilots have no idea how this management views a contract. And as this is a completely new one every line is ungrieved virgin territory. They will interpret it in ways you could not imagine and just rope-a-dope us in the RLA grievance process just as they have the negotiations until we just give up from fatigue--just like many feel now.

The only hope is to vote this down, in a big way, to get full retro up front, immediate industry leading pay rates, makes some gains on scope, and tighten up the language. It's the only solace we're gonna have for six plus four years.
Our management played the same games. Maybe not to the same extent, but First Class DH on domestic flights was almost non existant after our 2003 contract. The new language is better.

From the TA:

5-C-2 Global Flight Deadheading
When On-Line deadheading on a Global Flight, a Pilot shall be booked positive space. Pilots shall be booked in Business Class, if available at the time of booking. If Business Class is unavailable, the booking shall be in First Class, if available at the time of booking. If both
Business Class and First Class are unavailable, Business Class shall be overbooked to accommodate the Pilot, unless Business Class does not exist on the aircraft, in which case First Class shall be overbooked to accommodate the Pilot. When a Pilot is booked in Business Class, he may be upgraded to First Class at the gate on the day of Departure, but only after all revenue passenger upgrades have been accommodated (e.g., MileagePlus upgrades). When a
Pilot is overbooked in Business Class or First Class, he shall be boarded in Business Class or First Class and may not be downgraded to Economy Class (including Economy Plus). In no case shall a Pilot whose deadheading is booked under this Section 5-C-2 be required to deadhead in Economy Class (including Economy Plus).


5-C-1-d When deadheading to or from any assignment, if the deadhead leg is greater than eight (8) hours or the total amount of deadheading in the Duty Period is greater than eight
(8) hours, the Pilot shall be booked in accordance with the provisions of Section 5-C-2. (above)

5-C-1-h A deadheading Pilot booked in First or Business Class shall not be downgraded to Economy Class to accommodate an upgraded passenger.

5-C-1-e A Pilot whose deadhead is booked under this Section 5-C-1 shall not be required to deadhead in Economy Class if the seat is not an Economy Plus seat except that:
5-C-1-e-(1) If the aircraft is not configured with Economy Plus seating, then premium Economy Class seating that has extra legroom shall satisfy a requirement to be seated in Economy Plus.
5-C-1-e-(2) If the aircraft is not configured with Economy Plus seating, premium Economy Class seating, Business Class or First Class, the Pilot may be seated in Economy Class even if the seat is not Economy Plus.
jsled is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pksocal
United
25
05-23-2012 02:29 PM
ctd57
Major
4
04-02-2012 05:38 PM
ToiletDuck
Regional
10
01-11-2008 11:38 AM
Freight Dog
Regional
3
08-27-2006 11:53 PM
HSLD
Flight Schools and Training
2
05-14-2006 09:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices