A rainy day here produced the following analysis. I did this for a Cessna 150 but you could change the numbers to fit the 152. I did two analyses, a quickie to establish order of magnitude then a more careful one that takes into account more variables.

It is interesting to note the much greater runway require for the more accurate analysis than the quickie. This is because the quickie is a very simple case. Even so, my calculation shows this airplane could conceivably be airborne in 250 feet. That's less than half the POH distance of 655 ft. Some reasons are, the airplane in my example is loaded as lightly a possible with almost no fuel, the msl atmosphere is lower than in POH (1,000 vs. 2,000), and my liftoff speed is based on stall plus 10% as a power on figure, not power off as given in the POH.

Obviously (I hope) this is not something you should attempt and think it might work. This is just for the sake of aeronautical science. I did not bother with the speed required to clear the 50 foot obstacle, and in real life you would never take off from a grass strip using only a ground roll figure. I just wanted to show how this kind of thing is done.