![]() |
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 1698498)
Stupid question I guess but why does the 320 work better in IAH and the 737 better in Denver? Seems like a lot of shuck and jive for very little real world benefit?
|
Originally Posted by Pkcola
(Post 1698537)
I thought most of the 737 fleet had gone through the wifi/entertainment update and all new 737 are equipped with wifi/entertainment system from the get go. 36% seems a little low - doesn't sound right. What do you 737 guys say?
What's happening to Jeff's 2 class / 2 airplane type airline. Did somebody educate him? Inflight Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi Coverage | United Airlines Note, not a single 67 or 87 has WiFi. Does that make any sense from a customer standpoint? |
Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
(Post 1698544)
T38,
Fwiw, via a flight mgr, the airbii used acft order has been quashed. |
Originally Posted by steve0617
(Post 1698718)
Right off the UAL website.
Inflight Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi Coverage | United Airlines Note, not a single 67 or 87 has WiFi. Does that make any sense from a customer standpoint? Looking at Delta, they appear to be much further along with their fleet having Wi-Fi service. The Gogo service they have though is limited to the coverage map below. What we are putting in as I understand it is satellite based Wi-Fi that won't have the coverage limitations. I could see why this would be a more time consuming and expensive system to put in. In the end it will allow coverage on legs outside the U.S. We do have the Gogo system on the PS 757s, but for the routes they always fly that works fine. I wonder what the issues might be mounting a satellite receiver dome up on top of the 787 composite tube though? Gogo Inflight Internet - Participating Airlines http://content.delta.com/content/www...000451907Z.png Gogo Has the U.S. Covered Delta Connect and Gogo are available on Gogo equipped flights within the continental U.S. and portions of Alaska*. With Delta and Gogo, you can surf the sky knowing that we have you covered on Gogo equipped flights within the entire continental U.S. & Alaska. *Service is not available outside the continental USA and Alaska as shown. Some parts of Alaska may experience interruptions. Check My Trips to see if Wi-Fi is available on your flight. |
I would think you wouldn't have to mount it on top...the signal could go through the aircraft fuselage skin.
For that matter, you could put it in an outer portion of the wing, and let it through the composite skin, in a portion that is just an empty bay. |
Originally Posted by steve0617
(Post 1698718)
Right off the UAL website.
Inflight Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi Coverage | United Airlines Note, not a single 67 or 87 has WiFi. Does that make any sense from a customer standpoint? And no, it makes no sense from a customer-service standpoint. We need to get this done. Apparently, there is no STC for a system on the 787 yet. |
Originally Posted by gettinbumped
(Post 1698728)
For now.... I heard the China airplanes got snagged out from under us. But I believe the search continues
|
Here's my guess:
I think there is still a slight excess in training capacity on the Bus. If they had a few extra Buses, they could send some of the new 737s to get modified with wifi/entertainment systems. Once complete, they could keep the Buses, or park them. Used airplanes, intended for short-time use, would be cheap to acquire, and have no long-term maintenance costs (ie, D-checks). This would reduce the training footprint on the 737 as well. |
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 1698498)
Stupid question I guess but why does the 320 work better in IAH and the 737 better in Denver? Seems like a lot of shuck and jive for very little real world benefit?
|
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 1698498)
Stupid question I guess but why does the 320 work better in IAH and the 737 better in Denver? Seems like a lot of shuck and jive for very little real world benefit?
|
Originally Posted by Mitch Rapp05
(Post 1698658)
Great point. You'd think if they allow this to play out in the long term via attrition and growth they'd ending saving a lot more money than displacing so many pilots short term. The gain doesn't seem to be worth it.
|
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 1699203)
I was told that it is because the cargo doors on the 320 open outward, 737 opens inward. This allows the 320 to carry bigger cargo pallets in and out of Mexico and Central America.
|
Originally Posted by Pkcola
(Post 1699222)
Are Airbus and 737 airplanes doing palletized loads now?
I would assume flowers and fruit are not free loaded........ |
Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 1699215)
We saw 50% RSV coverage on the 76T in Denver last summer. That meant about 50 Captains and 50 FOs were getting paid 15K and 10K per month to do remodeling projects around the house. Not so bad this summer, but now 25- 757s are retiring just in the second half of this year. There are big costs associated with not displacing as well. In fact, Mr. Papaleo seems to think the benefits of this displacement will far outweigh the costs, or so he says.
|
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 1699226)
No idea just passing on what I was told.
I would assume flowers and fruit are not free loaded........ |
It's out...buh bye Lcal DEN guppy folks. Enjoy.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:51 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands