![]() |
Originally Posted by Knotcher
(Post 2301437)
Oh boy here we go again....blame CAL
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2301428)
Fortunately the system worked in this case. She had a breakdown, apparently precipitated by outside factors, but she didn't get to fly the airplane.
She should have never been allowed to board that aircraft. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2301429)
Yeah, kind of the same here. I have no tolerance for those who are belittling her, but she should have known better. Assuming she wasn't completely off the rails...who knows?
She'll either have to face disciplinary proceedings for her bad judgement, or claim mental health issues. The later would mean a long, and very likely permanent break from aviation courtesy of OKC. My guess is UAL will probably pull out all the stops to keep her off the line. My guess that she will never sit in the seat again. It's sad but most likely the reality she is facing. Reflecting on previous precedent at LUA I would guess they company will buy out the rest of her career at book rates and call it a day. Pest |
My guess is this incident and the media coverage it got will drive more companies to do the Delta shrink deal prior to hiring or tighten the Hogan parameters or both. If we have a German Wings type incident here in the US prepare for all hell to brake loose. I remember 20 years ago the interview question most asked was "what would you do if your captain showed up drunk?" Now it will be "what will you do if your captain goes bat **** crazy." Next question I have is who clears the FA's who come sit in the cockpit when one of the pilots goes to ****. What's going on in their lives. They stand or sit behind the remaining pilot in the cockpit.
|
Originally Posted by bottoms up
(Post 2301475)
She should have never been allowed to board that aircraft.
From what I've read, at the point she boarded the flight all that was known was that she had gotten confused about the van and report times and, once realized, rushed to the airport in the clothes that she was wearing. |
Originally Posted by Dave Fitzgerald
(Post 2301409)
I wouldn't be so sure. That's why we have a union to protect from management overreaction and to protect your rights as an employee. Don't be so quick to presume guilt.
Professional standards committee, EAP, and just plain normal counseling. Nothing wrong with any of those. The FAA endorses all of the above. Seems many here live in glass houses. :mad: I wasn't making a statement about what will happen it was my own opinion. I feel very bad for her on a personal level but professionally I have zero sympathy. Given Germanwings I don't want her near an airplane ever again. One of the things that few admit to but most think of is that we do have pilots on occasion that alpa should not protect. Nothing personal but reality. I also am of the understanding that once a pilot sets foot on airport or company property the EAP and or HIMS option is no longer applicable. Did she select the FFD? btw I only needed to watch the video to presume anything. Her own actions and behavior are pretty damning |
Originally Posted by Brainsurgeon
(Post 2301563)
My glass house is crystal clear....obviously yours is rose colored.
I wasn't making a statement about what will happen it was my own opinion. I feel very bad for her on a personal level but professionally I have zero sympathy. Given Germanwings I don't want her near an airplane ever again. One of the things that few admit to but most think of is that we do have pilots on occasion that alpa should not protect. Nothing personal but reality. I also am of the understanding that once a pilot sets foot on airport or company property the EAP and or HIMS option is no longer applicable. Did she select the FFD? btw I only needed to watch the video to presume anything. Her own actions and behavior are pretty damning |
Originally Posted by Slats Extend
(Post 2301571)
You have no clue about mental illness. And I hope you never find out.
None of us take joy in seeing a professional peer embarrass and hang themselves and their careers in front of pax and fellow crew members. It's unfortunate and not a fun trainwreck to watch. So what if some of us don't have a clue about mental illness? Are you saying that she just needs a little rehab and should be allowed back in the cockpit? Um......no. We're not electricians or chefs or even teachers that can go off the deep end and after some work with the shrink slip right back to our job. Doesn't work that way in this line of work. Nor should it. |
Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
(Post 2301577)
None of us take joy in seeing a professional peer embarrass and hang themselves and their careers in front of pax and fellow crew members. It's unfortunate and not a fun trainwreck to watch. So what if some of us don't have a clue about mental illness? Are you saying that she just needs a little rehab and should be allowed back in the cockpit?
Um......no. We're not electricians or chefs or even teachers that can go off the deep end and after some work with the shrink slip right back to our job. Doesn't work that way in this line of work. Nor should it. I'm not saying that at all. But you people that think a person with mental illness can check themselves with the FFD box in the ipad have no clue what its all about that is all. Until you have been point person to have to get someone like this help, quit trying to apply your clear and rational thinking to the situation. That is what I am saying. |
Originally Posted by Slats Extend
(Post 2301571)
You have no clue about mental illness. And I hope you never find out.
I only mentioned the FFD box as a point of fact that will be used and looked at. You're delusional if you think the lawyers won't pounce on that alone. You have your opinion and I have mine. I don't want her near an airplane ever again but I sincerely hope she gets the help she needs. The last thing we need is another Germanwings. |
Originally Posted by skypest
(Post 2301477)
My guess that she will never sit in the seat again. It's sad but most likely the reality she is facing. Reflecting on previous precedent at LUA I would guess they company will buy out the rest of her career at book rates and call it a day.
She's unlikely to pass another FAA medical. https://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets...m?newsId=20455 "Certain medical conditions such as a psychosis, bipolar disorder and severe personality disorder automatically disqualify a pilot from obtaining an FAA medical certificate and prohibit them from flying." Even if she was able to get an FAA medical, the insurance and PR issues would likely be too great to allow her to operate another commercial aircraft. |
Originally Posted by Brainsurgeon
(Post 2301591)
I have more of a clue, knowledge and insight than you assume. And further so what about it? The safety aspect alone demands more of our profession and for the company. I don't think a slap on the wrist or a couple of sessions with the shrink is going to fix some very deep emotional problems here. Not even going to speculate on the liability issues that would follow.
I only mentioned the FFD box as a point of fact that will be used and looked at. You're delusional if you think the lawyers won't pounce on that alone. You have your opinion and I have mine. I don't want her near an airplane ever again. You sure don't sound like you have a clue. I have never said or alluded an opinion on whether or not she should be back in the cockpit again. Nice deflection. I just calling BS on your blowhards pumping your chests about what she did on the video and trying to apply rational thinking to it. |
Originally Posted by Slats Extend
(Post 2301603)
You sure don't sound like you have a clue.
I have never said or alluded an opinion on whether or not she should be back in the cockpit again. Nice deflection. I just calling BS on your blowhards pumping your chests about what she did on the video and trying to apply rational thinking to it. |
Originally Posted by Brainsurgeon
(Post 2301611)
And I call BS to you snowflakes minimizing the severity of the incident and the potential ramifications. There is no other choice to apply rational thinking to her actions. Maybe you're just to dense to grasp that simple fact?
Nice try Brainsurgeon... lmao |
Originally Posted by Slats Extend
(Post 2301615)
Nice try Brainsurgeon... lmao
|
Originally Posted by Brainsurgeon
(Post 2301611)
And I call BS to you snowflakes minimizing the severity of the incident and the potential ramifications. There is no other choice to apply rational thinking to her actions. Maybe you're just to dense to grasp that simple fact?
I don't claim to know jacksquat about mental illness but I know it would be a PR nightmare if she were to fly for a commercial carrier in the future. Not going to happen. Just like the JetBlue pilot. |
Originally Posted by Brainsurgeon
(Post 2301620)
I figured it was to deep for you and I should've dumbed it down some more.
Actually it was my posts that went right over your head.:cool: Have a nice day. |
Originally Posted by Brainsurgeon
(Post 2301563)
I also am of the understanding that once a pilot sets foot on airport or company property the EAP and or HIMS option is no longer applicable.
|
Originally Posted by Lerxst
(Post 2301645)
Incorrect.
|
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 2301622)
While it was a fast moving situation, it ended pretty darned quickly. I'm sure that plane wouldn't have moved an inch; if you look at the video, there's an FA on the flight deck so both the FAs and FO were not going to let the plane move.
I don't claim to know jacksquat about mental illness but I know it would be a PR nightmare if she were to fly for a commercial carrier in the future. Not going to happen. Just like the JetBlue pilot. |
Speaking of public perception:
Y'all know this is a public forum, right? And anybody who has an internet connection can read this thread and witness how "professional" you are in your conversation and personal interaction, right? I've seen the video and read the article, and for the life of me I cannot find factual information that tells me about the conversation between the Captain and the gate agent before the Captain boarded the airplane. I don't know what the gate agent said, or what the gate agent asked, or how the Captain answered, or how she explained her casual attire. I don't know why she showed up late, or how she explained it to anyone before she got on the airplane. I don't know if anybody else knew or had any reason to know about the stresses in her personal life prior to her intercom announcement. There have been an awful lot of assumptions made about all that in this thread, and I think any one of us in her situation would not appreciate the assumptions and without doubt misinformation that has been created. What I do know for sure is that the video concludes with the PA announcement, "Flight attendants please DISARM doors, flight attendants DISARM doors, crosscheck, standby for ALL CALL." The system worked. Pilots are human, too. How would you want to be treated if it was you? . |
Brainsurgeon
Most pilots are caught after blowing into the machine , therefore they are at work, and at that point the statement comes out that they have a problem or their ALPA rep tells them to make that statement when they are called. Please don't post things you don't know about |
Originally Posted by Brainsurgeon
(Post 2301661)
Does that also apply to alcohol related incidents?
|
If it is determined that she is in need of help because she has depression, adjustment disorder or something similar she can utilize the services of the EAP program to get help.
If it is depression that she is battling there are four SSRI's that would allow a pilot to regain their first class medical but it will be a long long long long road. The pilot in question will meet with the EAP, then their AME. Next stop is an aviation psychiatrist, then likely a clinical psychiatrist. The clinical psychiatrist is the one that can prescribe medication if they believe it is needed. That individual will then spend lots of time talking to a counselor. Once they have shown that they are stable on a set dose of an SSRI for a minimum of 6 months they can begin the process of getting their medical back. Their counselor, clinical psychiatrist, aviation psychiatrist must recommend to the AME that they are ready to start the process. Next comes a cognitive screening test and if necessary further psychiatric review. If all of that comes back good they will will get a standard FAA Medical examination that will allow a HIMS AME to sponsor the pilot to the FAA to get their medical back. Their entire medical file is sent to Oak City for review. From there it is forwarded to Washington, DC for the final 5 levels of review. If granted a special issuance they will have regimented follow ups with everyone from the UAL EAP, their chief pilot, psychiatrist and AME. All told, if they choose to come back on an SSRI they will lose about 12 to 18 months before they will be flight deck qualified again. |
Originally Posted by Brainsurgeon
(Post 2301620)
I figured it was to deep for you and I should've dumbed it down some more.
So whether or not the FFD box gets checked really doesn't mean anything as there is no longer an ability to self assess. |
Originally Posted by 30west
(Post 2301683)
Brainsurgeon
Most pilots are caught after blowing into the machine , therefore they are at work, and at that point the statement comes out that they have a problem or their ALPA rep tells them to make that statement when they are called. Please don't post things you don't know about And no the examples of pilots getting caught that I know of and are public knowledge lately they were caught (suspected) long before the machine which only verified the suspicion. Define caught. Please don't post things you don't know about.
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets
(Post 2301703)
Slats is saying 1 thing and it's what I said earlier. You don't just wake up and say well damn iv lost my mind so let's not go to work today. If it's a true mental break there is no longer conscious decision making.
So whether or not the FFD box gets checked really doesn't mean anything as there is no longer an ability to self assess. |
Originally Posted by Brainsurgeon
(Post 2301719)
Did the phrase "it is my understanding" not make it clear to you that it was something I was not sure of? ... Please don't post things you don't know about. :confused: . |
Originally Posted by Slats Extend
(Post 2301579)
I'm not saying that at all. But you people that think a person with mental illness can check themselves with the FFD box in the ipad have no clue what its all about that is all.
Until you have been point person to have to get someone like this help, quit trying to apply your clear and rational thinking to the situation. That is what I am saying. |
Originally Posted by TonyC
(Post 2301680)
Speaking of public perception:
Y'all know this is a public forum, right? And anybody who has an internet connection can read this thread and witness how "professional" you are in your conversation and personal interaction, right? I've seen the video and read the article, and for the life of me I cannot find factual information that tells me about the conversation between the Captain and the gate agent before the Captain boarded the airplane. I don't know what the gate agent said, or what the gate agent asked, or how the Captain answered, or how she explained her casual attire. I don't know why she showed up late, or how she explained it to anyone before she got on the airplane. I don't know if anybody else knew or had any reason to know about the stresses in her personal life prior to her intercom announcement. There have been an awful lot of assumptions made about all that in this thread, and I think any one of us in her situation would not appreciate the assumptions and without doubt misinformation that has been created. What I do know for sure is that the video concludes with the PA announcement, "Flight attendants please DISARM doors, flight attendants DISARM doors, crosscheck, standby for ALL CALL." The system worked. Pilots are human, too. How would you want to be treated if it was you? . Give it a rest please. |
I have seen the video and it is an unfortunate situation that she showed up to work in that condition. Most pilots would know if they are not in the state of mind to fly when faced with a bad event that occurred in their personal life.. What concerns me about her, is that she choose to come to work in a very bad state of mind. I also think this event will be the straw that broke the camels back, and all pilots will be required to pass a psych evaluation in the near future.
|
Originally Posted by Brainsurgeon
(Post 2301661)
Thank you for the correction I didn't know that. Does that also apply to alcohol related incidents?
|
Originally Posted by 3 green
(Post 2301880)
I have seen the video and it is an unfortunate situation that she showed up to work in that condition. Most pilots would know if they are not in the state of mind to fly when faced with a bad event that occurred in their personal life.. What concerns me about her, is that she choose to come to work in a very bad state of mind. I also think this event will be the straw that broke the camels back, and all pilots will be required to pass a psych evaluation in the near future.
Here's a novel idea. Allow the union earn it's 1.95% and everyone keep their fingers away from the keyboard. If it's wise advice for the Orange Man on 1600 Pennsylvania, it's just gotta be for Mensa candidates like us. |
Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
(Post 2301577)
None of us take joy in seeing a professional peer embarrass and hang themselves and their careers in front of pax and fellow crew members. It's unfortunate and not a fun trainwreck to watch. So what if some of us don't have a clue about mental illness? Are you saying that she just needs a little rehab and should be allowed back in the cockpit?
Um......no. We're not electricians or chefs or even teachers that can go off the deep end and after some work with the shrink slip right back to our job. Doesn't work that way in this line of work. Nor should it. Did the astronaut diaper pilot get her wings back? Did the mentally unhinged JetBlue pilot who the undoubtedly terrified FO had to lock out of the cockpit get his? I hope not. I truly hope all of these people get treatment and find peace, but who could argue that someone whose sanity depends on them properly taking their meds that day should be in command of anyone's life, let alone hundreds of lives? They shouldn't be allowed to be doctors, they shouldn't be allowed to be judges, and they should not be allowed to be airline pilots. I know this isn't politically correct, but not EVERYONE should ALWAYS be allowed to do EVERYTHING. To unquestionably think otherwise is, in a word, insane. |
Originally Posted by Winston
(Post 2301924)
This, and thank you for it.
Did the astronaut diaper pilot get her wings back? Did the mentally unhinged JetBlue pilot who the undoubtedly terrified FO had to lock out of the cockpit get his? I hope not. I truly hope all of these people get treatment and find peace, but who could argue that someone whose sanity depends on them properly taking their meds that day should be in command of anyone's life, let alone hundreds of lives? They shouldn't be allowed to be doctors, they shouldn't be allowed to be judges, and they should not be allowed to be airline pilots. I know this isn't politically correct, but not EVERYONE should ALWAYS be allowed to do EVERYTHING. To unquestionably think otherwise is, in a word, insane. I've found the discussion on this incident to be rather tame for pilots; not sure why some are so sensitive on the topic. If anything, this is a big reason to have LTD insurance. |
They have a choice! LTD or TK. The best of the best end up as instructors.
|
Originally Posted by Yak02
(Post 2301985)
They have a choice! LTD or TK. The best of the best end up as instructors.
You've got to have a first class medical and maintain flying status to be an instructor. The friends of Fred, no medical, over age 65 crowd is long gone. You could be an FTI without a medical. But it pays less than most pilots would make on LTD. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:25 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands