![]() |
Originally Posted by ewrbasedpilot
(Post 1395215)
Just wondering if you were a 2005 hire at CAL and holding a CA slot, would you be advocating what you do now? I hardly doubt it....... Hard to understand how a pilot that was on property for only a year
should go senior to someone who's never been furloughed and been on property for eight years. Where is the fairness in that? Let me ask you a few questions >> A Jan 2008 hire at CAL has at MOST 5 yrs and 2 months longevity (assuming they weren't furloughed...which I believe they were). I (Jan 1997 hire) have 16 years and 2 months longevity (I was never furloughed). Your proposed list has me in the middle of that group...where is the fairness in that?? You guys might want to think about the concept of longevity. |
Originally Posted by ewrbasedpilot
(Post 1395215)
Just wondering if you were a 2005 hire at CAL and holding a CA slot, would you be advocating what you do now? I hardly doubt it....... Hard to understand how a pilot that was on property for only a year
should go senior to someone who's never been furloughed and been on property for eight years. Where is the fairness in that? Just wondering how YOU'D feel under the same circumstances, if you were a 96 UAL hire. |
Originally Posted by Sunvox
(Post 1394869)
I am sorry if my approach to analyzing previous awards is upsetting to you...
Again sorry if the historical facts upset you. In the meantime, thanks for the link. |
Originally Posted by 13n144e
(Post 1395420)
I'll look forward to having that discussion in September...
In the meantime, thanks for the link. No prob, and I agree can't wait for September. :D |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:23 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands