Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   UPS (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/ups/)
-   -   A350F (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/ups/135703-a350f.html)

jetlaggy 11-15-2021 05:22 AM

A350F
 
https://www.reuters.com/business/aer...ow-2021-11-14/

Air Lease is expected to be among early customers for a long-haul A350 freighter alongside an unspecified cargo firm, industry publication The Air Current reported.

Riverside 11-15-2021 07:22 AM

Where you going to park it?

flyguy23 11-15-2021 08:09 AM


Originally Posted by Riverside (Post 3322942)
Where you going to park it?

Im 100% certain UPS will order this airplane and 3 months before first delivery, they’ll be extremely surprised they don’t have anywhere to park it.

spanners70 11-15-2021 08:31 AM

Will be Dhl, operated by European air transport from leipzig/Germany….

tnkrdrvr 11-15-2021 09:10 AM


Originally Posted by Riverside (Post 3322942)
Where you going to park it?

No idea if it will be the A350, converted 777s, or something else to replace the MD11. What I am sure of is that there is nothing available that can replace an MD that has the same ramp footprint. Both UPS and FedEx will have to repaint their ramps and perhaps pour some concrete. The only other option is to use a couple of 76s to replace each MD11 which would also drive a need for more concrete. I’m very skeptical that UPS is the unnamed logistics company in the article.

Precontact 11-15-2021 10:52 AM

I agree about us not being an early A350F operator. I see FedEx selecting some 777X freighters if they are indeed offered. I can see UPS getting more 767s.

CardboardCutout 11-15-2021 01:16 PM


Originally Posted by flyguy23 (Post 3322970)
Im 100% certain UPS will order this airplane and 3 months before first delivery, they’ll be extremely surprised they don’t have anywhere to park it.

Lol. Funny because true.

But seriously folks, I don't think brand new shiny Airbusii is in keeping with "sweating the assets", however "discounted" the pricetag. Few hundred million here, few hundred million there, eventually it buys a lot of gas, and there are tons of -400s just languishing in the boneyard...

jetlaggy 11-16-2021 06:11 AM

https://www.flightglobal.com/safety/...146419.article

tnkrdrvr 11-16-2021 11:26 AM

Yippee! Just what we all want:mad:. 109t seems a bit light on the payload.

BoilerUP 11-17-2021 02:50 AM

109 metric tons is 240k lbs…more than a 777F.

tnkrdrvr 11-17-2021 03:58 PM


Originally Posted by BoilerUP (Post 3323864)
109 metric tons is 240k lbs…more than a 777F.

Yes, but how far can it go with that load? Will it need a tech stop in KIX when flying from HKG/SZX to ANC? I haven’t seen those numbers yet. The other number that bears watching is the cost differential between a 777P2F and the A350F. Either way, the parking plan has to change.

BoilerUP 11-17-2021 04:07 PM

A350F
 

Originally Posted by tnkrdrvr (Post 3324222)
Yes, but how far can it go with that load?

The Google sez A350F is spec’d at 4700nm range with 109 metric tons max payload.

For comparison, 777F is 4880nm @ 104.5 metric tons max payload and the 777-300ERSF is 4650nm @ 100.7 metric tons max payload.

HPIC 11-17-2021 04:52 PM


Originally Posted by BoilerUP (Post 3323864)
109 metric tons is 240k lbs…more than a 777F.

Yep. 777F has 105-106 metric ton payload capability until MZFW. About another 100T of fuel puts it at ramp weight.

tnkrdrvr 11-19-2021 03:13 PM


Originally Posted by BoilerUP (Post 3324233)
The Google sez A350F is spec’d at 4700nm range with 109 metric tons max payload.

For comparison, 777F is 4880nm @ 104.5 metric tons max payload and the 777-300ERSF is 4650nm @ 100.7 metric tons max payload.

Why would I Google it when I can ask you?:D

Appreciate the info. I strongly doubt we are launch customer unless they offered a beyond screaming good deal.

C17B74 11-21-2021 01:27 PM


Originally Posted by tnkrdrvr (Post 3325048)
Why would I Google it when I can ask you?:D

Appreciate the info. I strongly doubt we are launch customer unless they offered a beyond screaming good deal.

All Good Stuff. 777 was tabled by Boeing to this customer and they went with the 350 anyway. Agree it probably wasn’t Purple, although like Cathay and another European outfit Fred has been a major if not one of the largest contributors for less to no pilots up front technology. Will no doubt take time, but the hunt is on like Donkey Kong with more and more interested parties and both manufacturers showcasing developments. Regulatory hurdles will slow the process some.

Flybynight101 11-24-2021 05:14 PM

I always laugh when people say UPS will never get XXX or XXX cause of ramp space on the wings. Did anyone see how many Atlas 747’s we’re parked on ramp 6 this week? Lol.

MX recently told me there is enough room on Ramp 6 alone for 8 74s.

C17B74 11-24-2021 10:27 PM


Originally Posted by Flybynight101 (Post 3326940)
I always laugh when people say UPS will never get XXX or XXX cause of ramp space on the wings. Did anyone see how many Atlas 747’s we’re parked on ramp 6 this week? Lol.

MX recently told me there is enough room on Ramp 6 alone for 8 74s.

Excellent, you have plenty of -8’s with a few more coming on line quickly followed by the Final 4 Atlas birds near the end of 2022. Definitely will be able to prove Ramp 6 capability in the near future.

vprof 11-25-2021 12:02 AM


Originally Posted by Flybynight101 (Post 3326940)
I always laugh when people say UPS will never get XXX or XXX cause of ramp space on the wings. Did anyone see how many Atlas 747’s we’re parked on ramp 6 this week? Lol.

MX recently told me there is enough room on Ramp 6 alone for 8 74s.


Also, people don’t realize that UPS once had 10 orders and 10 options for the A380F.
It wasn’t until Airbus kept delaying the deliveries that UPS finally CNXed them.

flyguy23 11-25-2021 05:17 AM


Originally Posted by vprof (Post 3327008)
Also, people don’t realize that UPS once had 10 orders and 10 options for the A380F.
It wasn’t until Airbus kept delaying the deliveries that UPS finally CNXed them.


I think people question the ramp space when talking about replacing 40ish MDs vs adding a few 74s for peak. Those MDs are littered all over the wings, which obviously doesn’t work with just about any replacement.

Flybynight101 11-25-2021 01:14 PM

Well I guess we’re screwed. There’s zero options then. I guess we’ll just keep the MD11 forever… lol

Again, I just laugh that people are 100% convinced that “nothing will fit in the wings…” therefore there are zero options…

Learn to be…

BoilerUP 11-25-2021 02:08 PM

Location of the main deck door might be as big a factor in what airframes “fit on the wings” in SDF as wingspan.

flyguy23 11-25-2021 02:21 PM


Originally Posted by Flybynight101 (Post 3327200)
Well I guess we’re screwed. There’s zero options then. I guess we’ll just keep the MD11 forever… lol

Again, I just laugh that people are 100% convinced that “nothing will fit in the wings…” therefore there are zero options…

Learn to be…


Theres the 76, which may just be the plan.

NotMrNiceGuy 11-25-2021 07:37 PM


Originally Posted by flyguy23 (Post 3327212)
Theres the 76, which may just be the plan.

Until 2028…

tnkrdrvr 11-26-2021 07:37 AM


Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy (Post 3327280)
Until 2028…

I think that will only impact new off the assembly line aircraft, not pax to freight conversion. It will be interesting to see how that impacts purchases going forward.

cougar 11-26-2021 12:04 PM

A good summary of the freighter issues going forward. I'm still suspect of the A350 claimed performance, Airbus never could make the A380 work. Probably smart to wait and see. Based on previous freighter history, the 777X Freighter will likely be more capable. With the 747-8 ending production, the only new freighters that meet the ICAO CO2 emission standards are the A350 and 777X, and both are only a design proposal currently (777X highly probable). It's an interesting problem.

https://leehamnews.com/2021/04/06/bo...ce-threatened/

tnkrdrvr 11-26-2021 01:43 PM


Originally Posted by cougar (Post 3327466)
A good summary of the freighter issues going forward. I'm still suspect of the A350 claimed performance, Airbus never could make the A380 work. Probably smart to wait and see. Based on previous freighter history, the 777X Freighter will likely be more capable. With the 747-8 ending production, the only new freighters that meet the ICAO CO2 emission standards are the A350 and 777X, and both are only a design proposal currently (777X highly probable). It's an interesting problem.

https://leehamnews.com/2021/04/06/bo...ce-threatened/

Which begs the interesting question of what will fill the niche currently occupied by the 76 freighter. UPS, FedEx, and ACMI companies will need something more than just a a350 or 777X. Perhaps a 78 freighter?

threeighteen 11-27-2021 01:33 AM


Originally Posted by tnkrdrvr (Post 3327499)
Which begs the interesting question of what will fill the niche currently occupied by the 76 freighter. UPS, FedEx, and ACMI companies will need something more than just a a350 or 777X. Perhaps a 78 freighter?

A330 NEO Freighter or 787 Freighter.

767pilot 11-28-2021 02:17 PM

The airplane of the future might be the 767

767pilot 11-28-2021 02:19 PM

Duplicate mesaage

threeighteen 11-28-2021 03:18 PM


Originally Posted by 767pilot (Post 3328239)
The airplane of the future might be the 767

Only a few production years left unless they launch a NEO.

C17B74 11-28-2021 04:04 PM


Originally Posted by 767pilot (Post 3328239)
The airplane of the future might be the 767

Definitely agree for the foreseeable future by sheer numbers on the line everywhere and the numbers still left to be delivered (not including conversions) the 76 will be the predominant force. Of course there will be new platforms introduced but it will take a decade to infiltrate the current investments with any major impact.

cougar 11-30-2021 08:50 PM

Qatar CEO has publicly stated the need for new freighters. Qatar operates the passenger version A350 currently but several grounded. CEO closed the door on the A350F today per the article. Looking at up to 50 777X Freighter airplanes. It doesn’t bode well for the A350F if current operators of 350 don’t want the airplane. Again, it’s one articles opinion.

https://www.airlineratings.com/news/...7x-freighters/

C2078 12-01-2021 06:45 AM


Originally Posted by cougar (Post 3329367)
Qatar CEO has publicly stated the need for new freighters. Qatar operates the passenger version A350 currently but several grounded. CEO closed the door on the A350F today per the article. Looking at up to 50 777X Freighter airplanes. It doesn’t bode well for the A350F if current operators of 350 don’t want the airplane. Again, it’s one articles opinion.

https://www.airlineratings.com/news/...7x-freighters/

If current operators don’t want the A350 then UPS will probably go with opposite flow and buy them 🤪.

tnkrdrvr 12-01-2021 07:18 AM


Originally Posted by C2078 (Post 3329483)
If current operators don’t want the A350 then UPS will probably go with opposite flow and buy them 🤪.

This may be more true than we’d like. The less demand for the 350f the lower the price UPS could negotiate. I still think a converted 777 is more likely, but who knows. We could still be flying MDs in 15 years, when I will cease caring.

Tango Uniform 12-01-2021 07:55 AM


Originally Posted by C2078 (Post 3329483)
If current operators don’t want the A350 then UPS will probably go with opposite flow and buy them 🤪.

Just like UPS did with launching the 75 and 76pf. How long did it take the world to catch up on that one?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:28 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands