Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   15-01v (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/83451-15-01v.html)

APC225 08-22-2014 11:23 AM

15-01v
 
155 new positions.

12 EWR 777 CA
4 ORD 777 CA
4 IAH 777 CA
10 SFO 787 FO
15 LAX 787 FO
5 IAH 787 FO
35 IAH 320 CA
25 IAH 320 FO
35 EWR 320 CA
10 EWR 76T FO

El Guapo 08-22-2014 11:28 AM

90 capt positions is nice.

Scrappy 08-22-2014 11:56 AM

It will be interesting to see how senior the LAX 78 FO slots go. Last time they had jr. Capts bidding into LAX 78 FO. SFO and IAH not so much.

unitedflyier 08-22-2014 11:56 AM


Originally Posted by APC225 (Post 1710349)
155 new positions.

12 EWR 777 CA
4 ORD 777 CA
4 IAH 777 CA
10 SFO 787 FO
15 LAX 787 FO
5 IAH 787 FO
35 IAH 320 CA
25 IAH 320 FO
35 EWR 320 CA
10 EWR 76T FO

Please post the results so we can see how junior they went. Thanks

:-)

SpecialTracking 08-22-2014 12:23 PM

They should do one system bid.

ron kent 08-22-2014 02:19 PM


Originally Posted by SpecialTracking (Post 1710400)
They should do one system bid.

That would require more than an "evolving plan".

Scrappy 08-22-2014 02:28 PM


Originally Posted by SpecialTracking (Post 1710400)
They should do one system bid.

We used to do 2 large ones at L-CAL per year....essentially winter and summer. My understanding is the new onsie- twosie monthly approach is adopted from L-UAL no?

cadetdrivr 08-22-2014 02:39 PM


Originally Posted by Scrappy (Post 1710502)
We used to do 2 large ones at L-CAL per year....essentially winter and summer. My understanding is the new onsie- twosie monthly approach is adopted from L-UAL no?

Essentially, yes.

But importantly the bids are based on Manpower requirements. There is no set timetable for vacancy bids so during times of "movement" there will be lots of bids while there can also also be longs periods with only minor bids (recent example: the "shadow" when the retirement age changed to 65 while the LUAL fleet was simultaneously static.)

SpecialTracking 08-22-2014 02:47 PM


Originally Posted by ron kent (Post 1710493)
That would require more than an "evolving plan".

No doubt. They were shocked when the pilots in Denver didn't follow the plane and chose to bump to the guppy and not commute. Why would they be shocked? Isn't that pretty much what happened when the yoinked the 400 out of Ord to "make it more reliable?"

Scrappy 08-22-2014 03:03 PM


Originally Posted by SpecialTracking (Post 1710520)
...yoinked the 400 out of Ord to "make it more reliable?"

More United 747's coming to SFO - TravelSkills

"...the 747 operation focused on SFO where maintenance is will help improve reliability...The bad news is coach still sucks."

Article from Dec 2012


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:19 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands