|
Originally Posted by svergin
(Post 2015369)
The entire idea was to prove a point. We keep talking about how we will get these improvements "next time". Well we didn't get them in C2012, we didn't get them in this TA, so what makes you think a NO vote will result in getting them on the next one.
Yes, there is risk in accepting this TA. There is also risk in not accepting this TA. In 2 years we could have a terrible economy and be losing money when we open contract negotiations. We could also be making $8B per year in profits and glad that we weren't still locked into 4 more years of C2016. |
Yeah, times are relatively good now, making $$$ with lower cost fuel. It all depends on what's offered, but in general current conditions are favorable for negotiations.
Haven't seen details of course. I'd be incline to 'yes' if it's reasonable. YMMV |
71% yea voter I predict if it comes to ratification
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:16 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands