TA Grievance Award
#2
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 536
It's time for that guy to go away - Hold him accountable.
#3
From what I understand, once the grievance has been decided, in this case in favor of L-UAL, then it is fairly standard to send it back to resolve the grievance. Nothing sinister, and I don't think Pierce would have much to say about it. This grievance is between L-UAL ALPA and the company.
#4
On Reserve
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 18
From what I understand, once the grievance has been decided, in this case in favor of L-UAL, then it is fairly standard to send it back to resolve the grievance. Nothing sinister, and I don't think Pierce would have much to say about it. This grievance is between L-UAL ALPA and the company.
Sooner or later you'll get your pennies on the dollar. I assume that the way things go around the campus it will be later.
#5
SLI best wishes!
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: B767 Capt
Posts: 399
-1.3.5 duty rigs (sooner)
-LOA 25 (GONE)
-NO FSB unless IROPS
-4hr RSV call out (again)
-min line guarantee 73
-Fix the crew rest situation
#6
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 536
The company settled a $200K dollar grievance for $40M, that is more than pennies on the dollars. I think a "settlement" precedent has been set. This leverage if used wisely could generate some contract improvement that will benefit "ALL". See how is that selfish?
-1.3.5 duty rigs (sooner)
-LOA 25 (GONE)
-NO FSB unless IROPS
-4hr RSV call out (again)
-min line guarantee 73
-Fix the crew rest situation
-1.3.5 duty rigs (sooner)
-LOA 25 (GONE)
-NO FSB unless IROPS
-4hr RSV call out (again)
-min line guarantee 73
-Fix the crew rest situation
#7
SLI best wishes!
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: B767 Capt
Posts: 399
Let ME make it more simple: The above improvements are WORTH more long term than the miserly ONE TIME amount of approx. $5200 per pilot. Capiche!
#8
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 536
I did not expect the ME! ME! ME! ME! crowd to see the obvious in the above example. Staller, you are sounding just like the guy you dislike the most, JP himself. Ironic is it not?
Let ME make it more simple: The above improvements are WORTH more long term than the miserly ONE TIME amount of approx. $5200 per pilot. Capiche!
Let ME make it more simple: The above improvements are WORTH more long term than the miserly ONE TIME amount of approx. $5200 per pilot. Capiche!
The highlighted section may be true but are you really that big a boy Scout?
#9
SLI best wishes!
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: B767 Capt
Posts: 399
Turn it into a ME thing????? The reason we ended up with the contract we did was because of the actions of the cal pilots. We are still separate pilot groups and any attempt to use this ruling as a means to improve contract over awarding damages to the pilot group will end in lawsuits. Want to guess who'll win?
The highlighted section may be true but are you really that big a boy Scout?
The highlighted section may be true but are you really that big a boy Scout?
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 281
Played just like a broken record ... its ALWAYS the CAL guys fault ... MAN-UP and take responsibility for your own actions or in-actions ... nobody on this board knows who voted how, on the macro level ... many believe that the UAL guys drove the yes voted, many out of fear ... you brought a weak contract w/respect to scope protections (i.e. no flying hour ratio protections), and had to play that hand when faced with the perceived threat of losing that if the TP&A had expired ... that is how it went down ... now back to the regularly scheduled L-CAL bashing.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post