Search
Notices

UAL MEC on Fox News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2017, 01:02 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 1,029
Default UAL MEC on Fox News

American flight industry jobs in trouble?| Latest News Videos | Fox News


Great interview.
UALinIAH is offline  
Old 02-02-2017, 01:25 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Good job Ev!

Looks like the full court press:

U.S. Airlines, Unions Appeal To Incoming Cabinet | AWIN_Commercial content from Aviation Week

U.S. airline CEOs ask to meet with Tillerson on Gulf carriers | Reuters
awax is offline  
Old 02-02-2017, 01:28 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: 747 Captain, retired
Posts: 928
Default

Originally Posted by UALinIAH View Post
Great Interview but what a joke. The MEC supported Hillary and now that Trump wins ALPA wants to grovel to president Trump. This Norwegian deal was approved "under the most Labor-Friendly Democratic President", who our MEC backed. I certainly hope that Labor FINALLY see's what political party has their best interest in mind
krudawg is offline  
Old 02-02-2017, 01:33 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Position: 6th place
Posts: 1,826
Default

Originally Posted by krudawg View Post
Great Interview but what a joke. The MEC supported Hillary and now that Trump wins ALPA wants to grovel to president Trump. This Norwegian deal was approved "under the most Labor-Friendly Democratic President", who our MEC backed. I certainly hope that Labor FINALLY see's what political party has their best interest in mind


Are you high? Didn't trump just introduce a federal right to work law?

Republican union members... still scratching my head about that oxymoron.
mainlineAF is offline  
Old 02-02-2017, 01:49 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by krudawg View Post
Great Interview but what a joke. The MEC supported Hillary and now that Trump wins ALPA wants to grovel to president Trump. This Norwegian deal was approved "under the most Labor-Friendly Democratic President", who our MEC backed. I certainly hope that Labor FINALLY see's what political party has their best interest in mind
Uh....endorsed Clinton specifically because she had given support on this very issue, at the time Trump had not, and still has not.

“Secretary Clinton supports union members, and specifically supports pilot-partisan solutions that directly affect the livelihood and careers of all ALPA pilots. The United MEC recognizes her commitment to our issues, including her opposition to the NAI flag of convenience scheme, and endorses her for President,” said MEC Chairman Captain Todd Insler.
Make America Great Again, America First, American Workers First. that's the rhetoric from his campaign, but have we actually seen any action that directly benefits the American worker (not corporations, actual workers). Here's an excellent chance for him to walk the walk.
awax is offline  
Old 02-02-2017, 01:57 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,750
Default

Originally Posted by krudawg View Post
Great Interview but what a joke. The MEC supported Hillary and now that Trump wins ALPA wants to grovel to president Trump. This Norwegian deal was approved "under the most Labor-Friendly Democratic President", who our MEC backed. I certainly hope that Labor FINALLY see's what political party has their best interest in mind
The Open Skies Agreement that Norwegian applied under was NOT approved under Obama. That would be Bush II. The Obama administration did delay NAI for over 3 years though.

Republicans have our best interests in mind? Quit smoking that chit, pops.

GOP introduces national right-to-work legislation | Washington Examiner

And now we don't have Obama (or Clinton) to veto this caca.
jsled is offline  
Old 02-02-2017, 02:19 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by mainlineAF View Post
Are you high? Didn't trump just introduce a federal right to work law?

Republican union members... still scratching my head about that oxymoron.
Trump doesn't care really if it's union, or non-union. What he cares about, I think is that US workers and their famalies stay afloat, and benefit financially. Moreover, he wants the tax revenues and he wants healthy US companies.

The right to work stuff really affects states. He doesn't care if a company is located in North Carolina, or South Carolina. He just doesn't want them to move to South America.
baseball is offline  
Old 02-02-2017, 02:21 PM
  #8  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,512
Default

Originally Posted by mainlineAF View Post
Are you high? Didn't trump just introduce a federal right to work law?.


No, Trump did not.

Two Republican Congressmen, however, did.
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 02-02-2017, 02:22 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Does anyone know why the Obama Administration approved the NAI application to operate if they were doing this flag of convenience thing?

Seems pretty silly for Obama to throw the aviation industry under the bus. If they bring in a bunch of foreigners, that's allot of tax revenues that won't stay here. Not only do US companies fail, but employees cease making money, and the money that foreigners are making won't be taxed here.
baseball is offline  
Old 02-02-2017, 02:33 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by baseball View Post
Does anyone know why the Obama Administration approved the NAI application to operate if they were doing this flag of convenience thing?

Seems pretty silly for Obama to throw the aviation industry under the bus. If they bring in a bunch of foreigners, that's allot of tax revenues that won't stay here. Not only do US companies fail, but employees cease making money, and the money that foreigners are making won't be taxed here.
Unless it was an slam dunk opportunity for either campaign to take easy and immediate action. Setting the stage for either to pick the low hanging fruit so to speak and take credit for standing up for the American worker.

Trump has every impetus to reverse the application, I can hear the sound bites now "We reversed the action of a secret muslim who was a total disaster and today we continue to make America great again".

For Clinton, the rhetoric would be toned down, but still an easy win to appear pro-worker.

With respect to today's reality, it's going to be all-telling to see if he walks the walk or is just another windbag politician.
awax is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kayco
United
190
08-07-2022 12:19 PM
ReserveDog
United
46
05-23-2014 07:23 AM
jsled
United
7
11-28-2012 11:08 PM
Pinchanickled
Regional
33
12-17-2010 06:58 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices