Pre-post ISL percentages
#6
Don't say Guppy
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: Guppy driver
Posts: 1,926
I am not sure I like the "hybrid" model, although the results are sort of OK. I don't like the "lumpiness" of the ISL. If you are at one end of a lump you get a windfall, the opposite end you are harmed.
I think I prefer filtering first with status and category, and then within each, filter again on a relative basis, perhaps weighted for longevity of the whole group in the status and category.
It is what it is.
I think I prefer filtering first with status and category, and then within each, filter again on a relative basis, perhaps weighted for longevity of the whole group in the status and category.
It is what it is.
#7
New Hire
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 5
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Pre ISL..........67% (80% active)
Post ISL........64%
Note: I only slid 179 CAL numbers below the UAL proposal. Gained 1800+ CAL numbers from the CAL proposed staple job. That speaks volumes.
Post ISL........64%
Note: I only slid 179 CAL numbers below the UAL proposal. Gained 1800+ CAL numbers from the CAL proposed staple job. That speaks volumes.
Last edited by jsled; 09-04-2013 at 04:45 AM.
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 341
My % on the SLI= 34% and I think I was real close to that on May 2010 CAL list. I do think the only people that have a "beef" on this whole thing are the NON furloughed pilots at CAL that were put behind the furloughed pilots at UAL? One of Hoss's big points!! And no Hoss, I'm not trying to "flame" you, I actually agreed with you on a prior ISL post, I just want to see if you feel the same now that it's CAL pilots getting your "unfair scenario"?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PackTrip
Mergers and Acquisitions
22
12-15-2008 09:48 PM
NetJets_DA2Easy
Fractional
5
07-30-2007 03:23 PM