![]() |
Angle of Attack - Vimeo
More HD video.
This one highlights the first time carrier qualification of students from VT-21, flying the T-45s from NAS Kingsville. FlyBoyd - you might have recognized some of the students! Angle of Attack - Excerpt 1 |
Very, very cool. Makes you want to become a Naval/Marine Aviator all over again. What is the average flight time when these younglings fling themselves onto a carrier deck?
|
Very good vid.
Which boat was this? And why didnt the LSO tell him the hook was not down? regards |
Originally Posted by brianb
(Post 1475672)
Very, very cool. Makes you want to become a Naval/Marine Aviator all over again. What is the average flight time when these younglings fling themselves onto a carrier deck?
Now that they only go to the boat ONCE before getting their wings - the numbers should be higher because they will have gone through different/additional phases of training prior to the first try at CQ (the LTjg mentions the strike det at El Centro for example) Any prior VT IPs at Meridian or Kingsville care to chime in here with the recent numbers an SNA would go to CQ? |
Originally Posted by oicur12
(Post 1475678)
Very good vid.
Which boat was this? And why didnt the LSO tell him the hook was not down? regards At least the part filmed at 4+23 is on the USS Nimitz (CVN-68). You can see it to the left of the screen as the airplane comes to a stop. Good question about the LSO not telling a guy/gal their hook isn't down. I know it happens:D I notice at time 3+45 that the hook isn't down and the AoA indicator is steady. In my former airplane, with the switches set appropriately, if the hook wasn't down (for instance a purposeful hook up pass) the AoA indicator will blink. If I remember my time on the platform too - there is a guy with binos looking at each airplane at the 180 deg position and relaying the configuration of the aircraft. On one personal note - the young Marine mentions around 5+40 that the "cockiness came out" on the second day. I can relate. On the second day of my TA-4J CQ period I was feeling *salty* and ended up throwing a Wave-off in the groove pass on my second to last attempt. That is a 1.0 GPA pass if I remember correctly (back me up here any LSOs). Dropped my CQ GPA from 'doing pretty good' to 'whew - glad I didn't mess up twice'! |
Angle of Attack - Vimeo
Not being a military guy, I think that was awesome , thanks for sharing
|
usmcflyer
thanks for the reply. Do they use regular boats for training these days? I thought they used a specific boat like the forrestal or lex in the old days. |
Originally Posted by oicur12
(Post 1475814)
usmcflyer
thanks for the reply. Do they use regular boats for training these days? I thought they used a specific boat like the forrestal or lex in the old days. For many years it was the USS Lexington. From Wiki: Into 1969, Lexington operated out of her home port, Pensacola, as well as Corpus Christi and New Orleans, qualifying student aviators and maintaining the high state of training of both active duty and reserve naval aviators. Her work became of increasing significance as she prepared the men vital to the Navy and Marine Corps operations over Vietnam, where naval aviation played a major role. Lexington marked her 200,000th arrested landing on 17 October 1967, and was redesignated CVT-16 on 1 January 1969. She continued as a training carrier for the next 22 years until decommissioned and struck on 8 November 1991. On 29 October 1989, a student Naval Aviator lost control of his T-2 training aircraft after an aborted attempt to land on Lexington's flight deck. The aircraft impacted the island with its right wing, killing 5 crew members (including the pilot of the plane), and another 15 were injured. The island suffered no major damage, and fires from the burning fuel were extinguished within 15 minutes.[11][12] Lexington was the final Essex-class carrier in commission, after USS Oriskany (CV-34) had been decommissioned in 1976 They retired her and the USS Forrestal came out as THE training carrier. I joke that I landed on it during her first time out (May '92) and I broke it :D It went into the yards for an overhaul of some sort the story goes and it never came back out. (My memory and the actual timeline might have some differences - but that is how I remember it!) Wiki says: The year ended with Forrestal making advanced preparations for a change of homeport to Pensacola, Florida, and the transition into a new role as the Navy's training carrier, replacing USS Lexington. Forrestal was redesignated AVT-59 and arrived in Pensacola on 4 February. The ship and crew returned to New Orleans for a visit in May, 1992. Forrestal arrived in Philadelphia 14 September 1992 to begin a 14-month, $157 million complex overhaul prior to assuming duties as a training carrier. In early 1993, however, the Navy decided to decommission Forrestal and leave the Navy without a dedicated training carrier. |
Yikes!! I wonder what that 140hrs would equate to in civilian time. Not a military to civilian conversion mind you, a civilian to military.
|
Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
(Post 1475736)
I notice at time 3+45 that the hook isn't down and the AoA indicator is steady.
In my former airplane, with the switches set appropriately, if the hook wasn't down (for instance a purposeful hook up pass) the AoA indicator will blink. If I remember my time on the platform too - there is a guy with binos looking at each airplane at the 180 deg position and relaying the configuration of the aircraft. They also have to log some touch and goes on the carrier deck in addition to the traps. The footage with hook up, and the light steady could have been from an intended touch and go. I'm not an LSO, but I can speak with confidence saying there isn't anyway they wouldn't notice the stud didn't have his hook down. Once a student shows up in the groove, the LSO isn't going to want them to do anything except fly the pass. Not a good idea to take your hand off the stick to move other switches at that point in time. In addition to buying an unintentional touch and go, he probably bought his LSO "something else" |
usmc - thanks again.
Yeah when I had 140 hours I was chugging around in a cessna landing on runways of 6000' plus. Really difficult stuff. |
Originally Posted by brianb
(Post 1475861)
Yikes!! I wonder what that 140hrs would equate to in civilian time. Not a military to civilian conversion mind you, a civilian to military.
It is impressive the training they can cram into that amount of time in the military world. When I went through I had 60 hours in the T-34C (single engine turboprop) Beechcraft T-34 Mentor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 1) In that time you started with Basic Instruments (think S/L, constant rate climbs/descents, and these awful patterns called S-1,2,3) from the backseat with the canopy covered. 2) Then you went through Familiarization. Actually flying from the front seat - obviously aircraft handling, emergencies, stalls, spins(?) other forms of basic airwork. 13 flights with a checkride and you soloed on the 14th flight. 3) Some aerobatics - this is where the spins might have been along with precision landings introducing pilot to using AoA. 4) Formation (only two-plane/section) 5) Radio Instruments (basically your instrument rating just like in the civilian world) again from the backseat with the canopy covered up. No cheating under the foggles :) and very vertigo inducing in my opinion. 6) Night flying (more instrument work and night time pattern work) ---- Former VT IPs ----- did I miss anything? Then you went to T-2Cs in my case the North American T-2 Buckeye - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia and did the entire syllabus over again in a jet but, with the addition of the Gun Pattern (a fairly complex, high speed, and constanly maneuvering pattern making simulated gun runs against another aircraft towing a banner.) So....at the end of the 60 hrs in the mentor and 80 hrs (including the FCLP flights and the actual CQ) I graduated that phase of training with 140 total hours. I got about another 120 in the TA-4J before winging (all the same items in the syllabus as before but including a strike det to drop bombs, a basic BFM syllaabus, an inverted spin hop back in the T-2C, and going back to the baot a second time around. Enter the T-45A/C aircraft and the amount of time to winging was suppose to go DOWN because you cut out an entire aircraft (the T-2C) between beginning and end and they planned to use a much better simulator system - but I personally don't know how that worked out, but it was approximately 260 hrs from beginning of training to winging for me. |
Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
(Post 1475680)
For someone with no prior flying experience - fellow students in my first CQ class found themselves behind the boat with less than 140 hrs.
Now that they only go to the boat ONCE before getting their wings - the numbers should be higher because they will have gone through different/additional phases of training prior to the first try at CQ (the LTjg mentions the strike det at El Centro for example) Any prior VT IPs at Meridian or Kingsville care to chime in here with the recent numbers an SNA would go to CQ? |
It is intensive training - and it is meant to be such.
I mean 140 hrs and you find yourself behind the boat - solo as mentioned - for the first time; it is more of a gut check than anything else! It is very structured training though. You don't step out of the boundaries very often. I guess it is much like some P141 schools that won't let you wander too far off the reservation or let you touch a cloud for an instant of actual IMC. A guy at that level can get all briefed up, find his way out to the jet, start up, takeoff, join up, and fly out to a working area; but throw in some unusual circumstances and you'll often see a big blank stare. It doesn't go away until quite a bit of experience later in the fleet is gained in my opinion (one reason why I'm not a fan of the reduced hours for ATP). Even after many years of that type of flying, I always say that I feel like a MUCH better, and well rounded, pilot now that I've been flying professionally for a few years out in the civilian world. |
Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
(Post 1475905)
It is intensive training - and it is meant to be such.
I mean 140 hrs and you find yourself behind the boat - solo as mentioned - for the first time; it is more of a gut check than anything else! It is very structured training though. You don't step out of the boundaries very often. I guess it is much like some P141 schools that won't let you wander too far off the reservation or let you touch a cloud for an instant of actual IMC. A guy at that level can get all briefed up, find his way out to the jet, start up, takeoff, join up, and fly out to a working area; but throw in some unusual circumstances and you'll often see a big blank stare. It doesn't go away until quite a bit of experience later in the fleet is gained in my opinion (one reason why I'm not a fan of the reduced hours for ATP). Even after many years of that type of flying, I always say that I feel like a MUCH better, and well rounded, pilot now that I've been flying professionally for a few years out in the civilian world. |
Amazing. Even more amazing how young they are. Really impressive!
|
not quite a jet guy, but...
The times are a bit higher for these guys now. I graduated primary in the T-34C with 100 hours, and the jet bubbas will then spend about another 100 hours before heading out to the boat (with the exception of the E-2/C-2 guys).
As a helo guy (SH-60B/F/H/R), I LOVED my job. Truly memorable. But I frequently went up to the flight deck and stood by the foul line in my flight gear, watching each and every pass from the tail hook cadre. In my last job as a staff officer for the strike group commander, I was lucky enough to get a backseat ride from my boss, an F/A-18F pilot with 22 years experience. Needless to say, it was an awesome experience. It made me remember why I specifically chose not to go the fighter route. (Almost needed that plastic bag!) One thing I learned from my side of the aisle: the helo guys will always envy the jet guys on those CAVU days with zero sea state, and the jet guys will never envy the helo guys on those 200 ft visibility nights on goggles or using a "smoke light" approach to a destroyer. |
Originally Posted by Toonces
(Post 1485826)
The times are a bit higher for these guys now. I graduated primary in the T-34C with 100 hours, and the jet bubbas will then spend about another 100 hours before heading out to the boat (with the exception of the E-2/C-2 guys).
Has the syllabus changed that much or did you have gaps in training, weather delays, med down, or downs? What was your boss' callsign? Good chance I might know him. mpilot153 - I miss your previous response There is a toggle switch in the jet. The only way to get the flashing light to remind you that the hook isn't down is to set it to the "carrier" position. They also have to log some touch and goes on the carrier deck in addition to the traps. The footage with hook up, and the light steady could have been from an intended touch and go. |
USMCFLYR;1485969]That is quite a few more hours than I remember. Has the syllabus changed that much or did you have gaps in training, weather delays, med down, or downs? What was your boss' callsign? Good chance I might know him. I worked for Francis and Nasty, Commander and Rear Admiral types, respectively. |
Nice video. Thanks for posting.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:28 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands