![]() |
Originally Posted by Gilligan13
(Post 2056934)
Sac isn't bad. Davis would be the spot. Denver isn't that much cheaper and there is a reason people want to live here.
|
Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 2056960)
Moving to Cali, which I would love to do, seems almost impossible. That is, unless I don't mind driving 2+ hours to work. Yuck.
WAY better than being a slave to your mortgage. |
Originally Posted by Winston
(Post 2057041)
You gotta just get into a groove: zen out on a couple of podcast/Audibe, or put on the Giants game and relax. You know it's an even year, right?
WAY better than being a slave to your mortgage. |
Originally Posted by Sparta
(Post 2057184)
The pilots who bought closer in to SFO over the past twenty years have seen a lot more house appreciation than those who bought in the far flung suburbs...
Besides, trying to swallow the mortgage on a $1.5M house on an a newhire salary (I believe that was the OP's situation) is, in a word, impossible. 100 miles away that same house in a good neighborhood could be bought at a third the price. Dig these charts for, The Bay Area: http://www.realdatasf.com/wp-content...-included2.jpg SF itself: https://thefrontsteps.files.wordpres...7/image002.jpg |
So 1+30 out of SFO isn't unreasonable then? Kind've spoiled right now with 8 acres and plenty of woods to dirtbike and atv on.
Surprised some suggest as far away as Tahoe. I might start looking a bit more, but still have this idea that I'll hate myself after taxes and the like... |
Originally Posted by PA Slammer
(Post 2057327)
So 1+30 out of SFO isn't unreasonable then? Kind've spoiled right now with 8 acres and plenty of woods to dirtbike and atv on.
Surprised some suggest as far away as Tahoe. I might start looking a bit more, but still have this idea that I'll hate myself after taxes and the like... |
Originally Posted by jsled
(Post 2056960)
My problem is I moved to Denver 13 years ago. It's not expensive at all for me. Moving to Cali, which I would love to do, seems almost impossible. That is, unless I don't mind driving 2+ hours to work. Yuck.
|
Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
(Post 2057406)
Right now, I'd say it's a stretch to say 1.5 hours is reasonable for a middle-upper income couple w/a kid. Given the mentality of the typical airline pilot, I'd say no chance in Hades to find reasonable. It's awful hard to say the drive is 1.5 hours without traffic cause Bay Area traffic is early and often. Sorry mate but rule number one about California; if you are going to dwell on the taxes, don't bother trying it.
|
Originally Posted by Gilligan13
(Post 2059261)
If you were commuting to Oak 1.5 would be possible from Sac. Between 10-2 that would be possible at Sfo.
Foothills east of Stockton will give you most bang for your buck. Calaveras County has decent schools and land is reasonably cheap. I'd also look in the Lodi area. Nice town about 15 mins North of Stockton .. that'd be right at 1+45 to SFO, no traffic. |
Originally Posted by SeamusTheHound
(Post 2056368)
I don't live in NorCal, or even California for that matter, but I do have this question for those who would say that it's "not worth it" to live there:
If these areas that are so expensive are not "worth it" to live there, then why is there so much demand that is driving the housing market so high? Obviously lots of people are willing to pay to live there, creating demand and scarcity. Always struck me that it's more expensive to live "somewhere" than it is to live "nowhere." |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:03 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands