![]() |
Gates and wingspans
Just curious if anyone knows how the wingspans of the 787-10 and A350-1000 will fit into our current gates. Im assuming the wingspans are longer than the 777-200.
Im specifically curious about how we are going to be getting our new wide body fleets wedged into EWR and SFO. Less gates? Can the lines be re-drawn, or are they maxed out? Or will EWR and SFO be where the 777 goes to die. |
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 1699183)
Just curious if anyone knows how the wingspans of the 787-10 and A350-1000 will fit into our current gates. Im assuming the wingspans are longer than the 777-200.
Im specifically curious about how we are going to be getting our new wide body fleets wedged into EWR and SFO. Less gates? Can the lines be re-drawn, or are they maxed out? Or will EWR and SFO be where the 777 goes to die. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1699250)
You can quickly google the wingspans of any aircraft. The 787-10 has a slightly shorter span then the 777-200/300.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1699250)
You can quickly google the wingspans of any aircraft. The 787-10 has a slightly shorter span then the 777-200/300.
So the 350 is 213ft guess the extra 14ft on the 777 won't be to much of a problem. Thanks |
Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
(Post 1699258)
Bet that mechanic moving the 777 in Ord the other day wished it was a 787.
|
How bad was it?
|
Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer
(Post 1699336)
How bad was it?
|
Originally Posted by guppyflyer
(Post 1699520)
Well.....a -400 AND a 777 are down for months and may be scrapped. Other than that, it's all good! :D 777 wing went through the nose of the -400 and damaged the pressure bulkhead, the 777 needs 20ft of new wing, both are AOG for a long while IF they are determined to still be of value. Rumor was the -400 may be beer cans.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:15 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands