Seminole vs 737 Type/ATP
#11
Good data points.
I have the type. Out of 3 career fairs + a Vets in Blue event, the only company that viewed it as something other than positive was JetBlue.
At a CP meet and greet with UA, he mentioned the 737 type as a positive.
It's not 2006 anymore, the hiring trends are a lot different.
I have the type. Out of 3 career fairs + a Vets in Blue event, the only company that viewed it as something other than positive was JetBlue.
At a CP meet and greet with UA, he mentioned the 737 type as a positive.
It's not 2006 anymore, the hiring trends are a lot different.
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 396
Only insecure airlines/HR will have a negative view of a 737 type rating and they are the airlines to avoid, given a choice. IMHO, I'd use the $ to get some stick time. Airlines nowadays don't really care if you have a type rating or not, especially if you are coming from the military. Turbine PIC and currency are the two biggies, from my experience.
#16
I was trying to make the same decision not long ago. I decided to go with the 737 Type/ATP for two reasons 1) very little money out of pocket with the GI Bill (the Seminole ATP is almost half way there if you pay out of pocket anyway) and 2) Being military trained, I do better in a program with a syllabus and more structure vs. the three day fly until you're ready light twin program. The fact that I wouldn't mind flying for Southwest doesn't hurt either.
#17
One other thing to think about, most Boeings have a family resemblance. If you understand how Boeing builds an electrical system or a pneumatic system, a lot of the terminology carries over between types. If you learn "Boeing" in a bit more relaxed 142 setting, airline initial training might be a bit easier. It's a double edged sword and you need to figure what info to keep and what to dump.
#18
Have you ever heard of someone failing the check ride at HP? There's something to be said for the controlled environment of a simulator that comes without surprises. With a little research on APC you'll see several--although probably still rare--occurrences of unnecessarily stressful passed or failed check rides at places like All ATPs etc. from people with only military experience and/or given by examiners that "have it out" for military pilots (perceived or not). Having to explain a busted check ride for reasons fair or unfair may not be worth the money saved.
A few years ago when Southwest was the place to be that was one thing, but these days places like Delta know that people would now choose Delta over Southwest so they aren't worried about you jumping ship if SWA starts hiring again.
#19
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 33
Another important thing that the type rating gets you is the ability to "check" another box on the electronic application. Then when the computer gonks up your score, it just might put you that much more ahead in the "call for an interview" stack over those without it...which equals seniority.
Also, as a military retiree (I'm one too), if the extra $3k that it costs over the cheaper route is REALLY gonna break you...ya might also want to start setting some extra money aside for a financial planning class.
Also, as a military retiree (I'm one too), if the extra $3k that it costs over the cheaper route is REALLY gonna break you...ya might also want to start setting some extra money aside for a financial planning class.
#20
New Hire
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: Driving a desk
Posts: 7
Thanks for all the good advice. Any comments on if it should be done in the 737NG or the 737-200/300? Also, if the retirement date is 18-20 months from now, does anyone recommend starting the application process now or 3 months prior to terminal leave.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post