A REAL Unionist view of LOA-25 Furlough rape!
11-15-2012, 05:17 PM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
Thanks for the support!
Originally Posted by CleCapt
As a Cal pilot I agree that the TA is not treating furloughs equally, and that is wrong. I don't know where the deal came from or the timeline. All pilots on furlough should be treated equally. The TA should provide full longevity for pay and benefits.
The arbitrator will decide the means of integrating the lists. I don't believe that the wording of a TA with respect to longevity and pay with have any affect on an arbitrators decision.
Vote down this TA, go back ONE time with a compete list of fixes and get a new TA before the end of the year.
This could all have been avoided if there was not a gag order and pilots could have given input to the NC as we went along.
The arbitrator will decide the means of integrating the lists. I don't believe that the wording of a TA with respect to longevity and pay with have any affect on an arbitrators decision.
Vote down this TA, go back ONE time with a compete list of fixes and get a new TA before the end of the year.
This could all have been avoided if there was not a gag order and pilots could have given input to the NC as we went along.
11-15-2012, 05:18 PM
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: B777
Posts: 586
Originally Posted by CleCapt
As a Cal pilot I agree that the TA is not treating furloughs equally, and that is wrong. I don't know where the deal came from or the timeline. All pilots on furlough should be treated equally. The TA should provide full longevity for pay and benefits.
The arbitrator will decide the means of integrating the lists. I don't believe that the wording of a TA with respect to longevity and pay with have any affect on an arbitrators decision.
Vote down this TA, go back ONE time with a compete list of fixes and get a new TA before the end of the year.
This could all have been avoided if there was not a gag order and pilots could have given input to the NC as we went along.
The arbitrator will decide the means of integrating the lists. I don't believe that the wording of a TA with respect to longevity and pay with have any affect on an arbitrators decision.
Vote down this TA, go back ONE time with a compete list of fixes and get a new TA before the end of the year.
This could all have been avoided if there was not a gag order and pilots could have given input to the NC as we went along.
Great post and thank you sir for you thoughts and input.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
