|
Originally Posted by horrido27
(Post 1470211)
I also want to add that last year I attempted to attend a LUAL Local Council meeting. This was after the Profit Sharing Debacle. My Guard buddy was going and I was going to join him. A couple of days before the meeting he told me that he had spoken with his Rep (can't remember which one..) and was told that it was not a good idea for me to attend.
Ok.. no worries. Life went on. Motch You speak of UNITY - why not do the right thing? Withdraw from the running for F/O rep and give your support for Rob S. That would speak volumes for your sincerity for UNITY. |
Originally Posted by Carolsdanger
(Post 1470226)
I'll call BS BS and BS to this statement.
You speak of UNITY - why not do the right thing? Withdraw from the running for F/O rep and give your support for Rob S. That would speak volumes for your sincerity for UNITY. Ok, so now Unity = Give up So now you want our Rep. bases, our 787's, our Captain seats our growth...what's next our homes, wife's and children??? |
Originally Posted by Kilder
(Post 1470292)
Ok, so now Unity = Give up
So now you want our Rep. bases, our 787's, our Captain seats our growth...what's next our homes, wife's and children??? No, don't want the children. What does the wife look like? Maybe I shouldn't trust your judgment. |
Originally Posted by Carolsdanger
(Post 1470294)
No, don't want the children. What does the wife look like? Maybe I shouldn't trust your judgment.
|
You know, sometimes I simply cannot believe what I read on these forums.
If I was a CAL new hire who happened to be a UAL furloughee, and that bothered the local council, that would be their problem not mine. I cannot imagine any legal justification those CAL guys had to exclude a CAL pilot from a local council meeting. I suspect the reason the guys that were "asked to leave" are keeping quiet is because their attorneys told them so. What a reckless overreach by a "union" council. |
Originally Posted by bbhnpd
(Post 1470662)
You know, sometimes I simply cannot believe what I read on these forums.
If I was a CAL new hire who happened to be a UAL furloughee, and that bothered the local council, that would be their problem not mine. I cannot imagine any legal justification those CAL guys had to exclude a CAL pilot from a local council meeting. I suspect the reason the guys that were "asked to leave" are keeping quiet is because their attorneys told them so. What a reckless overreach by a "union" council. If I remember correctly the L-UAL folks at L-Cal had their dues or assessment split. Part going to normal representation, part going to L-UAL ALPA for SLI representation. So wouldn't it follow that they should be excluded from participating in discussions involving the L-Cal side? |
Originally Posted by Kilder
(Post 1470292)
Ok, so now Unity = Give up
So now you want our Rep. bases, our 787's, our Captain seats our growth...what's next our homes, wife's and children??? |
Originally Posted by APC225
(Post 1470122)
Mitch, In your opinion, having heard what was discussed for these 15 minutes, do you think this was necessary?
Originally Posted by horrido27
(Post 1470211)
My opinion.. after all was said and done, there was nothing super secret or "classified" that would have been an issue. But that was my opinion After The Fact
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:05 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands