![]() |
Originally Posted by OnCenterline
(Post 1693490)
Historically, within ALPA, "membership" ratification is just that: the rank-and-file cast the votes (ex: CBA), as opposed to "MEC" ratification (ex: new policy). At my previous carrier, the MEC made a big show of making sure everyone understood the distinction.
Single issue meaning something like your desired in the original post - "It seems to me that if there is a way to do something like this, it should not only be considered, but put out for a pilot vote once we know the details." Is you old airline CAL? |
Originally Posted by Pkcola
(Post 1693521)
Since you have the inside track to all things ALPA, please give us ONE SINGLE ISSUE VOTE the RANK-IN-FILE (here at good ol' United) has voted on?
Is you old airline CAL? Every airline and every MEC does a few things differently...and I'm still learning the ropes here. |
Originally Posted by OnCenterline
(Post 1693523)
I've only been at UA a year (which I have made clear elsewhere already), so I can't speak to that. And no, the old airline was not CAL. I was simply explaining the difference between the two.
Every airline and every MEC does a few things differently...and I'm still learning the ropes here.
Originally Posted by Pkcola
(Post 1693354)
Like I stated earlier, I've never seen a single issue vote put out to the pilots unless you want to consider the CBA a single issue. It's just history and it's not likely to change.
|
I was just reminded of the assessment vote for insurance support of the furloughed pilots at UAL. That was a rank-in-file pilot vote and it passed with a clear majority.
Is there more? |
Originally Posted by Pkcola
(Post 1693637)
Is there more?
|
Originally Posted by Flytolive
(Post 1693789)
ESOP mid-term pay negotiations (X2), C2000, ERP1, ERP 2, C2003, C2005, furloughee benefits, LCO work rules (X2), SLI assessment, UPA to name a few off the top of my head.
The only one I could close to was the vote for furloughed pilots insurance assessment. They could not impose the assessment and I think it needed a special pilot vote because it wasn't in the contract. Guess a Strike Vote would be another. |
PK
Of the several RJ issues over the years we did have one put to the pilots for a vote, if my memory serves me correctly. Of course we also had the one signed behind our backs by I believe PW. |
I am noticing a trend here. Many seem to think the form of government we have with ALPA is a democracy where everything has to be voted upon. Well in reality we have a representative form of government. What this means is we empower our associated council reps to act on our behalf. This also means, outside of required membership ratification issues, they can vote on a subject in a manner which may seem against our desires because they have "better" and more "valid" information from which to decide with.
Of course many pilots want control over the minutia and forget this. |
Originally Posted by Regularguy
(Post 1693933)
I am noticing a trend here. Many seem to think the form of government we have with ALPA is a democracy where everything has to be voted upon. Well in reality we have a representative form of government. What this means is we empower our associated council reps to act on our behalf. This also means, outside of required membership ratification issues, they can vote on a subject in a manner which may seem against our desires because they have "better" and more "valid" information from which to decide with.
Of course many pilots want control over the minutia and forget this. ^^^^^^^ Well said ^^^^^^^^ |
Originally Posted by Pkcola
(Post 1693827)
Correct, those are all contract/money issues and require pilot ratification.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:12 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands