Oct new hires
09-18-2021 | 09:11 AM
#11
Thread Starter
maxing the min/Moderator
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 21
From: 757
09-18-2021 | 04:52 PM
#14
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 990
Likes: 38
09-18-2021 | 06:14 PM
#15
Doing One Pilot's Job
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,891
Likes: 130
Not exactly.
Per 14.E.10, vacancies generated by a bid have to be filled within 18 months or they expire. Vacancies that remain aren't obligated to be made available on a subsequent bid; they still exist alongside vacancies generated by a subsequent bid.
Bottom line: basic math says a vacancy bid is coming soon if hiring is to continue as rumored, but not necessarily required prior to an October class.
Per 14.E.10, vacancies generated by a bid have to be filled within 18 months or they expire. Vacancies that remain aren't obligated to be made available on a subsequent bid; they still exist alongside vacancies generated by a subsequent bid.
Bottom line: basic math says a vacancy bid is coming soon if hiring is to continue as rumored, but not necessarily required prior to an October class.
09-18-2021 | 07:09 PM
#16
Living the SloBus life
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,178
Likes: 92
Not exactly.
Per 14.E.10, vacancies generated by a bid have to be filled within 18 months or they expire. Vacancies that remain aren't obligated to be made available on a subsequent bid; they still exist alongside vacancies generated by a subsequent bid.
Bottom line: basic math says a vacancy bid is coming soon if hiring is to continue as rumored, but not necessarily required prior to an October class.
Per 14.E.10, vacancies generated by a bid have to be filled within 18 months or they expire. Vacancies that remain aren't obligated to be made available on a subsequent bid; they still exist alongside vacancies generated by a subsequent bid.
Bottom line: basic math says a vacancy bid is coming soon if hiring is to continue as rumored, but not necessarily required prior to an October class.
09-19-2021 | 04:16 PM
#17
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 244
Likes: 19
From: MD-11 Guru
It's a big deal, and an At-Large tracked it in the past. UPS arbitrarily adding crewmembers to the bottom of the F/S/D that is short is a trick they have pulled in the past and we have language to support that those positions will be made available to seniority crewmembers before they are assigned to new hires. I think we are entitled to have a scorecard of that information available, at least on the secure IPA website.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
