![]() |
Vacancy bid?
Any ideas when we might see a new vacancy bid?
|
In June and one a month after that.
|
Originally Posted by 89Pistons
(Post 2136281)
In June and one a month after that.
|
As others have said next month. I'm sure they want to evaluate where the displacements go before they drop a bid as those number will have some effect on staffing levels.
SSC rep on the UALpilot forum mentioned a lot of bids coming from June on due to all the new aircraft we're receiving before summer '17 flying. |
Howard's weekly fireside chat yesterday said the same thing.
|
Thank you, everyone 👍
|
I've heard approximately 150, 777 Capt bids...The training center is furiously training new 777 instructors at the moment. So there might be some truth to it.
|
Originally Posted by Airhoss
(Post 2136773)
I've heard approximately 150, 777 Capt bids...The training center is furiously training new 777 instructors at the moment. So there might be some truth to it.
|
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
(Post 2136786)
Where there is smoke there is fire. 14 777-300ERs in a six month period is a pretty aggressive delivery schedule on the widebody side of the airline.
|
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
(Post 2136786)
Where there is smoke there is fire. 14 777-300ERs in a six month period is a pretty aggressive delivery schedule on the widebody side of the airline.
That seems very aggressive. Can Boeing even deliver on that schedule? |
Originally Posted by baseball
(Post 2137174)
That seems very aggressive. Can Boeing even deliver on that schedule?
Yup, Boeing builds 7 to 8 777s per month. In the case of these orders, UAL grabbed production slots of aircraft that KLM/AF cancelled which is why they were available at short notice. |
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
(Post 2137180)
2 per month?
Yup, they build 7 to 8 777s per month. |
Originally Posted by baseball
(Post 2137181)
Cool. I hope we have the crews for them and the routes ready to rock and roll. That is some seriously good growth in a seriously awesome fleet type. Good trips, great QoL, and a decent paycheck for those crews.
|
2016: Dec x1
2017: Jan x2, Feb x2, Mar x3, Apr x2 |
Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
(Post 2137183)
We'll see the bids to staff them starting in June. According to the fleet planners the primary use initially will be up-gauging existing EWR markets and then the 777-200s will backfill other markets. It's not as rosy as it could first appear because UA also brought 5 787s orders forward. Combined it's enough airframes to permit the earlier than planned retirements of the 747s so the net result is only mild growth.
30 percent increase of pilot roster for the 777 at ORD and that will be mostly filled by the B744 displaced pilots |
Originally Posted by Sniper66
(Post 2137279)
30 percent increase of pilot roster for the 777 at ORD
and that will be mostly filled by the B744 displaced pilots |
Originally Posted by svergin
(Post 2137327)
According to the snapshot many of them are leaving for 787 CA/FO. Will be interesting to see where the rest go.
|
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 2137916)
5 out of 15 bumps but the fleet is also growing.
Are you expecting to see open FOs slots on the 777 at ORD in the next upcoming bid next week or so |
Originally Posted by Sniper66
(Post 2137957)
Are you expecting to see open FOs slots on the 777 at ORD in the next upcoming bid next week or so
I'm just going off of what's written in the mid-May Crew Resources Update and the planned delivery schedule. The Crew Resources Update indicates the greatest staffing demands will be in SFO and ORD. Since they're delivering ~2 777s per month starting in December, I'd expect training to temporarily overstaff the 777 so that there are adequate crews to fly all of the new metal. I don't know how fast new crews can be trained but staffing 2 new aircraft a month sounds like a bit more than they can handle in the training pipeline. |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 2138020)
Since they're delivering ~2 777s per month starting in December, I'd expect training to temporarily overstaff the 777 so that there are adequate crews to fly all of the new metal. I don't know how fast new crews can be trained but staffing 2 new aircraft a month sounds like a bit more than they can handle in the training pipeline.
|
Originally Posted by Ottolillienthal
(Post 2138084)
Maybe that explains the over staffing of IAH 777. they have the crews trained and ready to go. Likely they'll just build those trips out of IAH and DH crews to ORD and SFO.
They can do that (overstaff the IAH 777) for a while but it's not efficient use of crews. Hopefully the number of IAH 777 pilots declines to match flying out of IAH before the 777 training backlog is eliminated. Once they've got rid of the training backlog (after all 777s are delivered), if there's still a large surplus at IAH, they can (and probably will) do a displacement bid. Again, I don't have any insight on United's schedule or manning issues so my opinion isn't the most informed on this matter. |
Originally Posted by Ottolillienthal
(Post 2138084)
Maybe that explains the over staffing of IAH 777. they have the crews trained and ready to go. Likely they'll just build those trips out of IAH and DH crews to ORD and SFO.
The May crew resource said there would be CA vacancies in IAH to match the FO over staffing. I assume this means that as an FO leaves they will not be backfilled. They will let the IAH 787 die on the vine and move all frames to to SFO/LAX. Just my theory.... |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:38 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands