C-171 CA Rep election
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,029
His BS rants on the UALPilots forum were not just at those responsible. He felt he was released because he was lcal. The others on the committee have a different view. I wasn't there in the room when it happened so I have know idea which side is true. But the rants were unacceptable.
#13
And his comments saying that was the only reason completely DISQUALIFIES him from being the IAH Captain rep, in my opinion.
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Clearly Staller's endorsement carries heavy weight. Just ask him. Also remember Chuck knows with precision how to time the stock market. Trust your B Plan and 401K in Chuck.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Given that you seem to have completely fumbled the background of one candidate, clealry the endorsement of a flamer like you is at best ill advised.
#17
#18
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
I'm a LUAL guy that supports a LCAL guy - what's wrong with that?
Last edited by AllenAllert; 06-23-2016 at 04:10 PM.
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Posts: 488
Yea so you tell us why since you seem to have the answers. Couldn't have been his record, which was exemplary at saving pilots from management and FAA action.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 169
FYI having a base with a large amount of pilots does matter because although most MEC votes are senatorial (1 rep, 1 vote), certain cases allow a roll-call vote, in which each rep votes with the number of pilots they represent.
Without commenting on the individuals, I think it's great that 3 pilots have stepped up for the position.
Please vote!
Without commenting on the individuals, I think it's great that 3 pilots have stepped up for the position.
Please vote!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post