Radial Vs. Piston
#21
The story I heard about the 500 there, which is N130P, is that it was flown in one time, and then the bank repossessed it while there, and it just never left. There have been a few attempts at getting it airworthy again, but as of yet, no one has been successful. There is an attempt being made now to get it airborne and out of there before they decide that it has to be scrapped along with the DC-4's, and -6, and Lodestar's/Harpoon's there, but who knows if it will actually happen.
Here's a photo of it: http://www.airliners.net/photo/Howard-500/1196803/L/
One of the Harpoons there is also a rare bird. It has a pod in the nose for guns, which from what I understand is a rare feature on those aircraft.
I'm not sure how accurate all this information is, but it's what one of the people at Memorial told me when I stopped by there a couple months ago (I used to love going inside those old planes...I have pictures if anyones interested).
#22
MMM, Howard 500...
Not to be a downer or anything here but a radial engine is a piston engine.
Just aligned properly so that they dont shake the plane appart like the little flat motors.
A side note, One of the big engine rebuild shops specializing in radials, has more business than ever, as there are reports of many turbine AG operators switching out the turbines in favor of the old engines, seems as fuel and rebuild costs are making it more economical to go back to the old ways.
Not to be a downer or anything here but a radial engine is a piston engine.
Just aligned properly so that they dont shake the plane appart like the little flat motors.
A side note, One of the big engine rebuild shops specializing in radials, has more business than ever, as there are reports of many turbine AG operators switching out the turbines in favor of the old engines, seems as fuel and rebuild costs are making it more economical to go back to the old ways.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post