UPS short of pilots
#11
How is what RickyBobby said any different from what you just said?
Looks like you're agreeing with him/her and yet you're saying "that's the problem with our group.."??
Yes, staff us correctly and follow the contract (did he/she disagree with that premise?) but what's wrong with an LOA that'd benefit every IPA member? What exactly are you saying?
#12
Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
It should benefit the entire group.
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,339
IF the company and the union decide on some kind of LOA where they pay 150% for picking up OT trips it'd benefit IPA as a group because everyone CAN pick up OT if they want to.
I cherish my off time but if someone decides to work extra why would that be detrimental to me? Would you rather see an IPA brother or sister fly the goods or for it to be flown by a supply-chain-solutions pilot who probably lives in the parking lot of Guangzhou airport?
Sure, a pay raise for all would be fantastic but personally I'd prefer more vacation, we all have different preferences. This is just such an example.
I view every improvement that's AVAILABLE to IPA membership as an improvement for the entire group. If I'm wrong please educate me. I'm truly surprised by nightrider's reply to RB...
#14
I cherish my off time but if someone decides to work extra why would that be detrimental to me? Would you rather see an IPA brother or sister fly the goods or for it to be flown by a supply-chain-solutions pilot who probably lives in the parking lot of Guangzhou airport?
As far as SCS flying, if you believe LP, most of it is actually on brown tails.
BoilerUp,
Since the CP hotline said the flying would be incorporated into the 05 bid pack, how about anything above 80 hours would be paid at 150% OT or not. That way, when the company jams the lines, the pilots who don't want to fly extra get paid for the forced OT and the ones who chose to pick up, also get paid.
#15
I currently don't pick up OT/JA. The pot just isn't sweet enough. Start paying all OT above guarantee and at 150% and JAs at 200% and suddenly it becomes worth it. I get that we want to be staffed properly but incentives for picking up OT would certainly not be something unique to UPS. With the way the industry is going, I have my doubts as to whether we'll ever be correctly staffed. Might as well codify some benefits from the situation.
#16
It is cheaper for the company to pay overtime (up to 150% or so) rather than hire more. We are on one of the few companies that does not offer premium for picking up overtime.
I would like to see all OT paid, regardless of line credit, then 150% above 75, then 200% above 85 (or JA.)
I would like to see all OT paid, regardless of line credit, then 150% above 75, then 200% above 85 (or JA.)
#17
This banter is fine, but remember that there is already a contractual provision to pay all open time above guarantee. They CHOSE not to invoke this language that FFTF pointed out earlier ...
They chose to ignore a valid CBA section that would benefit some of the low-time line holders and might alleviate some of the staffing short-comings.
They chose to come directly to the pilots.
They probably chose to ignore the warnings from our EB about the impending manpower shortage.
For those who've yet to memorize C2016, 13.K.11:
The Company may in its discretion on a bid or pay period basis waive the criteria set forth in paragraph 7 above and specify that all open time will be paid above guarantee. The waiver may be fleet/seat/domicile specific and further may be by category of line (e.g. RMUL, EDW, EDW turn etc.). The Company will provide notice to crewmembers prior to the beginning of any bid period in which paragraph 7 will be waived and detail the extent of the waiver.
The Company may in its discretion on a bid or pay period basis waive the criteria set forth in paragraph 7 above and specify that all open time will be paid above guarantee. The waiver may be fleet/seat/domicile specific and further may be by category of line (e.g. RMUL, EDW, EDW turn etc.). The Company will provide notice to crewmembers prior to the beginning of any bid period in which paragraph 7 will be waived and detail the extent of the waiver.
They chose to come directly to the pilots.
They probably chose to ignore the warnings from our EB about the impending manpower shortage.
#18
My point is simple, if you start cutting deals with the opentime *****s, who by the way don't need any extra motivation, we will stay at the same understaffed, ****ty condition we have been in for the almost 2 decades that I have been here. Stay home on your days off and they will increase staffing and have many more upgrades. If you do the extra work then they will staff much lower and many more will stay fo's for much longer! Sometimes we are our own worst enemies. Remember this they won't use increased opentime pickup to cover the shortage, they will try to count on it and completely quit hiring and run us understaffed again, counting on the pilots to cover the slack, just stay home and see what happens.
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: DC-8 756/767
Posts: 1,144
My point is simple, if you start cutting deals with the opentime *****s, who by the way don't need any extra motivation, we will stay at the same understaffed, ****ty condition we have been in for the almost 2 decades that I have been here. Stay home on your days off and they will increase staffing and have many more upgrades. If you do the extra work then they will staff much lower and many more will stay fo's for much longer! Sometimes we are our own worst enemies. Remember this they won't use increased opentime pickup to cover the shortage, they will try to count on it and completely quit hiring and run us understaffed again, counting on the pilots to cover the slack, just stay home and see what happens.
#20
Individually it doesn't necessarily hurt us. But the practice does hurt us as a union, especially in negotiations (which is nearly all the time). Its hard to ask for more, when the company can prove we are satisfied with what is currently in the CBA.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post