Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Delta to purchase $2.3 BILLION worth of RJ's >

Delta to purchase $2.3 BILLION worth of RJ's

Search
Notices

Delta to purchase $2.3 BILLION worth of RJ's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-27-2016, 07:49 AM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 60
Default Delta to purchase $2.3 BILLION worth of RJ's

Delta Mulls $2.3 Billion Regional-Jet Purchase in Fleet Shift - Bloomberg

Delta Air Lines Inc. is studying a purchase of roomier regional jets with a list value of as much as $2.3 billion -- provided the company can get the pilots’ union to accept an overhaul of the small-plane fleet.

The Atlanta-based carrier told the Air Line Pilots Association it wants the option of adding as many as 50 more planes in the 70- to 76-seat range, according to a union memo sent to pilots on Sept. 10. Those aircraft, which can accommodate coach and first-class cabins, are more fuel-efficient and profitable than the all-coach 50-seaters now flying many short hops.

Delta also told the union it may eliminate the smaller planes from the fleet without giving a timeline, according to the memo, which was obtained by Bloomberg News. The potential cost of buying larger regional jets is based on list prices for aircraft in the 70-seat range made by Embraer SA and Bombardier Inc., before discounts that are customary for large orders.

The pilots’ union has objected to any additional 70- or 76-seat jets being flown by Delta’s regional affiliate airlines, ALPA Chairman John Malone said. A Delta spokesman declined to comment.

Up-Gauging
U.S. airlines have been cutting their use of 50-seat jets and switching to larger planes, a practice known as “up-gauging.” In addition to lacking a first-class cabin, the 50-seat planes have been criticized by passengers as cramped. Delta had 153 of the aircraft as of July, compared with 309 three years ago, according to regulatory filings.
The 50-seat jets are flown by Delta’s regional affiliate airlines under the Delta Connection brand. Any new 76-seat aircraft would also be flown by the affiliates.

Even so, under their union contract Delta’s own pilots have a say over which aircraft can be flown by the affiliate airlines. Such rules are spelled out in contract “scope clauses.”
Pilots for major airlines generally object to the practice of outsourcing any flights to the regional carriers and prefer that they be given all flights, said Louis Smith, president of consulting firm Future & Active Pilot Advisors. A looming shortage of people qualified to fly commercially may give them more clout, he said.
“With the bargaining power of mainline pilot unions increasing, I don’t foresee any pilot group relaxing any of the rules related to scope clauses,” Smith said.
In the long term, Delta probably will bring more flying in-house and cut down on the use of regional carriers, said Michael Boyd, president of aviation consultant Boyd Group International. Pay and costs are rising among the smaller airlines, making them less attractive, he said.
Chris Hansen is offline  
Old 09-27-2016, 08:01 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 320B
Posts: 454
Default

Does anybody know exactly the numbers of regional airframes our current scope clause allows? And how many we currently operate?
TurbineDriver is offline  
Old 09-27-2016, 08:01 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,503
Default

#scopechoke
tunes is offline  
Old 09-27-2016, 08:01 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flyallnite's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Posts: 1,898
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Hansen View Post
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-27/delta-mulls-2-3-billion-regional-jet-purchase-in-fleet-shift?cmpid=yhoo.headline

No. no. No. no. No. please no.
DALPA just keeps giving on scope. The argument that this agreement will reduce block hours and protect mainline flying is false on many counts.

First, it will permit the heaviest, most capable jet ever flown by a regional affiliate in the DL system. These are actually 90 seat jets, configured to 76 seats with a real first class cabin and transcon range... something that's never been permitted at our airline.

Second, this AIP will give a shot in the arm to the whipsaw model of regionals vs. mainline that has decimated our profession. If anyone thinks that this is the endgame, then consider--

Third, DL management plays chess. Look one or two moves ahead to see the real motive here. The next TA will be set up to permit more, heavier RJ's which can be used not for expansion, but for replacement of mainline flying and leverage against mainline pilots during negotiations.

In summary, this agreement doesn't do what DALPA says it does. It does quite the opposite. The regional model is on it's death bed. DALPA and the company want to give it an organ transplant and they're using our kidneys. Don't fall for the spin. This AIP is a very dangerous first step in the wrong direction.

We have the leverage here. DL has a plan B. There is no need for the good of our company to support this particular AIP, and there is every reason to oppose it.
flyallnite is offline  
Old 09-27-2016, 08:06 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dirtdiver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 767A
Posts: 791
Default

Delta can operate all the RJs of any size they want. The only restriction is on outsourcing
Dirtdiver is offline  
Old 09-27-2016, 08:09 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

louis smith apparently is unaware delta pilots are part of an association, and not a union.
BobZ is offline  
Old 09-27-2016, 08:17 AM
  #7  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

What Boyd fails to realize is when Delta went to terminate their ASA with RAH, the government wanted to renegotiate their market share flown by RAH. Delta was thus forced to sign a new deal with RAH.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 09-27-2016, 08:20 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by flyallnite View Post
Third, DL management plays chess. Look one or two moves ahead to see the real motive here. The next TA will be set up to permit more, heavier RJ's which can be used not for expansion, but for replacement of mainline flying and leverage against mainline pilots during negotiations.
Let's discuss this a bit. The way I see this at this particular time, there will be a reduction of 50 seat airframes sooner and an increase in fewer albeit larger airframes. There's a quid pro quo there. The next move won't have one as far as I can see. What do you think it will be?

I can go either way on this to be honest. But I really don't see the current deal as anything to get my panties bunched. But going forward, what would be our incentive to allow larger/heavier RJs that you allege management would want? I think you are being a little paranoid about that frankly. I don't believe that the 'gap' that is filled by the 76s will be able to be filled by any larger airframes in the future because bigger with less frequency is not a real advantage.
JamesBond is offline  
Old 09-27-2016, 08:21 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
What Boyd fails to realize is when Delta went to terminate their ASA with RAH, the government wanted to renegotiate their market share flown by RAH. Delta was thus forced to sign a new deal with RAH.
You have a source for this?
JamesBond is offline  
Old 09-27-2016, 08:22 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
...the government wanted to renegotiate their market share flown by RAH.
Huh? Where did you get this one?
Flytolive is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StraightShooter
Endeavor Air
124
06-26-2023 10:23 AM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
norskman2
Regional
18
07-18-2011 02:26 AM
Sir James
Major
0
04-13-2005 10:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices