![]() |
A350F
https://www.reuters.com/business/aer...ow-2021-11-14/
Air Lease is expected to be among early customers for a long-haul A350 freighter alongside an unspecified cargo firm, industry publication The Air Current reported. |
Where you going to park it?
|
Originally Posted by Riverside
(Post 3322942)
Where you going to park it?
|
Will be Dhl, operated by European air transport from leipzig/Germany….
|
Originally Posted by Riverside
(Post 3322942)
Where you going to park it?
|
I agree about us not being an early A350F operator. I see FedEx selecting some 777X freighters if they are indeed offered. I can see UPS getting more 767s.
|
Originally Posted by flyguy23
(Post 3322970)
Im 100% certain UPS will order this airplane and 3 months before first delivery, they’ll be extremely surprised they don’t have anywhere to park it.
But seriously folks, I don't think brand new shiny Airbusii is in keeping with "sweating the assets", however "discounted" the pricetag. Few hundred million here, few hundred million there, eventually it buys a lot of gas, and there are tons of -400s just languishing in the boneyard... |
|
Yippee! Just what we all want:mad:. 109t seems a bit light on the payload.
|
109 metric tons is 240k lbs…more than a 777F.
|
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 3323864)
109 metric tons is 240k lbs…more than a 777F.
|
A350F
Originally Posted by tnkrdrvr
(Post 3324222)
Yes, but how far can it go with that load?
For comparison, 777F is 4880nm @ 104.5 metric tons max payload and the 777-300ERSF is 4650nm @ 100.7 metric tons max payload. |
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 3323864)
109 metric tons is 240k lbs…more than a 777F.
|
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 3324233)
The Google sez A350F is spec’d at 4700nm range with 109 metric tons max payload.
For comparison, 777F is 4880nm @ 104.5 metric tons max payload and the 777-300ERSF is 4650nm @ 100.7 metric tons max payload. Appreciate the info. I strongly doubt we are launch customer unless they offered a beyond screaming good deal. |
Originally Posted by tnkrdrvr
(Post 3325048)
Why would I Google it when I can ask you?:D
Appreciate the info. I strongly doubt we are launch customer unless they offered a beyond screaming good deal. |
I always laugh when people say UPS will never get XXX or XXX cause of ramp space on the wings. Did anyone see how many Atlas 747’s we’re parked on ramp 6 this week? Lol.
MX recently told me there is enough room on Ramp 6 alone for 8 74s. |
Originally Posted by Flybynight101
(Post 3326940)
I always laugh when people say UPS will never get XXX or XXX cause of ramp space on the wings. Did anyone see how many Atlas 747’s we’re parked on ramp 6 this week? Lol.
MX recently told me there is enough room on Ramp 6 alone for 8 74s. |
Originally Posted by Flybynight101
(Post 3326940)
I always laugh when people say UPS will never get XXX or XXX cause of ramp space on the wings. Did anyone see how many Atlas 747’s we’re parked on ramp 6 this week? Lol.
MX recently told me there is enough room on Ramp 6 alone for 8 74s. Also, people don’t realize that UPS once had 10 orders and 10 options for the A380F. It wasn’t until Airbus kept delaying the deliveries that UPS finally CNXed them. |
Originally Posted by vprof
(Post 3327008)
Also, people don’t realize that UPS once had 10 orders and 10 options for the A380F.
It wasn’t until Airbus kept delaying the deliveries that UPS finally CNXed them. I think people question the ramp space when talking about replacing 40ish MDs vs adding a few 74s for peak. Those MDs are littered all over the wings, which obviously doesn’t work with just about any replacement. |
Well I guess we’re screwed. There’s zero options then. I guess we’ll just keep the MD11 forever… lol
Again, I just laugh that people are 100% convinced that “nothing will fit in the wings…” therefore there are zero options… Learn to be… |
Location of the main deck door might be as big a factor in what airframes “fit on the wings” in SDF as wingspan.
|
Originally Posted by Flybynight101
(Post 3327200)
Well I guess we’re screwed. There’s zero options then. I guess we’ll just keep the MD11 forever… lol
Again, I just laugh that people are 100% convinced that “nothing will fit in the wings…” therefore there are zero options… Learn to be… Theres the 76, which may just be the plan. |
Originally Posted by flyguy23
(Post 3327212)
Theres the 76, which may just be the plan.
|
Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
(Post 3327280)
Until 2028…
|
A good summary of the freighter issues going forward. I'm still suspect of the A350 claimed performance, Airbus never could make the A380 work. Probably smart to wait and see. Based on previous freighter history, the 777X Freighter will likely be more capable. With the 747-8 ending production, the only new freighters that meet the ICAO CO2 emission standards are the A350 and 777X, and both are only a design proposal currently (777X highly probable). It's an interesting problem.
https://leehamnews.com/2021/04/06/bo...ce-threatened/ |
Originally Posted by cougar
(Post 3327466)
A good summary of the freighter issues going forward. I'm still suspect of the A350 claimed performance, Airbus never could make the A380 work. Probably smart to wait and see. Based on previous freighter history, the 777X Freighter will likely be more capable. With the 747-8 ending production, the only new freighters that meet the ICAO CO2 emission standards are the A350 and 777X, and both are only a design proposal currently (777X highly probable). It's an interesting problem.
https://leehamnews.com/2021/04/06/bo...ce-threatened/ |
Originally Posted by tnkrdrvr
(Post 3327499)
Which begs the interesting question of what will fill the niche currently occupied by the 76 freighter. UPS, FedEx, and ACMI companies will need something more than just a a350 or 777X. Perhaps a 78 freighter?
|
The airplane of the future might be the 767
|
Duplicate mesaage
|
Originally Posted by 767pilot
(Post 3328239)
The airplane of the future might be the 767
|
Originally Posted by 767pilot
(Post 3328239)
The airplane of the future might be the 767
|
Qatar CEO has publicly stated the need for new freighters. Qatar operates the passenger version A350 currently but several grounded. CEO closed the door on the A350F today per the article. Looking at up to 50 777X Freighter airplanes. It doesn’t bode well for the A350F if current operators of 350 don’t want the airplane. Again, it’s one articles opinion.
https://www.airlineratings.com/news/...7x-freighters/ |
Originally Posted by cougar
(Post 3329367)
Qatar CEO has publicly stated the need for new freighters. Qatar operates the passenger version A350 currently but several grounded. CEO closed the door on the A350F today per the article. Looking at up to 50 777X Freighter airplanes. It doesn’t bode well for the A350F if current operators of 350 don’t want the airplane. Again, it’s one articles opinion.
https://www.airlineratings.com/news/...7x-freighters/ |
Originally Posted by C2078
(Post 3329483)
If current operators don’t want the A350 then UPS will probably go with opposite flow and buy them 🤪.
|
Originally Posted by C2078
(Post 3329483)
If current operators don’t want the A350 then UPS will probably go with opposite flow and buy them 🤪.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:28 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands