![]() |
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 4025084)
With both extensions, we'd need 24.25% at DOS to match DAL/UAL Jan 2027 rates. Compared to the ginormous percentage of FDX's DOS rate increase, that provides a lot of relative "pie" on a per-pilot basis to devote toward other articles, including scheduling.
We need to aim higher. |
Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
(Post 4025963)
I hope we are not planning on matching Delta as they have already exchanged openers for their next contract.
We need to aim higher. |
Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
(Post 4025963)
I hope we are not planning on matching Delta as they have already exchanged openers for their next contract.
We need to aim higher. |
Originally Posted by Grease
(Post 4025969)
We will definitely have to aim higher, because the bar will be reset in short order.
Fuel costs have moved higher again, some airlines are already trimming growth, and there’s more focus on protecting margins than expanding at all costs. That’s happening now, not hypothetically. At the same time, they’re carrying significantly higher fixed labor costs from the last round of deals, which were negotiated during one of the strongest demand environments the industry has ever seen. Demand still looks solid, but the landscape is clearly shifting from expansion toward cost control. Personally, I think expecting another quick cycle of outsized gains like we saw post-COVID is optimistic. The current environment looks materially different than the one that produced those contracts. |
Originally Posted by ramp9
(Post 4026132)
What makes you think the legacies are walking into the same environment that produced the last round of contracts?
Fuel costs have moved higher again, some airlines are already trimming growth, and there’s more focus on protecting margins than expanding at all costs. That’s happening now, not hypothetically. At the same time, they’re carrying significantly higher fixed labor costs from the last round of deals, which were negotiated during one of the strongest demand environments the industry has ever seen. Demand still looks solid, but the landscape is clearly shifting from expansion toward cost control. Personally, I think expecting another quick cycle of outsized gains like we saw post-COVID is optimistic. The current environment looks materially different than the one that produced those contracts. |
Originally Posted by ramp9
(Post 4026132)
Personally, I think expecting another quick cycle of outsized gains like we saw post-COVID is optimistic. The current environment looks materially different than the one that produced those contracts.
|
Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
(Post 4026857)
I don’t think it will be an outsized gain like last time. It doesn’t have to be though. A 10% raise at DOS would put them at $548 for the top rate and go from there.
|
Originally Posted by ramp9
(Post 4026132)
What makes you think the legacies are walking into the same environment that produced the last round of contracts?
Fuel costs have moved higher again, some airlines are already trimming growth, and there’s more focus on protecting margins than expanding at all costs. That’s happening now, not hypothetically. At the same time, they’re carrying significantly higher fixed labor costs from the last round of deals, which were negotiated during one of the strongest demand environments the industry has ever seen. Demand still looks solid, but the landscape is clearly shifting from expansion toward cost control. Personally, I think expecting another quick cycle of outsized gains like we saw post-COVID is optimistic. The current environment looks materially different than the one that produced those contracts. |
Originally Posted by Lowslung
(Post 4027025)
Well, they ain’t going backwards. We clearly need to be aiming at legacy pay rates plus some percentage in order to maintain competitiveness. A snap up clause would be great, but I don’t have my hopes up as FedEx failed to secure one. Of course, that’s all before we even talk about trip trades, trip change premiums, minimizing circadian shifts, adding 117 equivalent protections, a retirement bump, cash over cap, etc. You get the idea…it’s a long list, and while we certainly won’t get all of it, it’s going to take a solid 90% of what I just mentioned and then some to earn my yes vote. Make no mistake; for a whole lot of us ‘newer than 2014’ folk, this contract is going to have to be fairly epic for us to vote it in. “Best we could negotiate” and “there’s only so big a slice of the pie” excuses won’t cut it this time around.
|
Originally Posted by tnkrdrvr
(Post 4027039)
As a post 2014 hire, I agree that patience is wearing thin with many aspects of this job. Mediocre, at best, hotels, lagging pay (relative to legacies, inflation, and soon FedEx), lagging pension (relative to both inflation and now FedEx), 15 yr instead of 12 yr pay tables, no cash over cap, miserably lagging line construction, lagging trip trade system, lagging Reserve rules, lagging reschedule protections, and a worn out fleet. Obviously, some things are completely out of the EB’s and NC’s hands, but some things are their job to obtain for us at the negotiating table.
Everything is compounded by the treatment we receive from QA, crew scheduling, etc… The scheduling department is run worse than a regional or ACMI… |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:31 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands