Notices

C-171 CA Rep election

Old 06-23-2016, 02:17 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,029
Default

Originally Posted by Knotcher View Post
Chuck was dismissed simply for being lcal and no other reason. His ire was directed at those responsible, not the line pilots.
His BS rants on the UALPilots forum were not just at those responsible. He felt he was released because he was lcal. The others on the committee have a different view. I wasn't there in the room when it happened so I have know idea which side is true. But the rants were unacceptable.
UALinIAH is offline  
Old 06-23-2016, 02:20 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Shrek's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,814
Default

Originally Posted by Knotcher View Post
Chuck was dismissed simply for being lcal and no other reason. His ire was directed at those responsible, not the line pilots.
Yeah......THAT'S the ticket - lol.
Shrek is offline  
Old 06-23-2016, 02:27 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flyguppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: IAH 320 CA
Posts: 190
Default

Originally Posted by Knotcher View Post
Chuck was dismissed simply for being lcal and no other reason. His ire was directed at those responsible, not the line pilots.
Total and utter B.S.

And his comments saying that was the only reason completely DISQUALIFIES him from being the IAH Captain rep, in my opinion.
Flyguppy is offline  
Old 06-23-2016, 02:33 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by Shrek View Post
The SAME Chuck Cummins that was so anti-UAL after being let go from the Safety Committee awhile back right after the MEC merge ?!

Better dig a little deeper........
Clearly Staller's endorsement carries heavy weight. Just ask him. Also remember Chuck knows with precision how to time the stock market. Trust your B Plan and 401K in Chuck.
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Old 06-23-2016, 03:01 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Default

So, I take it that you endorse Chuckie. Is that because he knows how the system works? Or is it a pure and simple LCAL against ALL recommendation. I take it he's your financial advisor as well.
AllenAllert is offline  
Old 06-23-2016, 03:07 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by AllenAllert View Post
So, I take it that you endorse Chuckie. Is that because he knows how the system works? Or is it a pure and simple LCAL against ALL recommendation.
Given that you seem to have completely fumbled the background of one candidate, clealry the endorsement of a flamer like you is at best ill advised.
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Old 06-23-2016, 03:07 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,121
Default

Originally Posted by AllenAllert View Post
So, I take it that you endorse Chuckie. Is that because he knows how the system works? Or is it a pure and simple LCAL against ALL recommendation. I take it he's your financial advisor as well.
You have gone completely off the deep end.......
MasterOfPuppets is online now  
Old 06-23-2016, 03:59 PM
  #18  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Default

Originally Posted by intrepidcv11 View Post
Given that you seem to have completely fumbled the background of one candidate, clealry the endorsement of a flamer like you is at best ill advised.
Maybe he should have been a little more clear about his intent and plans for the #171. The other two made it fairly simple as to intent. Your man seems to more like Gordon B stepping in to save the day and gone before the ink dries. Why don't you rewrite his proffer? Is he part of the dark side of LCAL history? In what years and what bases was he a Captain and F/O rep? Do we really have a "sufficient contract" or is that his code for doing backroom deals with management?

I'm a LUAL guy that supports a LCAL guy - what's wrong with that?

Last edited by AllenAllert; 06-23-2016 at 04:10 PM.
AllenAllert is offline  
Old 06-23-2016, 09:21 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Posts: 488
Default

Originally Posted by Flyguppy View Post
Total and utter B.S.

And his comments saying that was the only reason completely DISQUALIFIES him from being the IAH Captain rep, in my opinion.
Yea so you tell us why since you seem to have the answers. Couldn't have been his record, which was exemplary at saving pilots from management and FAA action.
Knotcher is offline  
Old 06-24-2016, 02:15 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 169
Default

FYI having a base with a large amount of pilots does matter because although most MEC votes are senatorial (1 rep, 1 vote), certain cases allow a roll-call vote, in which each rep votes with the number of pilots they represent.

Without commenting on the individuals, I think it's great that 3 pilots have stepped up for the position.

Please vote!
Deafguppy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Birddog
United
4
11-07-2015 09:55 AM
TANSTAAFL
Major
728
10-30-2013 01:18 PM
RPC Unity
Union Talk
122
10-26-2011 02:11 PM
CapeTeamComm
Part 135
7
06-14-2009 06:13 PM
cptmorgancrunch
Regional
5
10-21-2008 05:17 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices