Search
Notices

Vacancy Bid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2013, 01:04 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,709
Default

I already got awarded my DEN 787 captain bid... I guess the fence is down for me?
Airhoss is offline  
Old 09-24-2013, 01:08 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss View Post
I already got awarded my DEN 787 captain bid... I guess the fence is down for me?
Good for you! Better run and get that training assignment with all the royal guaranteed protections.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 09-24-2013, 01:11 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 168
Default

Not a fence. Just lack of vacancies. They are supposedly hashing out this latest wrinkle in our lovely merger at WHQ. It just never stops. I'm trying to find some humor in it.

It ain't over until the fat United pilot is in his 737 captain seat.

You want to use your seniority? No Vac-eee, No Bid-eee..

Interesting to see what gets decided. The correct path or the grievance path.
Birddog is offline  
Old 09-24-2013, 01:13 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 919
Default

Originally Posted by Birddog View Post
Bumps are based off of TABs not activated pilots. So if a TAB has been assigned under the SFO MOU they can bump the crap out of SFO.

I don't know how many of the 400 are left untrained to bump. But you're getting setup for an expensive lesson.

I find it funny how S-UAL pilots always explain it away when they are possibly about to be hosed. Wouldn't you rather see the TPA, UPA, SFO MOU, and ISL enforced?
I guess I don't know how bumps work for legacy CAL, but for legacy UA, you can only bump to a position that your seniority can hold. Since nobody had started or completed training for a 737 SFO assignment at the time the ISL was implemented (even if they had a TAB assignment) there aren't any pilots that are currently holding a SFO 737 assignment! On the UA side that would mean that anybody who was being bumped (for whatever reason) would not be able to bump to SFO 737. I could definitely see that the pilots that got the SFO 737 assignments would be eligible for a bump, I just don't see how they could then bump to SFO 737, since there are no pilots junior to them assigned there(since there are none at all assigned to a SFO 737 base) . Obviously I am not an expert, but I don't see how anybody could get a bump to an assignment that doesn't exist!

So, I would expect there will be a lot of bumps as you are speculating, but I still don't see how that is going to limit the number of SFO 737 bids that come out.
GoCats67 is offline  
Old 09-24-2013, 01:20 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by Birddog View Post
Not a fence. Just lack of vacancies. They are supposedly hashing out this latest wrinkle in our lovely merger at WHQ. It just never stops. I'm trying to find some humor in it.

It ain't over until the fat United pilot is in his 737 captain seat.

You want to use your seniority? No Vac-eee, No Bid-eee..

Interesting to see what gets decided. The correct path or the grievance path.
I guess all those vacancies just happened to end with 14-02. Now with retirements in full swing the ladder for some mysterious reason has been raised. Fat UAL pilot? That, made me laugh BBQ boy.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 09-24-2013, 01:22 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 168
Default

They're discussing this latest wrinkle in our lovely merger at WHQ. Vacancies won't end, they'll just slow way down if this plan wins. But time is money.

In a CCS memo the S-CAL pilots were told they could bump according to the TABs. Any CAL pilots want to chime in?

Hopefully the company will take the correct path not the grievous path.
Birddog is offline  
Old 09-24-2013, 01:31 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

Originally Posted by Birddog View Post
Hopefully the company will take the correct path not the grievous path.
That is the quote of the year on this forum. Drinks to you!
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 09-24-2013, 01:33 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by Birddog View Post
Seniority is forever, sure. But it doesn't do you a damn bit of good when the bumps fill the place up for a year. Then the bumpee's are protected by the company shrinking the 767's through attrition and going fat on manning reducing vacancies. The S-UAL pilots may be in for a shock. We'll see soon. Hope I'm wrong.
First of all, a year ain't sheet. I could stand on my head that long. Secondly, let's not forget that there are 13- 757s leaving next qtr according to the latest Investor Update on United.com. "Shrinking through attrition" sure looks pretty in print, but in reality, there will be bumps. I got time.

Sled

Last edited by jsled; 09-24-2013 at 01:47 PM.
jsled is offline  
Old 09-24-2013, 02:19 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 400
Default

Well something is holding it up. A day late now. If I was a betting type my money would be on a CAL vs UAL rift over the nature of the bid. Could it be the bid was a whopper one or both of the sides couldn't swallow?
dvhighdrive88 is offline  
Old 09-24-2013, 02:51 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 178
Default

Originally Posted by Birddog View Post
They're discussing this latest wrinkle in our lovely merger at WHQ. Vacancies won't end, they'll just slow way down if this plan wins. But time is money.

In a CCS memo the S-CAL pilots were told they could bump according to the TABs. Any CAL pilots want to chime in?

Hopefully the company will take the correct path not the grievous path.
I think there will be vacancies, just on attrition alone, but whether the company decides to either fly the 757 fat with crews or displace them is the question. Bumping causes A LOT of training events and the training department is already full. Hopefully there will be movement on both sides with no bumping.
Skyflyin is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pilotgolfer
United
45
02-10-2013 10:08 PM
ERJ135
Regional
43
07-21-2008 06:49 PM
HerkDriver
Cargo
5
09-18-2007 01:56 PM
Coffee Bitch
Cargo
115
05-23-2007 08:02 AM
Diesel 10
Cargo
1
08-11-2005 11:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices