![]() |
A320 future in EWR
What's going on with the A320 in EWR? For a while it seemed like they were increasing staffing levels and now on this recent bid their going from 91 captains today down to 73 captains by May. I would think with the introduction of the additional 320s we are getting from China would increase flying. Anyone know what's up?
|
from the recent flight ops update:
EWR – The A320 flying in EWR is sharply decreasing due to the concentration of the 320 departures out of four of our hubs (ORD, DEN, IAH and SFO, which contain 80% of the hub departures). This means most of the A320 departures for in the NYC area are actually out of LGA. Our EWR base is properly staffed on this fleet, and will continue to provide the required staffing to operate those flights out of EWR and LGA. |
Originally Posted by pilot772
(Post 2077976)
from the recent flight ops update:
EWR – The A320 flying in EWR is sharply decreasing due to the concentration of the 320 departures out of four of our hubs (ORD, DEN, IAH and SFO, which contain 80% of the hub departures). This means most of the A320 departures for in the NYC area are actually out of LGA. Our EWR base is properly staffed on this fleet, and will continue to provide the required staffing to operate those flights out of EWR and LGA. IF you look at the bid packages it seems most flying is still concentrated out of EWR. Something doesn't make sense here? So properly staffed would mean no more reductions? No? |
Yeah not sure, going back the last three vacancy bids the min staffing has been 70, 72, 73. The Max number has decreased my guess is they feel comfortable with the staffing but they have left the minimum low to avoid backfills.
|
Originally Posted by pilot772
(Post 2077992)
Yeah not sure, going back the last three vacancy bids the min staffing has been 70, 72, 73. The Max number has decreased my guess is they feel comfortable with the staffing but they have left the minimum low to avoid backfills.
Who knows what their plan is? I would surmise that they don't Even know. |
Originally Posted by Bestglide
(Post 2078030)
Possibly, but there are 5 or 6 back fills on the current bid.
Who knows what their plan is? I would surmise that they don't Even know. They are going focusing the Airbus hub flying out of DEN, IAH, SFO, and ORD. These hubs will be set up to do major reliability maintenance at night. More and more of the New York Airbus flying will be flown out of LGA. The February mix of EWR/LGA was 50%/50%. It improved slightly in March to 60%/40%, but their stated intentions are to sharply decrease EWR Airbus flying. If you look at the staffing min max numbers going back about 18 months, they've gone from a min of about 100 captains to a min of 73. At the same time, they've grown the SFO Airbus captains from a min of 100 to a min near 150. Not the best news for us New York Airbus folks, unless you live closer to LGA. |
Yeah, I actually started thinking about an LGA crashpad since the changes have taken place. I haven't flown out of EWR since early January.
|
What about DCA?
|
Originally Posted by rp2pilot
(Post 2078045)
Big picture, per the flight ops update..
They are going focusing the Airbus hub flying out of DEN, IAH, SFO, and ORD. These hubs will be set up to do major reliability maintenance at night. More and more of the New York Airbus flying will be flown out of LGA. The February mix of EWR/LGA was 50%/50%. It improved slightly in March to 60%/40%, but their stated intentions are to sharply decrease EWR Airbus flying. If you look at the staffing min max numbers going back about 18 months, they've gone from a min of about 100 captains to a min of 73. At the same time, they've grown the SFO Airbus captains from a min of 100 to a min near 150. Not the best news for us New York Airbus folks, unless you live closer to LGA. They seem to be keeping the max around the high 80s. Do you think that number will slip to 73? Thanks for the info. |
Originally Posted by Isuav8or
(Post 2078067)
What about DCA?
|
To add to the conversation, I'm trying to get to lax on the bus. The latest bid doesn't have any vacancies in lax. Anyone know what the outlook might be for lax and the bus.
|
Originally Posted by Bestglide
(Post 2078069)
So where are all the additional busses going?
They seem to be keeping the max around the high 80s. Do you think that number will slip to 73? Thanks for the info. |
Originally Posted by Triumph
(Post 2078106)
To add to the conversation, I'm trying to get to lax on the bus. The latest bid doesn't have any vacancies in lax. Anyone know what the outlook might be for lax and the bus.
|
Awesome news!! And I just bid over to the Bus from the 73 in EWR! --eye roll--
|
Originally Posted by flightmedic01
(Post 2078360)
Awesome news!! And I just bid over to the Bus from the 73 in EWR! --eye roll--
|
Originally Posted by flightmedic01
(Post 2078360)
Awesome news!! And I just bid over to the Bus from the 73 in EWR! --eye roll--
|
Had a MX issue on the Bus in EWR last week. Called up hub MX ready to push off the gate. The guy asked us to repeat our nose number and then says, "oh geez, you're a Bus. Thought you were a 73, in that case give me a minute." We were able to fix the problem, and his reply, "thank god!" Guess they are not real Bus familiar in EWR. LOL
|
Originally Posted by 130drvr
(Post 2078442)
Had a MX issue on the Bus in EWR last week. Called up hub MX ready to push off the gate. The guy asked us to repeat our nose number and then says, "oh geez, you're a Bus. Thought you were a 73, in that case give me a minute." We were able to fix the problem, and his reply, "thank god!" Guess they are not real Bus familiar in EWR. LOL
|
Originally Posted by Grumble
(Post 2078683)
Yes, it's not a 50 year old guppy. Leave your hammer and duct tape in the tool box.
|
Originally Posted by Jaded N Cynical
(Post 2078730)
50 year old guppy? I thought those were all parked to make the merger happen.
|
Originally Posted by UALinIAH
(Post 2078870)
Even the new ones are 50 year old technology. They just have fresh paint, some glass and stretched beyond any normal design limits. It's a POS. After flying this plane I've learned the 737NG means no good.
|
Originally Posted by Probe
(Post 2078887)
I think the Recall buttons were recycled from 50 year old ones. And somehow, they found a bunch of toilet seats that won't stay up.
|
Originally Posted by Jaded N Cynical
(Post 2078730)
50 year old guppy? I thought those were all parked to make the merger happen.
|
Originally Posted by UALinIAH
(Post 2078870)
Even the new ones are 50 year old technology.
|
Any thoughts on whether there will be TDYs this summer from EWR 320s to other domiciles with the surplus of F/Os?
|
Originally Posted by Viperstick
(Post 2080368)
Any thoughts on whether there will be TDYs this summer from EWR 320s to other domiciles with the surplus of F/Os?
|
Just wondering how many jump seats on the bus?
Thanks... |
Originally Posted by Bestglide
(Post 2087153)
Just wondering how many jump seats on the bus?
Thanks... |
Originally Posted by Bestglide
(Post 2087153)
Just wondering how many jump seats on the bus?
Thanks... |
From a recent ALPA email:
*************For the forseeable future, NYC Airbus flying will be concentrated in LGA. If starting trips in LGA is not good for you, it is time to consider changing aircraft or base. ************* Just wonderful. Guess I'll be bidding Dulles. |
Originally Posted by flightmedic01
(Post 2128526)
From a recent ALPA email:
*************For the forseeable future, NYC Airbus flying will be concentrated in LGA. If starting trips in LGA is not good for you, it is time to consider changing aircraft or base. ************* Just wonderful. Guess I'll be bidding Dulles. Lets see how junior EWR 320 CA goes now......I'm not sure how much of an affect it will have seeing as how it used to be JFK 320 which was almost all LGA flying with a sprinkling of EWR. Will be interesting to watch. |
This rat fled the sinking ship. Some three month new hire is about to become a lineholder.
Message me if you want advice on how to get to LGA from EWR at 5 AM. |
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 2128542)
Lets see how junior EWR 320 CA goes now......I'm not sure how much of an affect it will have seeing as how it used to be JFK 320 which was almost all LGA flying with a sprinkling of EWR.
Will be interesting to watch. From my location in PA, LGA and EWR are about equal driving times so the shift doesn't directly impact me. The shrinking base, however, does, as my relative seniority has dropped all the way back to where it was 18 months ago. |
Originally Posted by rp2pilot
(Post 2128609)
Probably have zero effect or, alternatively, make the list even more senior as the junior Captains are bailing. The majority (>90%) of the EWR 320 Captains are legacy United, and most of them live closer to LGA/JFK than they do EWR, particularly the most senior ones. For most, getting across the Hudson to EWR is painful. Further, why would they bid to the 757 that pays the same rate but adds 45-60 mins to their drive.
From my location in PA, LGA and EWR are about equal driving times so the shift doesn't directly impact me. The shrinking base, however, does, as my relative seniority has dropped all the way back to where it was 18 months ago. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:56 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands